Profile of Glendizzle

Abstain and this is why this poll is completely irrelevant and even more idiotic to simplify it into some sort of moral black and white choice, so sit down children we have some talking to do,apparently we have not pass the stage of being naive . Relic as a studio relies on a publisher like SEGA to fund games like coh. Relic may have "creative freedom" but sega is busniess that dictates the products priorities like coh2. You snobs have to understand that when it comes to releasing new content to generate more sales is far more important then spending money on a already sold product. The fact that companys like sega allow studios like relic to re visit and balance the game (which equals expenses) is great. The faster you understand that extra content is both healty for the studuo, the publisher and the consumer the faster you annoying whiners can grow up and join us in the grown up world. Often times its not up to relic when it comes to releasing products and time tables for balance, a infusion of money into any studio or publisher insures the future of the brand and product, so obviously content is more important, not to say that balance isnt its just not top priority.

this is it. and who doesn't like new stuff. you elite 1v1 guys should know better than us 4v4 scrubs that this game is never going to be e-sports unless they totally redid the whole damn game, which they won't, and i wouldn't want. new stuff = more money = allows them to work on the game more. pretty simple really. at no point can you ignore economics when it comes to considering anything. Balance isn't as bad as some of you guys make it out to be either. In my experience, RNG decides more games than balance and those are few and far between. Usually what decides a game is who made dumbass mistakes and who capitalized on them.

absolutely, more new stuff. i like new stuff, it breaks the meta too, so there is another plus. just imagine how blown to hell the meta will be if what we think that custom doctrines ends up being true. its better for us the consumer, since it allows more customization to your play style, and it makes relic money, which in turn allows them to keep making new stuff and patches. the definition of win-win.

I personally am excited to have a chance to get free stuff. I also think like many others this is a case of be careful what you wish for.

Bitch about game breaking p2w doctrines = bo new doctrines.

Bitch about giving away "gameplay affecting stuff for an event = no new commandate for mwnl2. We get cosmetic stuff.

I think there are too many trolls under this bridge. You bitch when you get what you asked for (by previous bitching). I didn't know coh2 existed a year ago and have longed for CAS ever since I first crossed it's path.

My only bitch is that I think relic doesn't do enough advertising/marketing. As a casual gamer who effing loves strategy games I should have heard of coh2 before WFA. I also think they should have promoted mwnl2. I had to creep Rome2 forums for info. In theory, if they spend more to get their name out more, then they will draw in more new players which helps to increase revenue. Rising tide lifts all boats. The better relic does then the better they can make the game then the more enjoyable it is to play.

I also think it's a bit disingenuous to says they aren't doing anything. We pretty much know they are doing something with british and that some sort of custom commanders are in the works. If that doesn't shake up the meta then nothing will. So I guess what I'm saying is..... quityerbitchin!!!111!1!

So, I did to? If even a fraction of the resources they spent on it was put into fixing the multiplayer the game wouldn't be in nearly as horrible a state as it is in right now.

If u looked at van voort's thread you'd know we hardcore mp users are the VAST minority. Thus we couldn't fund the studio without the comp stomp and sp crowds.
They need to make money to continue patching the game. And personally I don't think balance is completely atrocious. It's not perfect either. Optimization isn't. Even still this is the best game I've played in years.

For the record I liked AA but feel I paid too much for it. I'm considering the rest an investment on future work on the game.

I think they will add another faction. It's pretty obvious at this point this game isn't going to be an esport. The balance will be trickier with brits but so what. It's not going to hurt anything and it helps relic stay in business. Not exactly win win but I'm all for it.

I'd say airborne is great. You can skip capt and still get at guns. I generally don't get capt vs wehrmacht. I just steal their pak.

I haven't seen a stuart since I've played war thunder. Wtf is point of stuart? Maybe if it had 400 hp like luchs.

Do you think you strat could work well for rifle? Throw in bars and a flamer or two and generally your second tank is e8. Then again it's kinda over by that point if you've done well. But I think the flamethrower can be great on cqc maps.

It's just crazy with how effective shreks are and how tough volks are. Once they're past vet 2 it's VERY hard to wipe them. The fact that shreks 100% pen all allied armor except maybe four heavies/big mids makes it worse.

Axis have the best infantry at while fighting lighter armor just makes it so that even one volks poses a real threat to a single sherman, even with h.e. rounds. If I see two volks I generally won't even try to engage with armor, which is silly. Imagine if p4s got scared off by rifles with zooks. It just seems like having your cake and eating it too.

I don't think making volks a better ai unit is bad. Having a snare isn't either. I think it could be fixed if they got rid of the insane received accuracy and made something other than shreks to spend munitions on. It should be a bit riskier to make all your front line infantry AT specialists.