Profile of pencilp5

Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2020, 12:24 PMJulianSnow

Heh, yea but those guys seem rather blind (atleast when I use them).

camo on the JP4 should be a doctrinal thingy aswell, if you were looking for my opinion on that.

Could fuse it with the Flares from Spec Ops. It would fit the doctrine and the doctrine could use something extra since the Command Panther got its nerf.



~Edit, doesn't the SU76 get camo if you pick tank-hunter tactics?

~Edit(2), while at it if the camo gets removed from the JP4 we could fill that vet-slot with 10-15% accuracy, then maybe they'll hit something ;P

Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2019, 13:17 PMoootto92

I would argue that rather than buffing the armour, making the brummbär more resistant to all AT, they should increase the barrage range. It is absurd that this vehicle can not fulfil the supposed role of attacking stationary positions as its vet ability has the same range as AT gun. Increasing the range of barrage by 5 and 5 more at vet 3 would up to total + 10range. This would act as a pseudobuff to the durability. This would be more balanced way to make stupa perform better in its supposed role without becoming more resistant to the allied TDs which should hardcounter this designated AI vehicle.

EDIT: I'm also here to protest grave injustice: Hull down does not increase the range of the barrage.