Profile of ElSlayer

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198020912674


Thread: Tiger PzKpfw VI8 Feb 2019, 12:43 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Feb 2019, 12:32 PMBananenheld Since jacksons hardcounters every vehicle, and jackson is build nearly every game..you should not build any tanks anymore? I have problems winning the infantry game against vetted, double equipped rifles, but could be my lack of skill Could be, as your opponent invested X amount of resources in pure AT unit and you still can't beat him in AI. Not sure about 1v1 as I don't play it, but according to casts that I watched Pz.IV is perfectly viable in matchup vs USF. The idea of sitting on fuel just to build slow fat target and be outranged looks indeed bad. 4v4 is completely another beast. You can pretty much spam rocket artillery instead of tanks(if you see enemy is investing heavily in AT units) and be totally fine. You just need to mine flanks in order to avoid throw-away medium tank rush for your rocket artillery. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger PzKpfw VI8 Feb 2019, 12:20 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Feb 2019, 01:44 AMPrinceps How many games u played where u got 1 Jackson and the enemy 1 Tiger ....? This is no test ground here. U cant simplify this with "compare the cost" and than its done. The whole game is abaout timing and minutemarks where something can hit the field. The Map design... Inf support.. Doctrines.. and so on. Now u bring the Tiger and there are 1-2 Jacksons with Vet on the field. If we talk about timings... So, in presented scenario, assuming both players have exact same fuel income - USF player just builds Jackson first then sits with it around doing mostly nothing (maybe wrecking a LV or two), waiting for you to accumulate your extra 125 fuel (or whatever the difference between Jackson and Tiger costs), then you call in Tiger and he builds 2nd one? Where did they got vet? Why would you go for a Tiger if there is counter for it on the field already? Jump back to quoted post8 Feb 2019, 01:44 AMPrinceps Its more the "selfspotting" Stuff. Another Unit where u get Maximum efficiency by 0 micro. If this is what you really think than it is obvious that you've NEVER in your life tried to micro 2 SU-85 and utilize self-spotting ability. Jump back to quoted post8 Feb 2019, 12:17 PMVipper Nice theory but it completely wrong. M36 can be disembarked in which case the total pop is 8. (even when crewed M36 has a pop 16 so the total is 32% not 40%) I'm sorry, I don't get it - What is "completely wrong" in theory that you shouldn't invest 230 fuel into unit which hard counters are already present on the field? Having opponent to have 16 pop and 720 MP and 270 FUEL (don't remember exact cost of M36, but it doesn't matter here) sitting without job, since they don't affect your infantry in any way, is completely wrong strategy? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Nice Balance Patxh RELIC!8 Feb 2019, 09:58 AM REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE It is better this way rather than Relic's Classic Triple Nerf Into Oblivion™ In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger PzKpfw VI6 Feb 2019, 07:30 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Feb 2019, 04:44 AMClarity Allowing the Tiger to bounce frontal shots a little more often I think would make it a bit more balanced. AT Gun walls and a Single Tank Destroyer seem to be able to shut the Tiger down these days pretty easily. Although I would like to see all call-ins get tied to tech. Or maybe... just maybe... AT gun walls should be able to shut it down and it is fine? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: I think the comet tank is due for a buff.5 Feb 2019, 14:13 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Feb 2019, 03:29 AMLoopDloop [...] That’s a pretty interesting idea. Its main gun dps would probably have to go up too to avoid it getting facerolled by panthers though. Or maaaaaybe it is intended for it to get facerolled by Panther in prolonged face-to-face brawling and you should use it together with PIATs, AT gun or Firefly. Comet should be T-34-85 with tea flavor. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Axis panzershrek spam blobs- i'm losing it4 Feb 2019, 15:34 PM What a disgusting act of necromancy. Don't even try to bring up volksschrek blobs back from the dead. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind29 Jan 2019, 11:26 AM Buff its anti-air, nerf AA of pintle MGs and 222. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UKF(British) is underpower29 Jan 2019, 09:48 AM Your british rank shows only your standing among other british players. If you lost some rank points after patch that means other BRIT players have managed to #ADAPT to changes and you have not. It has nothing to do with Brit balance. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: V1 rockets for OKW?29 Jan 2019, 08:58 AM I don't think that this game needs another point and click bombing ability. These abilities contradict with main selling points of CoH - positioning and unit preservation. I mean... look how often people rage about arty spam deleting their units and how often people cum into their pants when they see vet 5 Kubel or King Tiger. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Would Tech Heavies Be Game Breaking?25 Jan 2019, 13:39 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Jan 2019, 13:15 PMOnimusha The limited heavyes are only tanks with good ai and at capability, kt , tiger and is2 are a no brainer choice cause they are strong all around tanks. When you go for kv-1 , well, you know the downside of your move, but when you call in big heavyes, no downside. There is downside. You have ~50% of your popcap in heavy tanks and fair amount in repair squads. 2 TDs will counter that for much less investment. You won't have sufficient infantry force to hold VPs. I think game will balance it out by itself, no need to artificially limit player's army composition. In: COH2 Balance