Login

russian armor

Why is there so much crying over Maxim spam?

  • This thread is locked
18 Sep 2019, 14:23 PM
#21
avatar of Grumpy

Posts: 1958

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Sep 2019, 14:09 PMFarlion
You can tell which players in this thread are good and which aren't.

Ignoring that the Maxim can pack up and deploy instantly, thus reacting to flanks much better than the MG42, is definitely the sign of being bad, or just incredibly biased.


The irony in this post is incredible. Maxim times were nerfed many patches ago.
18 Sep 2019, 14:30 PM
#22
avatar of Farlion

Posts: 379 | Subs: 1


It doesn't matter if it actually could reposition quickly (it can't anymore, shows how much you use it) as long as it can't actually do anything while shooting at the enemy. What's more, it moves as quickly as the enemy, so if you do have to reposition (like say there is a volks squad heading directly at your mg, frontally) you won't be able to set up in time to actually start no applying Supression anyways. The nearly time you need to respond to a threat is the same as an mg42, the difference is that if and mg42 does reposition and start shooting the enemy starts eating dirt.


Nonsense. Compare the time it takes to pack up an MG42 and then see how long it takes to reposition a Maxim. You're also conveniently ignoring the actual point of this thread, namely Maxim spam. So when one Maxim has to redeploy, another can easily cover it.

Your last point is also incorrect. The Maxim is much, much more capable to respond to a sudden threat than the MG42. Of course, if you mindless try to bash your head in by charging it frontally, of course the MG42 will suppress faster, that is it's strength and why it takes significantly longer to redeploy.

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Sep 2019, 14:23 PMGrumpy


The irony in this post is incredible. Maxim times were nerfed many patches ago.


This is a very bad post. It says nothing and ignores everything I said. The deploy time of the Maxim hasn't been touched in years.
18 Sep 2019, 14:33 PM
#23
avatar of Aarotron

Posts: 563

Id define all mg spam infuriating, instead of throwing bias of certain factions mg being more annoying.
18 Sep 2019, 14:34 PM
#24
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Sep 2019, 14:30 PMFarlion

Your last point is also incorrect. The Maxim is much, much more capable to respond to a sudden threat than the MG42. Of course, if you mindless try to bash your head in by charging it frontally, of course the MG42 will suppress faster, that is it's strength and why it takes significantly longer to redeploy.


"The mg42 will suppress faster cause that's it's strength"

They are MGs!!! Suppression is their only fucking job, you're basically saying that maxim is better at running away. It's setup time is not fast at all anymore. It only packs up faster (as long as it's not getting deathlooped)
18 Sep 2019, 14:40 PM
#25
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

I feel the need to remind people that there was a time that maxim could sprint and could pack unpack very fast making very difficult to flank especially with units with relatively low mid to close DPS.
18 Sep 2019, 14:51 PM
#26
avatar of Satania McDowell

Posts: 7

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post18 Sep 2019, 14:40 PMVipper
I feel the need to remind people that there was a time that maxim could sprint and could pack unpack very fast making very difficult to flank especially with units with relatively low mid to close DPS.


That time is not the current timeline anymore
18 Sep 2019, 14:55 PM
#27
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

I don't think anyone wants the old Maxim back. Just want the current one to actually do it's job
18 Sep 2019, 15:38 PM
#28
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1



That time is not the current timeline anymore

I simply reminded some facts since some people where arguing about how easy/difficult it was to flank a maxim. That really depends at what point.
18 Sep 2019, 16:16 PM
#29
avatar of Farlion

Posts: 379 | Subs: 1



"The mg42 will suppress faster cause that's it's strength"

They are MGs!!! Suppression is their only fucking job, you're basically saying that maxim is better at running away. It's setup time is not fast at all anymore. It only packs up faster (as long as it's not getting deathlooped)


False on all counts. It is significantly faster than the MG42.

Second, you can't have a six man, fast deploying MG squad on top of good suppression. If you don't like the Maxim, there's always the Dhsk.
18 Sep 2019, 16:22 PM
#30
avatar of Blebfeesh

Posts: 129

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Sep 2019, 16:16 PMFarlion


False on all counts. It is significantly faster than the MG42.

Second, you can't have a six man, fast deploying MG squad on top of good suppression. If you don't like the Maxim, there's always the Dhsk.


The redeployment time being 1-2 seconds slower is negligible once you consider both the wider arc and better suppression. A flanking squad can get a nade off on a freshly repositioned maxim far easier than a freshly repositioned mg42 when it suppresses and pins so quickly. The age old rule still Applies. If a decrewed maxim or Mg42 is on the field, You take the 42.
18 Sep 2019, 16:47 PM
#31
avatar of CODGUY

Posts: 888

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Sep 2019, 16:16 PMFarlion


False on all counts. It is significantly faster than the MG42.

Second, you can't have a six man, fast deploying MG squad on top of good suppression. If you don't like the Maxim, there's always the Dhsk.


MG42 spam is much worse than Maxim for the following reasons:

- The MG42 is available immediately and requires no teching or building construction whatsoever

- The MG42 has a much wider arch than a Maxim and pins instantly in almost every situation

- The MG42 in fact is considered the best MG in the game when all it's stats and abilities are taken into account

- despite being the best MG in the game it's also among the cheapest (only Maxim is cheaper) and is only 1 of 2 that is available immediately
18 Sep 2019, 17:19 PM
#32
avatar of insaneHoshi

Posts: 911

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Sep 2019, 16:47 PMCODGUY


MG42 spam is much worse than Maxim for the following reasons:

- The MG42 is available immediately and requires no teching or building construction whatsoever

- The MG42 has a much wider arch than a Maxim and pins instantly in almost every situation

- The MG42 in fact is considered the best MG in the game when all it's stats and abilities are taken into account

- despite being the best MG in the game it's also among the cheapest (only Maxim is cheaper) and is only 1 of 2 that is available immediately


Of course lets ignore 4 men vs 6 men.

Ib4 "but teh deathloop," deathloop is only an issue when the maxim is facing alot of DPS, which isnt an issue when there are 4 other maxims.
18 Sep 2019, 17:24 PM
#33
avatar of Mr Carmine

Posts: 1289

The fear of spamming maxims is just unfounded.

Its mobility has been nerfed hard with removal of sprint. Its deploy time has been nerfed. Its supression has been nerfed. Its price has been nerfed. build time nerfed.

And the deathloop remains and is conciderd unfixable. Wich completely counteract "its more durable then all other mg,s"

To try to make it not suck. Its pick up time has been tweaked. Its supression has ben increased marginaly.
Its from what i saw in the other past about 50% of the mg42/34. In my experience using the maxim that seem to be accurate.

So how the hell would the op maxim return if we only increase its supression, while all the other factors that made it op remain gutted?
18 Sep 2019, 17:37 PM
#34
avatar of gbem

Posts: 1979

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Sep 2019, 14:09 PMFarlion
You can tell which players in this thread are good and which aren't.

Ignoring that the Maxim can pack up and deploy instantly, thus reacting to flanks much better than the MG42, is definitely the sign of being bad, or just incredibly biased.


The maxim has 1 second shorter reposition time in exchange for a double the arc and double the suppression... ignoring those two is just bias

Then again you have an axis dp... i wouldnt be in doubt of your bias



Of course lets ignore 4 men vs 6 men.

Ib4 "but teh deathloop," deathloop is only an issue when the maxim is facing alot of DPS, which isnt an issue when there are 4 other maxims.


Can people stop it with the retarded 6 man meme argument?
The deathloop is an issue when facing two things... aoe and dps... both are very common things in the battlefield so maxims are decrewed with relative ease

In fact this argument fails soo retardedly hard when you consider that a grenadier or oberblob has the option to FRONTALLY CHARGE THE MAXIM... no other mg suffers from that quirk... most especially axis mgs
18 Sep 2019, 17:38 PM
#35
avatar of Mr Carmine

Posts: 1289



Of course lets ignore 4 men vs 6 men.

Ib4 "but teh deathloop," deathloop is only an issue when the maxim is facing alot of DPS, which isnt an issue when there are 4 other maxims.


The deathloop is an issue when naded next to lots of dps. Its the only mg that gets naded frontaly so often.
I had 2 g43 fussies vet3 nicely next to eachother frontaly deathlooping it and wiping it. The maxim was setup when they entered vision and it started firing. Only one got supressed the other just killed the gunner, i tried to retreat it and gone was my maxim. No nades needed.

Only in fantasy land does this happen to other mg,s in simaler situations. Because they can supress effectively.

And when do you see 4 other maxims? You must live in the past.

The fact that you need more then one just do its jobs is a clear indicator it is very up mg.
18 Sep 2019, 17:59 PM
#36
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279



Of course lets ignore 4 men vs 6 men.

Ib4 "but teh deathloop," deathloop is only an issue when the maxim is facing alot of DPS, which isnt an issue when there are 4 other maxims.

Then make it expensive enough that you can't have 4.

The 6 man thing is a Soviet trait. Look at it this way:make the MG good enough that given the chance you would recrew it, even when not Soviet and then price it accordingly so it's not viable to spam them.
One could also increase the set up time so that it's not viable to attack move a bunch around. There's ways to have it useful and not rewarding to use as a Frontline unit but Noone is able to discuss anything about it without "maxim spam! 6 man squad!" and not even care that it costs 160mp just to unlock it.
18 Sep 2019, 19:01 PM
#37
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1


Ib4 "but teh deathloop," deathloop is only an issue when the maxim is facing alot of DPS, which isnt an issue when there are 4 other maxims.


Or literally any area of effect weapon..... You know, such as their dedicated counters (mortars)....

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Sep 2019, 16:16 PMFarlion

False on all counts. It is significantly faster than the MG42.


This is 100% a lie. Their setup times are exactly the same. Only the pack up time is faster, you are completely wrong. Ironic as hell for you to be accusing anyone of bias in this thread. You are either misinformed or a complete liar

Here's the note in the changelog. From 2 years ago:

Maxim HMG
Arc of fire increased from 60 degrees to 90 degrees (other MGs have 90-120 degrees)
* Setup time from 2 to 3 (other MGs have 3)
* Burst duration from 2.25 to 4.5
* Damage reduced from 4 to 3 (the DPS of the Maxim remains the same)
* Tracking speed from 35 to 28
* Reinforcement cost from 15 to 20
* Sprint removed from Vet1
* Sustained fire ability added at Vet1

Have you even played 1 game as the soviets in the last 2 years? How you could possibly miss this change...
18 Sep 2019, 19:38 PM
#38
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Willy Pete: Pershing is the Tiger Ace 2.0. Relic loves their OP dlc tanks
Today, 02:08 AM
Lady Xenarra: Hee's hoping that Pershing gets nerfs in 2.05.....
Yesterday, 17:55 PM
Rosbone: you know, you give the mods something to do so they can feel useful and you dont even get a thank you :guyokay:
Last Thursday, 23:06 PM
Willy Pete: :banned:
Last Thursday, 20:37 PM
Reverb: o_O
Last Thursday, 12:38 PM
aerafield: @LimaOscarMike I would say nowadays is a decent time to try CoH3. If you loved CoH2 however, there is a solid chance you're gonna dislike CoH3
Last Monday, 17:04 PM
LimaOscarMike: My laptop can't even run COH3. Should I get them on my Series X or is it dead yet?
19 Apr 2025, 05:10 AM
Rosbone: One of my last major gripes about Coh3. Price is still too high I feel for growth. But progress is always good.
19 Apr 2025, 04:43 AM
Rosbone: I am not 100% sure but I think Relic actually fixed up the skirmish menus a little last patch. If so, thank you and keep it coming.
19 Apr 2025, 04:39 AM
Osinyagov: Suddenly, coh2 is slowly dying, but you can play it, playerbase still big enough
09 Apr 2025, 17:00 PM
Osinyagov: Wow, i remember you from zansi and vali videos, good old memories
09 Apr 2025, 16:58 PM
Beinhard: o7 miss this game and zansi
09 Apr 2025, 14:09 PM
Lady Xenarra: @Willy Pete The lack of April Fools this year is odd lol
02 Apr 2025, 01:34 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus :*(
02 Apr 2025, 00:16 AM
dasheepeh: it was an honor guys :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:34 PM
aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st" :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:29 PM
Rosbone: @dasheepeh I guess that means this site is officially dead :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:19 PM
dasheepeh: no comic sans font for april 1st this year?
01 Apr 2025, 19:56 PM
Willy Pete: @Lady Xenarra this you? https://i.imgflip.com/3e4thi.jpg
01 Apr 2025, 02:53 AM
Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
01 Apr 2025, 02:36 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy :clap:
27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM
Soheil: Coh2 still broken server ?
25 Mar 2025, 18:27 PM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. :snfQuinn:.
24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM
Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
Willy Pete: @Nickbn you didn't ask a question, and this is a chat box...
20 Mar 2025, 13:11 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone it's incredibly rude to speak on someone elses behalf, especially when a question is directly adressed to them. I understand your passion for the subject at hand but I want to hear from him.
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
Rosbone: @Nickbn No, I am just saying people should not be using any Relic owned forum since they have proven they ban anyone who says true things about Coh3.
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone do you speak on his behalf? I didn't know. In that case keep us updated please.
18 Mar 2025, 16:47 PM
Rosbone: #RelicModdedEchoChamber
16 Mar 2025, 17:54 PM
Rosbone: @Nickbn True except, the only people on the Relic Discord/Reddit/Steam are brain washed monkey zealots. They wont even understand what @adamírcz is talking about. Anyone else is banned.
16 Mar 2025, 17:54 PM
Nickbn: @adamírcz might be a better idea to voice this to relic directly than to voice it here, in a shoutbox of a nearly deade fansite #justsaying...
16 Mar 2025, 16:36 PM
webdesign-muenchen-w: @Rosbone it is sick
14 Mar 2025, 22:09 PM
aerafield: @adamírcz aren't the first two disconnects free every day?
14 Mar 2025, 19:26 PM
Rosbone: It is so unlike Relic to punish its fans and community.
14 Mar 2025, 12:07 PM
adamírcz: So, I just got a leaver penalty without even getting onto the loading screen because of the game disconnecting, bravo Relic
14 Mar 2025, 10:45 AM
Rosbone: It is an indicator of the very short sighted capitalist view that plagues any company where leadership does not understand the product.
13 Mar 2025, 20:00 PM
Rosbone: They dont care about Coh3 or Coh in general. They are just trying to grab cash by ripping off the small user base they have.
13 Mar 2025, 19:58 PM
Rosbone: Just making mistake after mistake after mistake.
13 Mar 2025, 19:57 PM
Rosbone: It is clear they crapped out an unfinished game. And are now barely supporting it as they make new smaller games. Coh3 is stillborn. It will be meh for at least another 2-4 years. Meaning they killed the whole franchise instead of growing it.
13 Mar 2025, 19:56 PM
Rosbone: For a thing they could fix in minutes. Literally minutes.
13 Mar 2025, 19:53 PM
Rosbone: If I did play coh3 and was mainly a skirmish player, I would be pissed and probably stop playing. And it has been like this since release. Why? I would not tell my friends to buy a game I am not even playing. Lost sales and angered users.
13 Mar 2025, 19:53 PM
Rosbone: I am just saddened how Relic keeps hurting themselves by not fixing 5 minute things like menus. Why anger users with stuff that could be fixed in minutes???
13 Mar 2025, 19:50 PM
Rosbone: I was wondering why people think I was raging. I think it was when I said "because coh3 sucks so bad". That was not my opinion. Just a general feel from top players/streamers. I dont play Coh3 and have NO opinion of it.
13 Mar 2025, 19:48 PM
OKSpitfire: You can rage as often as you like btw, you usually manage to make it pretty funny.
12 Mar 2025, 11:18 AM
Rosbone: So it was a systemic failure across multiple disciplines and check points.
12 Mar 2025, 04:30 AM
Rosbone: Knowing how companies work, I imagine a new hire making the menus. The API they are using is complicated and things were hard to figure out. But at some point QA or management should have addressed these things. Usually within 6 months of starting.
12 Mar 2025, 04:29 AM
Rosbone: @theekvn I dont hate Coh3 or Relic. I just dont understand how you work on Coh3 for like 7 years and the menu system is worse than if a Programming 101 student made it. Feel free to explain it to me.
12 Mar 2025, 04:07 AM
theekvn: + 33% dmg rear hit was best deal ever.
12 Mar 2025, 04:00 AM
theekvn: KT just need fuel debuf from 15% to 50%, Ele arc of fire- aim time improve and they are good to go
12 Mar 2025, 03:59 AM
theekvn: and please Rosbone,I know you hate Coh3 to the bone due to your drama with relic, Still, Can you give a proper point of view instead of raging ?.
12 Mar 2025, 03:54 AM
theekvn: you rather go 76 to unity Whizbang 2.0 or go home.
12 Mar 2025, 03:52 AM
theekvn: also US tier 4 is 145f and Sherman pen 140 nerf is too much.
12 Mar 2025, 03:52 AM
theekvn: Whizbang lock behind CP, meanwhile stuka is techtree progress
12 Mar 2025, 03:51 AM
KoRneY: @aerafield It's possible that it is underpriced for what it is capable of now, no need to go full retard and take it immediately as a massive problem. It costs 60 more MP than a pz.3 and in 2v2 the barrage can be quite strong.
07 Mar 2025, 19:14 PM

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

370 users are online: 370 guests
1 post in the last 24h
12 posts in the last week
40 posts in the last month
Registered members: 54026
Welcome our newest member, Dunnegan
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM