Why is it only axis that can faust buildings?
It gives good xp to the infantry, so allies should be able too well!
Nading bunkers and emplacement
16 Dec 2020, 16:13 PM
#1
Posts: 469
16 Dec 2020, 16:16 PM
#2
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Why is that a problem?
The only less efficient use for muni is dropping offmaps on your own troops.
The only less efficient use for muni is dropping offmaps on your own troops.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
16 Dec 2020, 17:21 PM
#3
Posts: 469
I had a game where my vet 0 grenadier fausted an usf bunker twice and got vet 1 because of that, allies need that as well.
16 Dec 2020, 18:04 PM
#4
Posts: 268
50 muniton for vet 1 on grens is not worth it.
17 Dec 2020, 02:36 AM
#5
Posts: 728
well for one Sturm should not be able to kill USf emplacements with small arms thats just kind of silly, 2 sturms behind a usf emplacement can drop it rather fast. Its not like this happens a lot but it can make it rather easy and quick for okw to destroy emplacements especially when they have little risk using their at gun to attack it thanks to the crew being super bullet dodgers and retreat
17 Dec 2020, 07:17 AM
#6
Posts: 1158
Why is that a problem?
The only less efficient use for muni is dropping offmaps on your own troops.
One game I had a teamate that used some UKF arty (it was like the rail artillery) and he's blobbing around the target area fighting, one of the shells comes down and eliminates his own entire blob, he had 0 units left! Rage quit of course, lmao
well for one Sturm should not be able to kill USf emplacements with small arms thats just kind of silly, 2 sturms behind a usf emplacement can drop it rather fast. Its not like this happens a lot but it can make it rather easy and quick for okw to destroy emplacements especially when they have little risk using their at gun to attack it thanks to the crew being super bullet dodgers and retreat
This is simply not true, small arms damages the fighting position
29 Jul 2014, 12:16 PM by siuking666:
T34/76 is NOT a joke on my hands; Maybe on your hands you make it suck shit? but on me, No. I can kill a stug with a little micro, go toe to toe with a Panzer 4. Is it a joke? LOL T34/85 is apparently a very good tank. But no one says it "one hit wipe" or elefant penetration; up to a point i think this little medium tank just have too much health and too much firepower with that fuel cost.
17 Dec 2020, 19:32 PM
#7
Posts: 728
This is simply not true, small arms damages the fighting position
Huh I know small arms damage the fighting position and they shouldnt, Sturms at close range can destroy the fighting position with just small arms. Thats dumb and makes no sense small arms cant damage a bunker.
It would be like allied infantry destroying bunkers if they flanked it with thompsons
17 Dec 2020, 20:26 PM
#8
Posts: 1158
You can destroy bunker with the .50
29 Jul 2014, 12:16 PM by siuking666:
T34/76 is NOT a joke on my hands; Maybe on your hands you make it suck shit? but on me, No. I can kill a stug with a little micro, go toe to toe with a Panzer 4. Is it a joke? LOL T34/85 is apparently a very good tank. But no one says it "one hit wipe" or elefant penetration; up to a point i think this little medium tank just have too much health and too much firepower with that fuel cost.
17 Dec 2020, 20:45 PM
#9
Posts: 728
You can destroy bunker with the .50
lmao you think that is plausible to do? flanking a fighting position with sturm squad or 2 highly feasible, the bunkers suppress pretty quickly and .50 i dont believe out ranges it to do it from the front
18 Dec 2020, 07:43 AM
#10
Posts: 307
18 Dec 2020, 08:26 AM
#11
Posts: 1158
Why is this hard to grasp? Anything the .50 can do the mg42(vet1) can do better. It's just penetration, maybe one of the stat monkeys will come in here and prove it with numbers. For best results get to close range and activate armor piercing on the .50 or rainbow rounds on the mg42. The .50 needs 2 activations iirc. MG42 might be able to do it in 1 activation. MG34 has rainbow rounds too, right? DSHK might do something but regular sov hmg will take 10 min(I'm sure it will still work). Not sure about vickers, I think it can go fuck itself too for 10 minutes.
Is it plausible to do? YES! I've been doing it quite a bit in team games when I drive off enemy forces after flanking the emplacement.
Is it plausible to do? YES! I've been doing it quite a bit in team games when I drive off enemy forces after flanking the emplacement.
29 Jul 2014, 12:16 PM by siuking666:
T34/76 is NOT a joke on my hands; Maybe on your hands you make it suck shit? but on me, No. I can kill a stug with a little micro, go toe to toe with a Panzer 4. Is it a joke? LOL T34/85 is apparently a very good tank. But no one says it "one hit wipe" or elefant penetration; up to a point i think this little medium tank just have too much health and too much firepower with that fuel cost.
18 Dec 2020, 16:36 PM
#12
Posts: 4474
while it could as well be removed , what is the problem ? panzrfaust does 100 damage and nades does 80 , if u are using it vs bunkers pen does not matters so u can just chuck nades too , u lose 20 damage but it has more range + arc if u want to see cons and pros vs bunkers
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
19 Dec 2020, 07:41 AM
#13
Posts: 486
The .50 cal has 1 real advantage over MG42, Pack up and placement speed. Its a HUGE difference being changed this patch.
19 Dec 2020, 16:15 PM
#14
Posts: 1158
I destroyed a bunker with .50 this morning. 1 burst of ap rounds dropped something like 30% of the bunker health at point blank. That bunker was gone real damn quick. This fucked up game is so stupid sometimes, you can destroy a bunker with a machine gun faster than launching mortars. So, we're going to have nerf ap rounds. Not the rainbow rounds though, don't want to make the game EVEN harder for axis. Just nerf the .50
29 Jul 2014, 12:16 PM by siuking666:
T34/76 is NOT a joke on my hands; Maybe on your hands you make it suck shit? but on me, No. I can kill a stug with a little micro, go toe to toe with a Panzer 4. Is it a joke? LOL T34/85 is apparently a very good tank. But no one says it "one hit wipe" or elefant penetration; up to a point i think this little medium tank just have too much health and too much firepower with that fuel cost.
21 Dec 2020, 03:32 AM
#15
Posts: 307
I destroyed a bunker with .50 this morning. 1 burst of ap rounds dropped something like 30% of the bunker health at point blank. That bunker was gone real damn quick. This fucked up game is so stupid sometimes, you can destroy a bunker with a machine gun faster than launching mortars. So, we're going to have nerf ap rounds. Not the rainbow rounds though, don't want to make the game EVEN harder for axis. Just nerf the .50
and enemies let you doing that ? seriously
21 Dec 2020, 23:15 PM
#16
Posts: 148
it used to be 1 molotov + few shot from rifle / 1 ost bunker
now it take 3 or 4
now it take 3 or 4
22 Dec 2020, 05:48 AM
#17
Posts: 1158
and enemies let you doing that ? seriously
Driving someone off a position happens. I do actually win battles, even if I get pwned later for the game.
29 Jul 2014, 12:16 PM by siuking666:
T34/76 is NOT a joke on my hands; Maybe on your hands you make it suck shit? but on me, No. I can kill a stug with a little micro, go toe to toe with a Panzer 4. Is it a joke? LOL T34/85 is apparently a very good tank. But no one says it "one hit wipe" or elefant penetration; up to a point i think this little medium tank just have too much health and too much firepower with that fuel cost.
22 Dec 2020, 15:32 PM
#18
Posts: 5279
it used to be 1 molotov + few shot from rifle / 1 ost bunker
now it take 3 or 4
When brits released. I remeber that. It was the only time I actually saw people teching molitovs...
#stalinwept
23 Dec 2020, 04:26 AM
#19
Posts: 783
When brits released. I remeber that. It was the only time I actually saw people teching molitovs...
3-4 con molo used to be a fairly common soviet build before WFA.
23 Dec 2020, 05:23 AM
#20
Posts: 5279
3-4 con molo used to be a fairly common soviet build before WFA.
I don't recall that. Is it still when it could random death crit and was like 10mu?
#stalinwept
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
14 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
281 | ||
 |
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
0 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1099614.642-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1231
Board Info
360 users are online:
360 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49062
Welcome our newest member, Mclatc16
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Mclatc16
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM