Profile of Rocket

Avatar Area

Offline United States
Posts: 728

General Information
Email: wbafnyrf0(ivv)tznvy.pbz
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/jonathan.sales.79
Twitter: @JonSales5
Steam: 76561197972942793
Birthday: 1987-01-23
Residence:

United States
Nationality:

United States
Timezone: America/Indiana/Indianapolis
Game Name: Rocket

Show Latest Posts


Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OKW Feedback14 Jan 2021, 20:53 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Jan 2021, 14:19 PMLady Xenarra Any specifics? If it's the laser guided munitions, they tried scatter in the past and somehow made it even more OP. (I have no idea how ) Stuka did get nerfed this patch, along with all the rocket arty. Make the Rockets hit in a Wide circle area randomly, So its good at saturating areas but not at wiping entire defense lines because it can fire in straight lines, and then it couldnt also retreat path wipe that is always been bs to begin with as on most maps its super predictable. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The price of asymmetrical balance6 Jan 2021, 22:21 PM I would like to see all arty nerfed across the board. Limit priest sexton ml20 lefh to one as well as all rocket arty. It wouldnt effect 1v1 much as generally your not going to make more than 1 of these units to begin with and would do wonders for team games. Less focus on arty more into armor and infantry battles. Im so sick of having to choose rocket or arty commanders as allies and spam them and so sick of axis players being able to just spam bunkers and lefhs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Nading bunkers and emplacement17 Dec 2020, 20:45 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Dec 2020, 20:26 PMVaz You can destroy bunker with the .50 lmao you think that is plausible to do? flanking a fighting position with sturm squad or 2 highly feasible, the bunkers suppress pretty quickly and .50 i dont believe out ranges it to do it from the front In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Nading bunkers and emplacement17 Dec 2020, 19:32 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Dec 2020, 07:17 AMVaz This is simply not true, small arms damages the fighting position Huh I know small arms damage the fighting position and they shouldnt, Sturms at close range can destroy the fighting position with just small arms. Thats dumb and makes no sense small arms cant damage a bunker. It would be like allied infantry destroying bunkers if they flanked it with thompsons In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Nading bunkers and emplacement17 Dec 2020, 02:36 AM well for one Sturm should not be able to kill USf emplacements with small arms thats just kind of silly, 2 sturms behind a usf emplacement can drop it rather fast. Its not like this happens a lot but it can make it rather easy and quick for okw to destroy emplacements especially when they have little risk using their at gun to attack it thanks to the crew being super bullet dodgers and retreat In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Excessive Amount Of Micro Required For Brummbar1 Dec 2020, 15:32 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Nov 2020, 23:52 PMKatitof If he was, there wouldn't be a thread crying to buff one of top 3 strongest and easiest to use AI units in whole game. Glad your back Kaitof lmao In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviets Mark Target1 Dec 2020, 15:13 PM Mark target is fine, holy cow you mean i cant shove a panther in your azz and use it as a MG carrier. Try using any sherman its like it has permanent mark target on its back. Keep in mind they also want to nerf 152 to make it dangerous to use it how most people do with its AI rounds, more the reason mark target shouldnt change as they want to make the 152 into a sitting duck. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Bipolar Nature of Cav Rifles18 Nov 2020, 18:37 PM They would be borderline useless with out at satchel exaxtly the way it is. They also get shitted on by simply focus firing them already. They are good at countering unsupported mg,s dropping them off with the jeep, but overall they are lackluster. The at satchel at least gives them some late game utility. Imo they should come out at T0 with thompsons and at satchel locked behind 1 cp. idt it would hurt for them to get some kind of armor vet bonuses to make them more combat viable later game, right now late game they cant do much and putting bars on them only feels like it makes them worse. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M4A3E8 - Rifle Company USF26 Oct 2020, 19:00 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Oct 2020, 12:40 PMTomDRV - M4A3E8 Sherman: Fast, flanking anti-tank Sherman (Doctrinal) Old moving accuracy returned. The ez8 is way slower than rest of the shermans check stats, and for no apparent reason. It cant flank shit. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF armour10 Oct 2020, 17:29 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Oct 2020, 11:36 AMSander93 The M4A3 and 76m Shermans are basically just as fast as the Panther (6.4 and 6.5 vs 6.6 speed) with the exception of the Easy 8 with 6.1. Engine damage critical speed penalty is identical for all vehicles. A snared M4A3/76 is just as slow as a snared Panther and infantry can quite easily keep up in either case. The Luchs isn't faster than the Stuart or the AEC. It has 6.7 speed while the Stuart has 7 and the AEC has 7.2. You might want to play some Axis games or at least check facts before throwing around completely biased (and wrong) remarks. Acceleration thats how fast they get up to top speed or “move” basicly shermans really slow panther again faster, why? I should use tin can shermans to flank when they just get snared since even axis call in infantry the majority has smares lol, so it can get chased down by panther. Are you sure about the snare i thought it was a percentage of vehicles speed, could be the using blitzkreig in reverse 😂 that ones always cool by time riflemen snare goes off its in fog of war. No reason call in shermans cant be one tick faster than panther, they have more armor and more hp ypur beloved panthers will be fine, not now though ill keep spamming tds yawn In: COH2 Balance