Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
It is axis bias to not want one of the most expensive tanks in the game actually be worth its price? Your argument is more like allied bias where just because one historian said the King Tiger was shit it has to be shit in the game too. All im asking for to be worth its investment in the game which it is currently not. Its more a meme than a tank atm.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
It is axis bias to not want one of the most expensive tanks in the game actually be worth its price? Your argument is more like allied bias where just because one historian said the King Tiger was shit it has to be shit in the game too. All im asking for to be worth its investment in the game which it is currently not. Its more a meme than a tank atm.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 4474
Katitof-2018
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
leaving aside all the hisrotical accuracy
should the KT have the same AI as a single p4 ?
when u could buy 2 p4 for the price and have much better AI ?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 4474
does the IS-2 have the same AI as a t 34 ? or even a p4 ?
Yes, it should.
Because you're having more then twice the durability due to armor and AT that allows you to bitchslap heavy tanks without much of a fuss and are taxed only half the micro needed as you're controlling 1 instead of 2 vehicles.
If you need AI vehicle, don't pick KT.
Unless you're trying to say that IS-2 needs its AI to be improved by additional 150%(its price compared to T34 price) and so on. You get the idea?
Katitof-2018
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
does the IS-2 have the same AI as a t 34 ? or even a p4 ?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 4474
then fix the damn max distance scatter and offset, it misses a lot unlike the tiger
Pre patch it was incomparably worse. Every 100 shots you had a money shot wipe, but remaining 99 shots couldn't hit broad side of the barn.
Post patch its as reliable as KT.
Katitof-2018
Posts: 5279
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Pre patch it was incomparably worse. Every 100 shots you had a money shot wipe, but remaining 99 shots couldn't hit broad side of the barn.
Post patch its as reliable as KT.
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
He didn't. There was still weapon stats he left out
Posts: 4474
i might be wrong but does max distance scatter affect hoe much u miss ?
Which ones would you like?
Katitof-2018
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
i might be wrong but does max distance scatter affect hoe much u miss ?
Posts: 589
Posts: 1217
I would say tactics and equipment. Of course those are points looked at in a vacuum.
Leave aside manpower, industry and logistical, which is three of the most important factors in the war, i highly curious what is left for the german to be "superior" ?
 |
|
|
28 | ||
|
|
|
|
16 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
