Hi Seaking,
You are a outlier in the Soviet 1v1 ladder right now. Can you give us some tips on how to improve our Soviet 1v1 game so we can achieve the same results as you?
Would be interested to hear your thoughts on how to achieve the same results.
If this is you then u need a looong way to ride and start to play other than 4's 
http://www.companyofheroes.com/leaderboards#profile/steam/76561197992591758/standings |
Start a new account after playing for years and noobstomp your way through a small number of matches.
Apparently my Account is new?  |
|
Thank u Stormjäger for taking your time to analyse! I appreciate it. |
As previously shown that conversation was kind of one way wasn't it...
But you talking about analysis. Opponents saying it's me? You really not answering my question.
The offer which u made for me was.
a) take it to a vote with the potential of a permaban
b) admit to something i didn't do and get a timeban |
4) The Deadbolt account easily won several games against high level 2v2 opponents with double the CPM than usual after the initial warning/ban, the opponents thought it was Seeking, and all analysis of the replays pointed towards someone other than Deadbolt (a rank 300ish player) playing. This was presented to Seeking, with no response.
So you referring the game of Creativename and Rutra where Deadbolt and Flap won against them? Can we get the opinion about the opponnents? I tried to explain the CPM issue in my document and even put games where he plays against me with higher CPM. Where are the analysis of the replays? If u referring the game where they lost to borobadger and toyvendor and i really don't think they are high level 2v2 players. You never really presented me the actual evidence. |
You chose to work on a document that you knew I was saying would no longer be relevant to the actions I thought should take, you were given this first and knew about it before anyone, you chose to ignore it?
Why should i take any of your offer when u displace me in the public eye as a gulity person. You gave me the opportunity to defend myself and then coming out of nowhere to make a deal. In that case i wanted to be silent and concentrate on my document instead of giving you a reply. You also stated "who gives a fuck" about my document. You made this public and i have my right to show my side and people were waiting for it. But u justifiy ur proceeding because i didn't respond? |
Hey guys,
can we please come back to the real issue and stop complaining about who said what to whom in private or public? This is not Kindergarden...
I have got 1 simple Question: Where is the problem?
From 20 top high level players 18 believe Seeking was hacking. Sander confesses, he has not enough skill to judge, but also believes in hacking.
Only 1, ed80hertz, gives benefit of doubt.
So what are we talking about? There is no 100% save way of proving Seeking was hacking. Relic admitted that.
From the beginning of this issue, everybody knew, this will be decided by opinions. And if 19 top players think, Seeking was cheating, then sorry about that, but it seems clear to me....there is not even a need for Seekings response.
Thats a fair point. This was the reason why i tried to talk with the most of the people in the playerlist. The players who got asked had to answer some clips which got provided by them and they had to say what they think. They never said its 100% hack. They said yes some clips are looking sus in their opinion but thats it. They did not even got asked if AE/Sturmpanther are allowed to use their names in the public document. Some of them are really pissed about this. In my opinion the playerlist is not accurate. |
LOL
You could have said... Hang on I'm working on it.
You can go to court and refuse to say anything all the way through the trial, that doesn't mean people will wait for you.
I am pretty sure everyone knew that i was working on my document. I even talked with mutliply people (players,refs) and they were all waiting for my document. I also streamed last time and people asked me if i am trying to appeal. AE even gave me the chance of one week of response to this case. You can also check AE's second video. When AE made the interview with me he also told me that he is waiting for my document to get realesed. |
What agreed process, a general concept was suggested, but I don't remember anywhere a process being agreed and adhered to?
I do think we should have processes and procedures for the future, as outlined in my announcement on this matter.
The only official thing I declared to seeking was from what I could see the only factual way to proceed, and it was suggested to him first, he ignored it. I waited two days then decided to proceed.
I have my right to remain silent. My document was supposed to be the response to you. proceding because i didn't answer isn't justifying to ban me. |
|
|
Relic Entertainment
