Profile of JohnnyB

^Don't forget about offmaps Cruzz.

They have doomsday machine strength and before could not be used more then once, maybe twice. Now with muni conversion you can pretty much use them every 2 mins.

Underpriced flares from specops doctrine are one of the examples of underpriced ability(superior to all other scouts, can't be shot down early, costs least).

I see you didn't mention here the zeroing arty, the arty from breaktrough doctrine and from scavenger doctrine. These are off-maps too and have 2 features:

1. Expensive like shit;
2. To easy avoidable unless you are sleeping with your head on your keyboard or you are AFK for throwing the garbage.

OKW design. Axis fanboys say this word all the time when usf are the subject but when it comes to OKW design has no matter cause okw needs (is okw plural or singular?) 100% ammo.

You seem to totaly ignore the fact that OKW cannot build caches and boost its amo income LIKE OTHER FACTIONS DO. Geez, why everytime I say that everybody seems to ignore it. Caches are important and are definetly a handicap for OKW. And don't give me that conversion thing. That depends on build order (if I start with T2, conversion will begin much later because it's from T3). Further, for building a cache you don't have an income penalty. For conversion, you do.

I have a strange feeling that guys who are defending 100% ammo income (which is against OKW desgin) are the same people who keep saying that USF should not get Pershing cause it's agasint faction design..

Obers and Falls without upgrade are like Paratroopers already equipped with LMGs yet USF need to pay for it.

LOL, verry wrong. You assume that some players lost their reason just because they like OKW. I can search for my posts related to Pershing and post them here to prove you that I have nothing against USF getting the Pershing and even non-doctrinal too.
Related to paying for LMGs or such I disagree though. Remember in most of the games OKW needs to trade amo for fuel and, in addition, cannot build caches and augment their amo income, like all other factions can.

Panzershreks cost 90 munitions each, 85 if you have the 5% off bulletin. What people are essentially asking for is a global nerf to solve what is basically a non issue. If an OKW player invests into 4-5 squads of Volksgrens with Panzershreks.

Oh, that bulletin . Never got it.
But, anyways, I don't get Relic math: Pzgrens are getting 2 schrecks for 120 amo and volks are getting one schreck for 90 amo.

Now some people will say: exactly!! Make Pzgrens schrecks cost 180 amo!

Well, I now understand that the problems with this faction are:

1. People don't understand its architecture, therefore feel frustrated being blinded by facts as "they have the best units",being incapable to evaluate its handicaps;
2. It has alot of haters;
3. The majority of people who whine about OKW didn't play it or played no more than 2-3 games, probably against AI.

Its real problem it's reduced to one word: Kubelwagen. Fix that and everything will be fine.

Well I am indeed curious how OKW will look if/after suggestions on this site would be implemented.
Let's summarize:
1. Nurf JLIs;
2. Nurf kubel;
3. Make OKW pay for their light weapons upgrades (as lmg for instance);
4. Increase fuel costs for truck deployement (aka tear progressing);
5. Bring back OKW to 66% amo income;
6. Nurf Fallschirms;
7. Nurf Puma (hey, it's too god, wtf?!);
8. Nurf KT;
9. Nurf JagdTiger

I am realy curious how much cheesee will become to fight against it. It will probably be an allied tank fest with tens of tanks chasing infantry as rabbits, but I want to see that. And OKW will have then probably 5 players. Meaning top 5 which will still be able to win 50% of their engagements.