Elephant/Jagdtiger
Doctrinal solution to a non-doctrinal problem.
Posts: 4928
Elephant/Jagdtiger
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Doctrinal solution to a doctrinal problem.
Posts: 1096
The problem is not simply the performance of Churchill but the performance of allied armor/TD and infatry.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Armour, TD's and AND infantry are the problem now?
That's a very generalist statement XD
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Armour, TD's and AND infantry are the problem now?
That's a very generalist statement XD
Posts: 591 | Subs: 1
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
A combined army of well used units is a problem?It is when a combined army of well sued Ostheer units can not deal with less combined army of allied unit using less micro.
Shit son. Better nerf that. Remive everything but grens and conscripts, game fixed.
Posts: 591 | Subs: 1
It is when a combined army of well sued Ostheer units can not deal with less combined army of allied unit using less micro.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
That's an L2P issue, situated between keyboard and chair.
Be it build choices or micro or use of units, there's no Magic Brit Bullet for easy wins by picking Anvil.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
But this clearly not a player issue. Churchill is simply op currently.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
That's also an opinion, unless you're hiding some relic metrics on use and efficiency of a unit and if you do, share it for only that way it'll stop being opinion.
Until then, its just another opinion you're fully entitled to.
Posts: 1484
Posts: 4474
katitof what's ur opinion on the chirchuil ? do fell it's fair for it to have such an high rear armor ? with so much hp ?
That's also an opinion, unless you're hiding some relic metrics on use and efficiency of a unit and if you do, share it for only that way it'll stop being opinion.
Until then, its just another opinion you're fully entitled to.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
katitof what's ur opinion on the chirchuil ? do fell it's fair for it to have such an high rear armor ? with so much hp ?
Posts: 4474
that's fair but it has more armor than super heavy in the rear while having comparable frontal armor, and everytinh should have a counter, i think rear armor for vehicle should be the universal counter , i mean the whole point of COH2 is using the enemy weakness aganist them and catching them out of position(that's why we have arc ofr mg and team weapons and units needs to turn unlike say starcraft or age of empire)
Yes, because its very slow vehicle that arrives very late, has very weak gun for the price and timing, slows to extreme crawl when fausted/drives over a mine, can't chase any other vehicle in game and blocks apparently overpowered comet and super extremely useful and strong vehicle snare(according to certain indivudual here) while, with the repair nerf to heavy sappers in the past, stays a long time in repairs.
Its 240 frontal armor isn't something hard to penetrate, a pair of stugs and an ATG will wreck it fast.
Just don't use 2 next to each other, completely unsupported by any other unit paks, because it can kill them.
Its a late game damage sponge tank.
It means it needs to soak in damage.
If it was supposed to be frail from any side, it would be by now.
You're not supposed to kill everything by parking P4 at its back.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
snip.
katitof what's ur opinion on the chirchuil ? do fell it's fair for it to have such an high rear armor ? with so much hp ?
Posts: 3260
that's fair but it has more armor than super heavy in the rear while having comparable frontal armor, and everytinh should have a counter, i think rear armor for vehicle should be the universal counter , i mean the whole point of COH2 is using the enemy weakness aganist them and catching them out of position
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Posts: 2358
That's an L2P issue, situated between keyboard and chair.
Be it build choices or micro or use of units, there's no Magic Brit Bullet for easy wins by picking Anvil.
Posts: 2358
15 | |||||
4 | |||||
1 |