Profile of KT610

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 69

General Information


Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback23 Dec 2020, 20:05 PM Could Conscripts be made to throw molotovs at a reasonable speed, in their current state it takes far too long. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback23 Dec 2020, 19:51 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2020, 11:37 AMthedarkarmadillo Doesn't matter how they have always been used if it's incorrect to how they are meant to be used. The m10 always was used as the best AI vehicle in the game until it wasn't because that was not how it was supposed to be used. Ostroppen are bodies for a fragile faction, not infantry replacements Moving Osttruppen to t1 in there current state will kill two doctrines, all I'm asking for is a minor improvement to their combat ability by removing their out of cover penalty to compensate for being move to t1. They will still be the worst then Grens in everyway except for manpower cost. Osttruppen: damage 8 x squad size 6 = total damage 48 (10 shots to kill one model) Accuracy near 0.633 (When in cover) Accuracy mid 0.598 (When in cover) Accuracy far 0.564 (When in cover) vet 3 Accuracy near 0.8862 Accuracy mid 0.8372 Accuracy far 0.7896 Grenadiers damage 16 x squad size 4 = total damage 64 (5 shots to kill one model) Accuracy near 0.748 Accuracy mid 0.661 Accuracy far 0.598 Vet3 Accuracy near 1.0472 Accuracy mid 0.9254 Accuracy far 0.8372 https://coh2.serealia.ca/#65 where I got the stats In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback23 Dec 2020, 00:12 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2020, 00:04 AMKatitof And miss the whole point of osttruppen in the process? They are cheap meatshields. They were never meant to completely replace grens in any way, but to support them. The change brings them closer to that role. They will still be cheap meatshields, and have always been used as a replacement for grens In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback22 Dec 2020, 23:59 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Dec 2020, 23:48 PMKatitof Osttruppen reserves at mobile defense commander arrive at 3(4?) CP and they still have it, so timing is no argument in any way. Also, it would make them insanely OP. They still are 20% cheaper and don't bleed much. Just raise thier cost to compensate for thier improved combat ability, I wouldn't mind paying 230 to 240 for Osttruppen if it means they are decent at fighting In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback22 Dec 2020, 23:43 PM If Osttruppen are going to T1 then could you please remove their out of cover penalty. Their gimmick of being garbage out of cover was fine when you could get them out faster than Grens, but now they're going to need some kind of buff to make someone be willing to take them over grens. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OKW Feedback15 Dec 2020, 22:03 PM Maybe its something for the next patch, but I think the Breakthrough Sturm Officer should be given to Battlegroup HQ. two reason why I think this would be a good change: 1. Sturm Officer is currently in a doctrine that's very rarely going to be picked for 1v1 2. Battlegroup HQ only has two combat units while Mechanized HQ has 3 Breakthrough would require something to replace the Sturm officer perhaps the SdKfz 251/1 Half-track, the StuG III Ausf. G, or something else In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Osttruppen Discussion and Feedback15 Dec 2020, 21:16 PM If osttruppen go up in cost. They should have their out of cover penalty removed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback14 Dec 2020, 05:20 AM Could the conscript ppsh upgrade get a buff? How about change it so when cons get PPSHs their molotovs get replaced with RG-42 Anti-Personnel Grenade. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback14 Dec 2020, 00:31 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Dec 2020, 00:13 AMKatitof For the bazzilionth time, they DO NOT HAVE ANY COVER BONUS. THEY HAVE OUT OF COVER PENALTY. The DPS on the stat pages? That is the DPS they have IN cover. this is arguing semantics. The point is Sections get benefits from cover that improve their dps, and suggesting I'm that bonus/ability to remove out of cover penalty is moved to vet1. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback14 Dec 2020, 00:08 AM Infantry section cover bonus should be moved to vet 1. This would slightly reduce their early game perform, but leave their late game performance unchanged. In: COH2 Balance