Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
the fact thats it's one of the least seen doctrines in the entire game speaks louder than theorycrafting
Posts: 2358
It's power just requires some actual micro to pull off, but oh boy does it have some kick. Killing heavy TDs with the bombs is wicked satisfying
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
In real games, only in an already won 4v4 fuckfest and against a plant level of reaction player you can succesfully pull a Conscript AT assault vs heavy TDs... its literally punching the dead horse.
Posts: 593
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
can we stay on topic about 152 being swapped for b4 please. and stop the anger
Posts: 1527
Permanently Banned Posts: 1954
I used this doctrine extensively in the past and I moved on. I think the lack of tank kills it. I’d suggest:
0CP T34/85 (built at T4)
2CP Conscript tank hunter package (100 muni: 4 ptrs39s, camo, can plant light AT mines, grenade assault)
4CP TMDB heavy mines (70 muni: immobilises vehicle)
4CP Camouflage (AT guns and tanks can camouflage but must remain immobile)
9CP Mark Target
Posts: 21
Whoever wants more b4 is a 4v4 noob because the b4 is usually for trolls. And only in large games are there enough reliably stationary targets to delete with a b4. And for all who are attacking SkysTheLimit about being "axis-only," he's actually just slightly allied biased so if you can't agree with him, well..... seems you should stop playing 4v4 and start playing 1v1,2v2 and TRYING TO GET GOOD because you can easily do more damage with an ML20 than with a B4. But even as someone who likes to play Ost, I don't mind if you guys get a B4 instead, because 1) I don't play 4v4, 2) I'm not a noob so automatch won't rank me with low level B4 trolls that post their trolling on Youtube.
Posts: 17
Bro I'm gonna tell BaoLiang you said that >;[
Posts: 17
Posts: 1954
Congratulations, you just proved you used tank hunter commander vs easy CPU.
In real games, only in an already won 4v4 fuckfest and against a plant level of reaction player you can succesfully pull a Conscript AT assault vs heavy TDs... its literally punching the dead horse.
Of course tank hunter packs quite a punch, but it is so predictable...
B4 adds some 'excitement' RNG + a direct fire revamp
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
...
Lastly, I tested Cons with PTRS's versus standard Volks. They lose really badly where the normal Cons don't lose too badly. It'd be helpful to normalize the damage so that they aren't worse than standard Cons.
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
Lastly, I tested Cons with PTRS's versus standard Volks. They lose really badly where the normal Cons don't lose too badly. It'd be helpful to normalize the damage so that they aren't worse than standard Cons.
 |
|
|
98 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
170 | ||
 |
|
|
24 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
