Posts: 770
Sigh, when would people realize that the tank on itself is not good rather than the shock/rush value of having a medium tank on the field.
A SINGLE buff is needed (RoF, Price, Upgrades, veterancy, whatever).
Posts: 354
would that not be the same for the ostheer tier 4 then?
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Posts: 4928
in what way is it not good compared to the p4 or sherman. Any buffs and you also need to up the price of the t-34 as it is perfectly priced.
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
Posts: 708 | Subs: 1
He is the cheapest, prove me not.
1 Posts: 440
He isn't.
He just knows what changes are coming and somewhat understands them.
This unit will be new SU-76 post patch and no one wants that.
Hell, relic acknowledged it as a noob trap and there are still some retarded people believing its fine using arguments "because when I'm owned it arrives faster".
However T34 indeed doesn't need much. 10% cost decrease alone would likely suffice.
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
Let's makes some hypothetical changes. Some which have been suggested in the past:
-Heavy call ins are limited to 1
-Medium and Heavy call in tanks requires tech
-Soviet teching is overhaul, moving the "light" vehicles to T3 and the tanks to T4. T3 is cheap and required to get T4.
1 Posts: 440
Maybe it's because I'm not a fanboy.
Posts: 770
Compared to the Sherman, it has a slower rate of fire, worse anti-infantry, and worse veterancy. In fact, the T-34/76's main gun is about as effective vs Infantry as the Sherman's gun with AP rounds loaded.
Posts: 275 | Subs: 1
Thats why its cheaper.
6 Posts: 328
Posts: 760
reading your post goves me cancer, you think the su85 needs a buff, but not the t34? What game are you playing? The su85 is a phenomenal td its only issue is path finding and its in a tier with no direct ai to support it. The t34 is just about as extinct as the su76 i never see sov players use them just callins. All it needs is a rof and/or a accuracy buff for it to be worth it.
Thats why its cheaper. and do not forget that the sherman is perhaps the cost effective its in a different faction which has no heavies whatsoever. so i dont mind that their medium stock tank is better.
I will agree that the current soviet stock is up, but problem is the bad teching options and the su-76 and su85 not performing as TD's. Buffing the t-34 will solve nothing.
Posts: 760
reading your post goves me cancer, you think the su85 needs a buff, but not the t34? What game are you playing? The su85 is a phenomenal td its only issue is path finding and its in a tier with no direct ai to support it. The t34 is just about as extinct as the su76 i never see sov players use them just callins. All it needs is a rof and/or a accuracy buff for it to be worth it.
Thats why its cheaper. and do not forget that the sherman is perhaps the cost effective its in a different faction which has no heavies whatsoever. so i dont mind that their medium stock tank is better.
I will agree that the current soviet stock is up, but problem is the bad teching options and the su-76 and su85 not performing as TD's. Buffing the t-34 will solve nothing.
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
Who cares about price. Give T-34 armor, firepower and speed from Panther and Panther price and tech requirements. SU players need a tank, not a one-off anti-tank grenade. If i need cheap tank i build T-70. T-34-76 like T4 unit is just ridiculous.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
BURN THE WITCH!!!!!!! He said the Earth is round before it is revealed by science!
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Depends on tier costs.
If it would be something like
T1 - 50FU
T2 - 50FU
T3 - 60FU
T4 - 70FU
then timing is decreased only for 10 fuel in comparsion to what it is in current patch.
It T-34 price would be reduced for 10 fuel to compensate, it would be in great spot.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 4928
Thats why its cheaper. and do not forget that the sherman is perhaps the cost effective its in a different faction which has no heavies whatsoever. so i dont mind that their medium stock tank is better.
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
Posts: 354
Depends on tier costs.
If it would be something like
T1 - 50FU
T2 - 50FU
T3 - 60FU
T4 - 70FU
then timing is decreased only for 10 fuel in comparsion to what it is in current patch.
It T-34 price would be reduced for 10 fuel to compensate, it would be in great spot.
![avatar of 1[][]](/uploads/avatar/9394.png?updated=1397144681)
Posts: 172
Posts: 670
I prefer making it cheaper. The whole point of allies is to have more than axis. If Allies could compete for quality easily then Axis loses its edge and it won't solve anything for balance
I myself bought 14 OKW factions during a Steam sale last year for alt accounts
 |
|
|
15 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
220 | ||
 |
|
|
7 | ||
 |
|
|
7 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
