Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
The only things that wouldnt prove problematic in your eyes are 5 men conscript squad and 4 men maxim crew. Every single thing that is not absolute trash "would prove problematic". But only in USF feedback threads.
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
than not having a Jumbo with a visual 1mm of an armor slab added to it's hull and turret armor.
And I don't think 1mm of slab armor on the model is the same as a fixed superstructure but alright.
Posts: 1220
but yeah he is talking true evrything what is good for usf is problematic for you.
Can we simply skip the personal comments. Claiming that others are biased does not help the progress of a debate at all.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Ambulance?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 528 | Subs: 1
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2
It's over an inch of extra armor, not a millimetre, which makes the front hull noticeably bulkier. Then there's also the mantlet that should look completely different.
As far as ingame visual communication goes, if this was a professionally added asset, it would probably get some other very distinctive features on the model that it really needs to make it stand out, like sandbags on the front hull or having crew equipment all over it - just like how the 105mm Sherman comes with the dozer (even though IRL most of them weren't fitted with those) or the unique skin on the Tiger Ace.
Posts: 1389 | Subs: 1
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
but yeah he is talking true evrything what is good for usf is problematic for you.
Its nothing "personal" but you are not right.
Firefly and churchill combo will be still better.
Pershing and jackson combo - i guess this one is damn op for you but this still will be better
Maybe just write here list not op usf units plx im curious
Ambulance?
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
It's literally a millimeter of armor on the model in-game if you zoom in at max, there is no possible way for someone to notice it in the middle of combat.
And the Tiger Ace skin you're referring to is only liked by 2 whole people on this entire site, I can probably even name them.
Posts: 464
Posts: 3260
The bulkier front armor is easily noticeable from a distance. Furthermore it doesn't matter if people like the Tiger Ace skin or not, the point is that it's used to make it stand out (visual communication) from a normal Tiger so people can instantly recognize it's a vehicle that has vastly different stats.
Posts: 528 | Subs: 1
i dont think US needs more armour pershing is already fine and E8 jumbo wont be even that special imo
Posts: 3260
This is like requesting the Jagdpanther to be in CoH2 and just proposing to use the Panther model with the turret stuck facing forwards because they kinda look the same from a distance.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I can't tell the difference between a short-barrelled 76mm Sherman and a Jumbo. What am I missing?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 3260
Glasses.
He explained to me that a custom skin was used to "cut" the barrel of the 76mm Sherman.
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2
I can't tell the difference between a short-barrelled 76mm Sherman and a Jumbo. What am I missing?
Posts: 3260
There is no short barreled 76mm Sherman or Sherman with a 75mm gun equipped 76 turret tank.
The 76's turret was used because of it's increased weight limit, that's why the Jumbo used it for the increased armor.
So unless you put your glass on and zoom out all the way in-game in the middle of battle you will not notice the lack of literally 1mm of the armor on the model and can't confuse it it with the 76 Sherman.
Whoever has at least a basic knowledge of WW2 and American Armor, which includes Sherman variants for the most part, will be fine with a shorter barreled 76 Sherman with a different icon and text.
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2
One millimetre? That's less than the width of these text characters.
I'm not sure the game can even render that.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
 | Playercard of T.R. Stormjäger | |||||||||||||||
|
 |
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
