Penals Redesign
Posts: 711
Only one faction in COH2 have 2 stock mainline infantry units: Soviets. After WFA, nerf maxims and cons, we've got situation when SU to become playable faction got strong "WFA level" mainline infantry. And penals becomes this uhit. They are passed through many changes and tweaks. But now, i think, SU must get, like other nations, only 1 mainline infantry unit - cons. All possible soilutions about penals, IMHO, should get support from T1, not any sorts of mainline infantry.
I think there are few options:
1. Redesign penals
2. Replace penals by other unit
Redesign
Penals should, IMHO, become unit closer to Pgrens in terms of design (closer to support unit, not mainline infantry). Close combat upgrade and dedicated AT upgrade.
Starting as 4 mens with 2 ppsh and 2 svt, 280 MP. Could get next upgrades:
1. Close-combat package (60 muni): +1 ppsh and flamethrower with regular satchel, will get +1 man with SVT when T4 is deployed or Mobile Reserve purchased in T3, get molotovs from molotov upgrade.
2. AT-package (75 muni): get 3 PTRS rifles (1 ppsh is still remain), ability Like brit sniper have (shot to weak points), ability like guards have (bonus to sight and range, but becomes unmoved). Get at-satchel from At-nade upgrade. Will get +1 man with mosin when T4 is deployed or Mobile Reserve purchased in T3.
Replace
The most hardest way, in my opinion. If T1 don't have any "main" unit, it will become dead tech structure. Only fews will be build T1 to get sniper and M3.
Possible units:
1. Officer - strong unit, limited to 1 squad, cost 360 MP. 5 mens - 2 ppsh, 2 mosins and 1 nagan. With vet all squad get ppsh (officer still have nagan).
- Frag grenade
- "Commander spirit" - passive aura, decrease time of recharge abilities to units. CE build faster buildings and barbwire with mines.
- "Inspire" - work like the same ability fom kv-8
- "Coordinated barrage" - all zis-guns and su-76 start to barrage in choosed area.
- "Overwatch" - significantly decrease time of production and time of reinforce when activated in main base sector. Need some time to work on full speed.
Posts: 1096
Conscripts would fare better from something like this perhaps?
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
We should talk about the global redesign of the Soviet infantry, and not about how to fix an unnecessary unit.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
T0: Combat engineers, Conscripts
T1: Dshka, M3A1, Penals
T2: Zis-3, Mortar, Sniper
T3: M5, T70, SU76
T4: T34/76, SU85, Katyusha
Get rid of 6 man teams and keep all soviet support teams at 5 men. Conscripts stay as 6 men and buffed, with stock SVT package upgrade for 4 SVTs. AT nade, Molotov and SVT package unlock into a single sidetech. Penals become a 240mp unit holding 6 conscript mosins with satchel and a flamethrower upgrade. Maxim replaces Dshka as a doctrinal mg and gets reworked, though in my honest opinion because of the deathloop it needs to be removed from the game.
T1 and T2 is the same choice as LT vs Cpt: Mobile vs Static. Both have strong anti infantry and strong anti tank, with the M3A1 getting a slight bonus to mg penetration to work alongside the Dshka to keep light vehicles away.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Penals nerf:
Respective tech gets a name change.
Satchel requires Molotov upgrade.
PTRS requires AT nade upgrade.
Now you adjust Conscript without fear (make 7man upgrade come free at T3 requiring both AT/Molo upgrade but without the buff and only reinforce cost reduce. Performance upgrades unlocks with T4) and possible Maxim.
Posts: 4928
Conscripts cannot fight very well, they bleed manpower and do little damage. This forces players to rely heavily on Commanders or Penal Troops as a fighting force.
Posts: 2243
Penals are not the problem, the problem is that Conscripts don't stack up to LMG Grenadiers or STG Volksgrenadiers, their lack of firepower has always held them back and does not reflect the Red Army.
Conscripts cannot fight very well, they bleed manpower and do little damage. This forces players to rely heavily on Commanders or Penal Troops as a fighting force.
thats why they are supercheap and has much more utiltys than other mainline squad. And get the right doc (meta) and wonder how great they fight with any weapon upgrade and 7models.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
thats why they are supercheap and has much more utiltys than other mainline squad. And get the right doc (meta) and wonder how great they fight with any weapon upgrade and 7models.
(psst, lil secret for you: grens are super cheap as well and 4 cons with AT nade upgrade cost considerably more then 4 grens to the point if that cost was rolled into the unit, it would have to roflstomp grens without issues to live up to that cost)
(psst2, lil secret 2: cons can't get 7th man and any weapon upgrade, because these are mutually exclusive)
Posts: 1979
thats why they are supercheap and has much more utiltys than other mainline squad. And get the right doc (meta) and wonder how great they fight with any weapon upgrade and 7models.
grens and cons cost the same to both build and reinforce...
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
thats why they are supercheap and has much more utiltys than other mainline squad. And get the right doc (meta) and wonder how great they fight with any weapon upgrade and 7models.
Please outline in what way they are cheaper and better than Grenadiers.
Posts: 1289
Please outline in what way they are cheaper and better than Grenadiers.
They believe that 20mp reinforce per model vs 30/25 per model for grens and volks is a big reason they are supposedly cheap. They forget the 1.089 rec acc they have makes them drop models very easy esp early on, more so then any other main line. For being "cheap" they can bleed you dry handely. Them eating muni to is overlooked as well.
That cons start with 3 abilities ( merge oorah sandbags ) most main inf start with 2 or less, is also used to justify them being supposedly cheap. But those other inf have better base preformance then cons d. People forget that cons are the only inf that have side tech specificly for them, those cost add to the base price depending on how many cons you get. It jacks up their price.
Just to get them basic snare and worse version of incindiary nade, and the 7th man while imo a worhty upgrade adds even more cost to them if you want it early in t3.
Posts: 1289
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Please outline in what way they are cheaper and better than Grenadiers.
inb4 "they reinforce for less" when 5x 20 is 100 and 3x30 is 90 for full squad reinforce and half a squad reinforce(more likely to happen as no one sane stays to the last man) is 60 for both.
Posts: 2243
Please outline in what way they are cheaper and better than Grenadiers.
you compare here a t0 unit vs a t1 unit which need a separate building. and you compare a 4model squad vs a 6(7) model squad. There are plenty advantages to have high model squads (merge cons with teamweapon on front, dont get unlucky wipes, can easily recrew weapons and have 3 models left(grens often cant recrewing because one model was killed))
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
you compare here a t0 unit vs a t1 unit which need a separate building.
Really?
You HONESTLY believe these 10 seconds make a difference?
Grasping at straws much?
Its not soviet T1 we're talking here, but ost one, which comes out faster then you can screech "nerf allies" .
Posts: 711
you compare here a t0 unit vs a t1 unit which need a separate building. and you compare a 4model squad vs a 6(7) model squad. There are plenty advantages to have high model squads (merge cons with teamweapon on front, dont get unlucky wipes, can easily recrew weapons and have 3 models left(grens often cant recrewing because one model was killed))
Cons need separate upgrades to AT-nade and molotovs, that both cost like T1 OST building IRC. With OST T1 you got mainline infantry that work without any sidetech from early to late game. No one will be play through cons without at least AT-nades. About recrewing - yes, but SU have only one viable team weapon that you can see every game through T2 - zis gun. Also as was shown in recent topic about suppression mechanic - bigger squads got suppression faster than smaller.
Cons have worse RA than grens and when grens get their weapon upgrades, they die like flies. You need wait until your T4 will be deployed to upgrade them.
Posts: 1392
Now we can make a real penal-troup for a future commander or revamp.
Posts: 2358
I would agree to lock satchel with molo or even better, unlock molos and make them free and make the same tech unlock both AT satchel (when upgraded) and explosive satchel
Posts: 1979
Rename them to "siberian reserve" and hide their weapon-up-greade like @Elchino said: Satchel requires Molotov upgrade. PTRS requires AT nade upgrade.
Now we can make a real penal-troup for a future commander or revamp.
u could just call them strelki...
what penals need is less earlygame powerspike and more lategame scaling....
i propose to give the new "strelki" a copy of the volksgrenadier KAR and target size and a normal grenade + satchels removed from strelki... but 6 man instead of 5 man priced at 280mp.... with 2 exclusive upgrades panzerfusillier style...
a lategame AI the ability to upgrade to 2/3 DP-28s (depending on what seems balanced)...
a mutually exclusive antitank upgrade with AT satchels + regular satchels and PTRS + rifle sprint (not oorah)
Posts: 4474
Penals are not the problem, the problem is that Conscripts don't stack up to LMG Grenadiers or STG Volksgrenadiers, their lack of firepower has always held them back and does not reflect the Red Army.try using the 7 men upgrade
Conscripts cannot fight very well, they bleed manpower and do little damage. This forces players to rely heavily on Commanders or Penal Troops as a fighting force.
Livestreams
43 | |||||
2 | |||||
721 | |||||
29 | |||||
29 | |||||
27 | |||||
16 | |||||
9 | |||||
5 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.35057.860+15
- 3.1110614.644+11
- 4.624225.735+2
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.919405.694+3
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Cummings
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM