Profile of Domine

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 500

General Information


Thread: Usf stock grenades10 Aug 2017, 20:10 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Aug 2017, 18:46 PMRocket I dunno seems like obers and PG aoe is fn huge and the timer is shorter or something cause i can move as far away from one of there grenades and still get wiped, USF one move just a hair away no dmg. PGs and Obers use the Bundle nade which has much better aoe. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscripts need to be balanced4 Aug 2017, 16:09 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Aug 2017, 15:58 PMle_saucisson_masque so you believe that one conscript squad with AT nade is enough ? You don't have to believe me. I'm stating what happened when we buffed conscripts because people said 'Maxim + guard spam only happens because Soviets don't have other alternatives' and the result was Maxim and guards spam with one or two cons for merge or at nade. Look, here's what's gonna happen. I've been playing this game since release, and I've played in top 100 too. You don't have to believe me, but I just know. Threads like this happen on a weekly basis. Somebody says cons are bad and need buff with the flavor of the month proposition (my favorite one was giving conscripts the utility of engineers). Everyone will agree, thread will die down, conscripts will remain unchanged. The cycle continues... Have fun with your thread. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscripts need to be balanced4 Aug 2017, 15:57 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Aug 2017, 15:29 PMkarolllus See, here's where you're wrong, I would use them. Good for you, doesn't change a thing. I used Soviet 45mm at guns for trolling. 45mm confirmed for meta, pls nerf! Jump back to quoted post4 Aug 2017, 15:29 PMkarolllus Proof or it didnt happen. Seriously stop trolling. Because of people like you meta is shit. Its not gonna change anything if we buff cons so better not do it just to be sure soviets will be trash. And they will be after Fall Dogshit Patch and penals nerf. Now soviets will just tank losses without providing any good units. Probably meta will shit towards guard rifles again. Soviets will defend try to stall the game with maxims and cons early to field guard rifles. Is that how this faction is supposed to look like? Pay the same price for half as good of a unit? Cons 240 mp - dogshit molotv upgrade, at nade upgrade, no other weapons Grens 240 mp - NO nade upgrade, NO at upgrade, NO upgrade for weapons Volks 250 mp - NO nade upgrade, NO at upgrade, NO upgrade for weapons This game revolves around core infantry. Either you give each faction a comparable counterpart or factions without a decent core infantry will always be mediocre at best. The meta is shit because certain core rules of the game have been ignored. WFA armies was a powercreep and threw a lot of the guidelines the game has adhered to apart. Weapon racks, free shit, etc. etc. If you're salty because cons that's not my fault. The community has been discussing buffing cons for years. Notable propositions were introducing weapons for Conscripts, lowering the cost to something very low and giving them very low durability. Now you come here and stomp your feet because you don't get what you want implemented immediately. If this game were about core infantry then the game would be absolutely dominated by USF. How comes this isn't the case? Why did super op OKW, with no side tech perform so badly in the tournament? How comes a moving dps penalty to Penals is gonna turn them dogshit, suddenly? Nobody knows. If you're gonna come here and make propositions the community has been making for 4 years(that's 1/3rd of your lifespan bro) and then wonder why nothing is getting implemented, you're gonna be here for a long time. Oh and bonus: Cons actually were worse in the past, yet somehow people still managed to dominate the game with it(maxim spam Eyebrow wiggle) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscripts need to be balanced4 Aug 2017, 15:14 PM Even if you buff them, nobody will use them if you have Penals available. It's gonna be 1 con squad to merge or at nade things. It was the same when Maxims were in their heyday. They buffed cons and guards to provide an alternative to maxims, but instead now Soviets had units that optimally shielded the maxims from flanking and vehicles. Volks, even upgraded and at vet 5, can lose to cons btw. Seen it happen. Also seen Rear Echelons win against vetted Volks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is Wehrmacht Competitive Right Now?1 Aug 2017, 16:47 PM Ostheer is bad because it got overrun by the powercreep. Compare their units. Pak 40 is not as good as it once was, P4 is worse than it's counterparts, still costs 125 fuel, ridiculous teching, underperforming infantry, Tiger being bad, and to top it all off, it's getting nerfed even further soon. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fall balance patch - Raketen nerf27 Jul 2017, 18:00 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Jul 2017, 17:11 PMRocket If you use it right you would say its fine or agree with slight nerf. Couple days ago in a 2v2 vs intelligence and his buddy I use a stolen one with camo to destroy there LefH, it was hilarious cause it kept disapearing cause of the camo and it made it back because it can retreat!! Also last night in a 2v2 against Taylor Swift my partner used a stolen one in camo to kill werfers 2 different times, and used it to scout for 17 pdr and our team rest of the game. Rakaten is fine the camo is actually over preforming really considering it can retreat, its also available from the start and its cheap and effective vs any allied armor pretty much. I absolutely agree. We should nerf the raketen by mirroring it's stats(cost too, of course) with the Pak 40. That way it won't have an overperforming cloak anymore. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fall balance patch - Raketen nerf22 Jul 2017, 20:54 PM I was reading through the FB patch notes and noticed that the raketen got it's durability nerfed, without anything to make up for it. Definitely needs to be reverted. I can't think of many units in the game which are as bad at what they're supposed to do compared to alternatives. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [SOV.] Make AT satchels exclusive to AT rifles?12 Jul 2017, 16:03 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jul 2017, 06:05 AMLoopDloop outside of those two instances is when the opponent clearly outplays you, which isn't a problem. This applies to each and every ability, unit and situation in the game that has ever existed In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [SOV.] Make AT satchels exclusive to AT rifles?11 Jul 2017, 15:50 PM What exactly is the reason a specialist AI unit with access to AT has a snare in the first place? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [SOV.] Make AT satchels exclusive to AT rifles?9 Jul 2017, 21:50 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Jul 2017, 15:57 PMincognito Easies to kike Our hate for the kikes unites us brother In: COH2 Balance