Profile of KT610

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 69

General Information


Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback5 Jan 2021, 20:19 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 19:41 PMelchino7 Thank you, I've made adjustments to my original post. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback5 Jan 2021, 18:44 PM I did a some Testing of V5 with VSL with an stg44, and here are my suggestions: STG increase the STG damage from 4 to 5 Current damage potential vet0 range 0 (7.52 DPS) range 15 (5.57 DPS) range 30 (2.894) New damage potential vet0 range 0 (9.4 DPS) range 15 (6.9625 DPS) range 30 (3.6175 DPS) Pgren STG damage potential (for comparison) vet0 range 0 (15.492 DPS) range 15 (9.214 DPS) range 30 (2.767 DPS) BAR damage potential (for comparison) vet0 range 0 (13.204 DPS) range 15 (6.502 DPS) range 30 (4.202 DPS) https://coh2.serealia.ca/ Grenade VSL and G43 upgrades should replace the rifle Grenade with Model 24 grenades In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback3 Jan 2021, 02:29 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Jan 2021, 01:26 AMthedarkarmadillo I too would like to see penals made cheaper and with a munitions upgrade. It helps smooth out the power spike of penals that's only acceptable because they cost 460mp to get one out AND delay your capping by needing the CE to build it. Could then have mobilize reserves reduce the muni cost - the late game timing would help offset rebuying them if you lose one without making them too cheap early on and snowball. Penal rework idea cost reduced from 300 to 280 squad size decreased from 6 to 5 New upgrade available "Commissar" (60 munitions requires mobilized reserves ) Penals gain: squad size increased from 5 to 6 (commissar model armed with penal SVT) squad gains +20% increased vet gain, +10% weapon cooldown, and -15% received damage In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback3 Jan 2021, 00:00 AM I think what penals really need is to be made cheaper maybe drop thier cost from 300 to 280. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback31 Dec 2020, 05:39 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Dec 2020, 22:27 PMWiderstreit I would like to see: HQ: - Pionier - Grenadier (from T1 to HQ) T1: - HMG42 (from HQ to T1) - Osttruppen (Commannder) - Mörser - Scharfschütze T2: - Panzergrenadier (from HQ+tech to T2) - SdKfz.222 - SdKfz.251 - PaK40 Improved role of Grenadiers in early game, less Osttruppen and more difficult Osttruppen+HMG/Sniper combo, later Panzergrenadiers. Maybe give Grenadiers a vet1 shock-grenade (like Assault-Pios) to improve theim. (+ change the commander-ability) HQ: - Pionier - Grenadier (from T1 to HQ) T1: - HMG42 (from HQ to T1) - Osttruppen (Commannder) - Panzergrenadier (requires Battle Phase 1) - Mörser - Scharfschütze - Unlocks Panzerfausts for Grenadiers I Think moving Pgrens to T1 but still require Battle phase, and having T1 required for Panzerfausts. Would buff Grens and make T1 effectively mandatory for Ostheer. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback30 Dec 2020, 03:25 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Dec 2020, 00:36 AMthedarkarmadillo Nothing complements an aggressive semi automatic rifle infantry with a hyper close range explosive and increased stats for every man lost like a long range, static weapon best suited for sitting in cover... 1. Riflemen are also aggressive semi automatic rifle infantry that can be given LMGs. Sure most of the time its better to give them BARS, but Some Maps favor LMGS. 2. Obers get bundle grenades a Strong short range explosive and they get LMGs 3. "To the Last Man" buffs the squad as men die it does not matter if die at max or close range the sqaud still gets the buffs 4. By vet3 penals gain two +30% accuracy and would be quite strong upgraded with DP-28s Giving Penals more Tactical flexibility would help them come back into the meta. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback29 Dec 2020, 21:32 PM Any thoughts on giving Penals access to Dp-28s? I would be more willing to take Penals over cons if they got some anti-infantry upgrades as an alternative to PTRS. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback27 Dec 2020, 04:32 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Dec 2020, 21:00 PMWiderstreit Merge with only team-weapons is also an interesting idea, also Cons should only be able to merge with team-weapons too. (and other cons) Edit: Other idea: - need CP1. - build-able in HQ - 210mp - 5men squad -> 6th men passive with battle-phase-2 - LMG42 removed - 2 weapon-slots Other idea: - make them non-doc (Osttruppen-Commander gets Beute-T34/76 as call-in \| Def.-Commander gets hull-down instead) - build-able in T2 - 200mp - 6men squad - LMG42 removed - 2 weapon-slots how about this -built at t1 -200 mp -6 man squad -lmg42 removed -squad reinforce cost increased from 16 to 18 -t4 "All out war" cost bonus removed -New upgrade added "Ostlegionen" (costs 60 munitions requires Battle phase 1) Osttruppen gain: squad size increased from 6 to 7 out of cover penalty removed reinforce cost decreased from 18 to 16 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback23 Dec 2020, 23:04 PM Suggestions for Ottruppen changes since they are being moved to T1: squad cost from 200 to 220 Out of cover penalty removed slot weapon accuracy penalty removed LMG42 upgrade removed merge ability added (cannot merge with Grenadiers or Panzer grenadiers) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback23 Dec 2020, 20:34 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2020, 20:27 PMDescolata Dont you love the Dance of the Rodina? I do love the Dance of the Rodina, but if we are to beat the Western Capitalists to Berlin the Conscripts must throw faster! In: COH2 Balance