would that not be the same for the ostheer tier 4 then?
No, not the same. T3 seems better option - it's true, but Phanter still a Phanter, with 960hp and 352 armor after 2nd star, and you can get it cheaper than it is now by skipping, it was quite solid option during NDA. However I'm not in denial that Wulframen or Brummbär need a look at, they need just a little tweak.
Majority of people here would be glad to pay higher price for buffed T-34/76, it isn't problem. |
|
It's fine, for flamer/shitty canon heavy tank and damage isn't important for flamer vs inf, more important is rate of fire and crit chance. |
|
For me is shocking, that there are people on COH2.ORG (most popular coh related site) that play this game, and still doesn't know anything about future changes. Come-on people - you have the Internet. |
If you want to buff the T34, you will have to change the call-ins system at the same time... as far as i saw on this thead, is only "buff T34 bye bye"
Who knows... who knows... maybe it will happen too.
as far as i saw on this thead, is only "buff T34 bye bye"
It isn't true - there was a lot of suggestion of changing it with buff of one thing for exchange of another, or increase for buff, or mu related buff, it isn't so straightforward like you trying to show. |
|
Wining with a monstrous gap of 0.02%. |
Not at all. let priority perhaps but it wasn't killed
Less priority than in current meta = almost never will be build future meta = dead unit. |
- I really don't see the necessity of a buffed T-34 that will come earlier than everything else + the call-ins that will complement him very well. Lets not take units alone, but lets look the whole picture.
- Panzerwerfer is kinda trash imo.
-Not in the NDA.
-Yes, it need some love.
You know just as well as i do that the soviets are not dependant on the t-34 in the alpha.Aand the clunky tech tree got fixed and is very fluid.
Some of changes were good, but they totally killed that unit, if you are not using right doctrine.
|
In the land of NDA (unless Relic changes things without majority of recent alpha tester's knowledge), whatever advantages the T34 had over the enemy and within the current stock army
become completely redundant/nonexistent, making it much rarer and very unfavorable.
Totally agree in NDA - T-34/76 lost it's only one current advantage and didn't get anything in exchange, in the other hand , in NDA land, PIV was better option than in current meta. |
These differences make sense for me, because each tank has it's role and developes for different ways of usage on the battlefield. One gains armor, other gains speed, one gets blitz, the other one gets secure mode, one gets more buffs on certain feature than the other and vice versa.
Cause armour buffing vet is rare thing, it's very good and that make all the difference, 10 tanks/td have them by vet, 6-ost and 4-okw. If vet0 T-34/76 vs PanzerIV is a game of chance with PanzerIV advantage, vet3 T-34/76 vs PanzerIV is almost one way battle, it is 51%/42%/34% vs 80%/73%/67% for penetration of front armor, and 100%/85%/68% vs 100%/100%/100% for rare, with a little bit faster speed (without Blitzkrieg) and 0,3sec faster reload. Exchange of vet2 or vet3 reload bonus to vet hp bonus, wouldn't make T-34/76 better than PanzerIV, but it will be more close competition between them, even with increasing of it's price.
|
And IS2 will still not care of P4 Vet 2, cause he will always penetrate him.
It isn't completely true, at close - 100%, at mid - 94%, at far - 81%. In other hand, Tiger will always penetrate T-34/76, T-34/85 or different models of Sherman, except Easy Eight (100%/93%/83%) and Bulldozer (100%/100%/90%), at any distance. |
Russian Federation
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
