some say he is the best coh2 player to have ever graced the earth
all we know is, he is called lmctx
The Stig wants his mojo back.........
Posts: 1954
Thread: M4C Sherman blob of doom3 Mar 2017, 16:32 PM
The Stig wants his mojo back......... In: Replays |
Thread: Fixing Stealth Cooldowns Isn't Enough3 Mar 2017, 03:00 AM
stuff.... The stealth is a compensation for the raketen being the worst AT gun in the game. I'd gladly trade it for a Pak40 when playing OKW. It misses a lot, seems to take a long time to aim, and has a shorter range than most AT guns. I'm pretty sure that most recon skills make it visible but haven't tested all of them. The radio beacons from IR pathfinders or regular pathfinders show them on the mini-map. The only time I've really been annoyed with them was when playing UKF and trying sim-city, and I'll bet that they were a lot more annoyed with sim-city than I was with the raketen. I could see giving engineers or RE's a little longer detection range if counterplay is really needed. In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: M4C Sherman blob of doom3 Mar 2017, 02:49 AM
In: Replays |
Thread: Royal Artillery Regiment2 Mar 2017, 03:05 AM
Or maybe just leave it alone. Having most of the abilities be worthless keeps this commander from being part of the meta, and the last thing this game needs is more indirect. In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: M4C Sherman blob of doom2 Mar 2017, 03:01 AM
Um, pretty sure that Paula is still around, unless there is someone else with the name HOI Paula (sp?) who likes to play 1v1's. Got stomped badly by him yesterday. In: Replays |
Thread: Royal Artillery Regiment1 Mar 2017, 06:53 AM
The air burst shells hit first, followed by regular arty. If you can time it right, you can really punish someone who blobs and mass retreats. It's also good for taking out Ost bunkers. I've used this a lot. I normally have problems early and mid but the late game is normally pretty good. Here is a replay where I had a rough start but had a good comeback. If you like seeing Elefants go up in smoke, you'll like this. In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: 2v2 UKF early game1 Mar 2017, 06:49 AM
If someone who plays UKF in team games has time to look at the early game (up to 25 minutes) and let me know what to do differently, I would greatly appreciate it. I've been trying to pick up UKF but my early and mid game suck. The whole replay lasts awhile so you may not want to watch it all. We were down 480 to 70 (roughly) and won 25 - 0. In: Replays |
Thread: OKW need a early anti MG-Spam unit.24 Feb 2017, 01:59 AM
You are absolutely right: [url=][img="http://i66.tinypic.com/15me6b9.jpg" alt=""] rekt in 16 minutes, mvp = Maxim Maxims are one of the worst units for scaling into the late game. I'd much rather face them than the penals/guards/T70 bs that some players do. In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: The issue with Ostheer Tech 4.17 Feb 2017, 21:37 PM
The Brummbar is pretty good against things like SU76's. They make a great meat shield in front of pak40's and wipe weapon teams like crazy. The Panzerwerfer is also okay. I like the Katy a little better but it still seems okay. The real issue with T4 is that it takes a long time to get there and is expensive. Also, the Panther needs some buffs. In: Lobby |
Thread: Your wishes for the Panther17 Feb 2017, 20:34 PM
The pintle MG on the Ost Panther does need a buff. I got bored with playing USF or UKF and played mostly OKW and Ost this last week. The OKW Panther seems okay, but shouldn't cost more than a Comet (probably a little less). The Ost Panther was completely underwhelming. It doesn't do anything that a Stug G can't do, and costs twice as much fuel. There is nothing more annoying than diving in after a badly damaged tank and having multiple misses in a row, followed by having to retreat it (without killing the wounded tank)and take an eon to get back into battle while engineers repair it. If you spend the resources to tech T4 and get a Panther, it ought to be good for something that T3 doesn't do. PS - current Tiger seems underwhelming also, like a really expensive damage sponge. In: COH2 Balance |
26 | |||||
898 | |||||
6 | |||||
4 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |