Profile of butterfingers158

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 239

General Information


Thread: USF and mobile rocket artillery24 Sep 2014, 21:09 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Sep 2014, 21:00 PMRomeo Even if it has exact same stats it is still better because it is being used on more important targets. As axis your teller mine will hit one out of a zillion allied tanks spam. As allies your m20 mine could win you the game by disabling a panther, jagdp, KT, etc. Or your M20 mine could get hit by a 222, Puma, Luchs,P4, hell the OKW building halftrack could hit it. I think the M20 mine is great, but I think being forced into a tech choice to get mines at all is dumb (and a big "BUY SWEEPERS" sign to your opponent) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF and mobile rocket artillery24 Sep 2014, 20:53 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Sep 2014, 20:48 PMRomeo Yes it's behind a tier of tech but considering it's basically the best mine in the game I think that's fair. Anti-infantry mines are not that important. Yes if you can bleed or deny an area it is somewhat useful, but immobilize a KT is better I think! As far as I can tell it is identical to a teller mine and costs 10 munitions more (maybe has better immobilize chance?) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF and mobile rocket artillery24 Sep 2014, 20:42 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Sep 2014, 20:40 PMbroodwarjc How much did the US even use mines during WW2? Most of the time they were pushing the Germans back and not vice versa. Who cares? It's a video game In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF and mobile rocket artillery24 Sep 2014, 20:34 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Sep 2014, 18:41 PMLemonJuice the usf has the m20 mine, stop making the argument that it doesnt have a nondoctrinal mine when the m20 mine is extremely powerful and is a guaranteed engine destroyed or immobilized Being forced to go Lieutenant and then M-20 if I want mines is kinda limiting. Sure I love the M-20 and it's a great mine, but the current placement of it discourages going Captain. No anti-infantry mines at all is also a huge bummer, especially when a Shreck flank can kill all your anti tank in about 3 seconds. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF and mobile rocket artillery24 Sep 2014, 10:35 AM I only listed things all three other factions have. USF does have doctrinal flamers in 3 doctrines (Armor and Mechanized can get Assault Engies, Rifle you can get Riflemen flamers) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: IS2 vs Infantry24 Sep 2014, 08:45 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Sep 2014, 08:43 AMJohnnyB they could though at least give Tiger some advantage. You mean like considerably lower reload and scatter thus meaning it does more DPS to both tanks and infantry? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: IS2 vs Infantry24 Sep 2014, 08:25 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Sep 2014, 08:21 AMdasheepeh lol at is2 frontal armor Dat 425 frontal King Tiger and 525 frontal Jagdtiger In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [3v3] P47 spam and anti-air vehicles24 Sep 2014, 08:23 AM When you see the P-47 coming just start driving (probably in reverse so you're aren't driving into AT fire). Most of the rockets will miss. In: Strategy Desk
Thread: IS2 vs Infantry24 Sep 2014, 05:52 AM Top gunner on the IS-2 and ISU-152 are really strong, main gun on IS-2 sucks against infantry though. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF and mobile rocket artillery24 Sep 2014, 04:46 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Sep 2014, 04:44 AMLucas Troy Wow, I know that you stole it with falls, who aren't the ideal capturing unit, but Jesus, that piece of shit wannabe artillery gun costs more to reinforce than soviet snipers. Wrong thread there bud In: COH2 Balance