Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Why not replace the mortar with Assault Engineers for USF to better combat against CQC units early game.
It would be a fix I would say to some of its early game problems.
None really uses a mortar early do they, unless its team games but I think Assault Engineers would have a better impact.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 783
Because CQC units aren't a problem for them, countering HMGs without investing fuel is.
ukf
usf
okw
soviets
ostheer. Do not judge me, for my opinion is balanced. 
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
That is true.
Then they should just add the unit without the need of replacing a unit.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 783
There is no reason for that, because last changes allowed for very early HMG, which happen to stop CQC troops very well.
RETs also can now reliably apply suppression too, again, countering CQC units well in early game.
ukfusfokwsovietsostheer. Do not judge me, for my opinion is balanced. Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Alright.
Do you know how much the Surpression ability costs at the moment?
From what I remember, it is 30 ammo and that is pretty costy.
Should be cheaper like 20 ammo, possibly 15 even.
What do you think it should cost like?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Posts: 556
I have no idea what is so hard for you to understand there.
There was no different squad, no different models, just REGULAR RIFLES starting at random vet. Same thing for mobile defense osttruppen, no special models, no different squad, just REGULAR UNIT starting with a star.
Its COMPLETELY DIFFERENT THING then what you are asking for.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 785
Why not replace the mortar with Assault Engineers for USF to better combat against CQC units early game.
It would be a fix I would say to some of its early game problems.
None really uses a mortar early do they, unless its team games but I think Assault Engineers would have a better impact.
Posts: 1484
 | Playercard of WingZero | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 785
Can we get new bulletins for RE? I was thinking veteran rate increase or rate of fire.
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
USF
Riflemen Flares
The cost of flares is being matched to those used by units such as Panzerfusiliers to incentivise its use.
- Cost from 40 to 35
M21 Mortar Half-Track
We are slightly toning back the nerf to Whie Phosphorous from the M21 to have more impact on units that remain within the smoke.
- White Phosphorous damage frequency from 0.6 to 0.5
M4 Sherman 105mm Dozer
To allow players to purchase this unit when they have teched up to Major, we are reducing the CP cost. Additional CP changes will take effect when the patch hits live.
- Now requires Major tech
- CP requirement from 10 to 7; will be reduced to 6 for live patch
M26 Pershing
We are toning back some of the Pershing's AOE which previously allowed it to destroy most infantry squads in two hits. In return, the cost of HVAP is being reduced to give the Pershing an edge against vehicles.
- Far AOE damage from 0.225 to 0.175
- Mid AOE from 0.4 to 0.375
- HVAP shot from 60 to 50
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Posts: 232
Posts: 1954
I think USF is going to be in a really good spot. My only complaint is that the pakhowie change was weird. no nerf to AoE instead it was scatter, and its durability is still poor AF vs stuka zu fuss because 6->5 man in previous patch.
That and I wish they had nondoc rocket arty. You simply cannot break heavy entrenched axis players with constant pak howie/scott. You actually need a priest and in 1v1 play that is almost a death sentence.
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
The M8A1 is still overperforming currently it is still a super long range brummbar thats cheaper and comes out sooner.. it's damage should be turned down to stug e levels.
Posts: 1794
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Lmao.
I don't think the Scott is on the same level of Lethality that a StuPa is.
Is sure is an annoying unit, that can *gasp* drop German models in a reliable way, the issue is that if you nerf it then USF stock rooster will lack sorely on maps that you simply can't use Shermans... Or in situations it's your closest alternative to lacking Rocket Artillery outside of Commanders.
Please consider that, it's a mobile mini-howitzer, it's not an assault gun.
You can't compare it to one or want it to turn into a subpar version of it, without considering how would that play out besides stuff like, I wish it stopped doing it's one job.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
...have enough HP, speed and armor ..., you cannot reliably kill it...
 |
|
|
146 | ||
 |
|
|
85 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
113 | ||
|
|
|
|
44 | ||
|
|
|
|
18 | ||
|
|
|
|
17 | ||
 |
|
|
10 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
