Login

russian armor

Ostheer MG/Early

  • This thread is locked
PAGES (13)down
16 Feb 2019, 17:13 PM
#41
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

Don't see how anyone can argue that the mg42 should be 260mp while the .50 cal is 280 and the maxim is 260. The mg42 performance shouldn't be nerfed, but it's price is just nonsense.
16 Feb 2019, 18:16 PM
#42
avatar of distrofio

Posts: 2358

Don't see how anyone can argue that the mg42 should be 260mp while the .50 cal is 280 and the maxim is 260. The mg42 performance shouldn't be nerfed, but it's price is just nonsense.

Each factions unit cost is dependent of what the faction can achieve. Also each faction has powerspikes to keep clashes a back and forth fight. If you consider that OST has no CQC units until T2, Mg42 is the only way to stop rushing in units.
If you ignore, timestamps, relative faction escalation and resource allocation, oportunity costs and overall endgame, and compare plain simple stats vs cost, you wont understand why any unit of the game costs what it costs.
You dont compare blindly between factions end even less on units that are not meant to fight eachothers
16 Feb 2019, 18:58 PM
#43
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

Pios are actually a threat in the early stages of the game capable of threatening weapon crews. They arnt panzergrens but they arnt to be ignored either.

Again, the mg42 is fine. It does its job perfectly. It's the other mgs that are lacking.
The vickers seems to kill a model too fast resulting in having to reaim and loses Supression, this is bad because of the flame nade that will force retreat 100% of the time, 110% if they have stgs, similariliy the maxim is ineffective unless you have a pair, which is bad balance and same as the Vicky it can't suppress enough to stop the flame nade, followed by death loop.... M2 feels inconsistent, idky though sometimes it suppresses wicked fast, other times it doesn't.
16 Feb 2019, 19:37 PM
#44
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1


You dont compare blindly between factions end even less on units that are not meant to fight eachothers


No one is blindly comparing anything, and you don't need to be a CQC squad to force off an MG. If rear echelon flank an MG42 it needs to retreat...

What's being compared are units that have the same job. Suppress infantry before they advance any further. The one that is the best at this is cheaper than ones that aren't as good and have costs just to unlock them.

Yes of course armies are different. And? Tell me why it would not be okay for the mg42 to cost 280mp.
16 Feb 2019, 19:46 PM
#45
avatar of Alphrum

Posts: 808



No one is blindly comparing anything, and you don't need to be a CQC squad to force off an MG. If rear echelon flank an MG42 it needs to retreat...

What's being compared are units that have the same job. Suppress infantry before they advance any further. The one that is the best at this is cheaper than ones that aren't as good and have costs just to unlock them.

Yes of course armies are different. And? Tell me why it would not be okay for the mg42 to cost 280mp.


Because you have to also consider the timing of units
16 Feb 2019, 20:34 PM
#47
avatar of IncendiaryRounds:)

Posts: 1527

Permanently Banned
Wow a lot of people here fail to realize that the mg42 is best or on par with vickers is because grens are less than cost efficient. In fact it may be argued that grens are the worst mainline since cons don't face double upgraded inf. And the fact that they have penals at 1 min mark if they choose. Riflemen have twice the dps of grens at point blank, yet cost only 17% more. I know not every engagement is at point blank but riflemen easily beat grens at almost all ranges. Even at absolute max range, riflemen can beat grens half the time.

Hence mg42 is underpriced because grens are overpriced.
16 Feb 2019, 21:40 PM
#48
avatar of SeductiveCardbordBox

Posts: 591 | Subs: 1

Wow a lot of people here fail to realize that the mg42 is best or on par with vickers is because grens are less than cost efficient. In fact it may be argued that grens are the most mainline since cons don't face double upgraded inf. And the fact that they have penals at 1 min mark if they choose. Riflemen have twice the dps of grens at point blank, yet cost only 17% more. I know not every engagement is at point blank but riflemen easily beat grens at almost all ranges. Even at absolute max range, riflemen can beat grens half the time.

Hence mg42 is underpriced because grens are overpriced.


What on earth are you talking about. Grens are one of the most reliable mainline infantry units going.

And if you want to fix grens, sure, fix grens (they don't need it). But don't use one unit as a justification for another being underpriced. That's just terrible design all around.

Hell. By your logic the Maxim should be AMAZING because conscripts are trash. Better than the Mg42, even.
16 Feb 2019, 21:47 PM
#49
avatar of IncendiaryRounds:)

Posts: 1527

Permanently Banned


What on earth are you talking about. Grens are one of the most reliable mainline infantry units going.

And if you want to fix grens, sure, fix grens (they don't need it). But don't use one unit as a justification for another being underpriced. That's just terrible design all around.

Hell. By your logic the Maxim should be AMAZING because conscripts are trash. Better than the Mg42, even.


U didn't read my damn post. Cons don't face double upgraded inf. They have the least firepower in a vacuum. But coh2 isn't played in a vacuum. The chance of anybody tampering with mainlines either to buff or nerf them is extremely unlikely, so I doubt grens will be buffed. Hence the mg42 shouldn't be touched in its current form. Grens are the most reliable mainlines? Then wtf are volks? 5man squad for 10mp more, after vet 1, it gets better RA than grens making it COMPLETELY superior to grens. 0.9 RA squad vs 0.91 4man squad.
16 Feb 2019, 23:31 PM
#50
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8



U didn't read my damn post. Cons don't face double upgraded inf. They have the least firepower in a vacuum. But coh2 isn't played in a vacuum. The chance of anybody tampering with mainlines either to buff or nerf them is extremely unlikely, so I doubt grens will be buffed. Hence the mg42 shouldn't be touched in its current form. Grens are the most reliable mainlines? Then wtf are volks? 5man squad for 10mp more, after vet 1, it gets better RA than grens making it COMPLETELY superior to grens. 0.9 RA squad vs 0.91 4man squad.


Volks don't get better RA then grens.
Grens have 0.91 RA out of the gate as well.
Later vet RA also favors grens.
Most of DPS focused on 1 model which focuses on opposing models is superior then 2 lower dps weapons focusing on different targets, because you will not be dropping models as reliably and opponent will have higher chance to lose just health instead of models, so no, dual weapons aren't really superior in the way you think you are.

Also, factions able to do it, you remember how you REEEEEE'd about ost being muni heavy faction?
Well guess what, these factions you complain about are even more muni heavy.

And while there is nothing wrong with hmg42, there is also nothing wrong with grens and their performance against much more expensive squads who have invested twice the ammo on their upgrades AND more menpower AND some fuel as well, so unless you are just a-move gren spamming blobber(which you are, lets be honest here), any issues with grens vs other infantries come from L2P.

Do you want a link to strategy section so proper people can help you on your build orders and micro?
17 Feb 2019, 00:58 AM
#51
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post16 Feb 2019, 19:46 PMAlphrum


Because you have to also consider the timing of units


Mg42 can hit the field faster than 3/4 of the other stock mgs. So again, what's wrong with having it cost 280 mp? I don't see how that can't be worth buying
17 Feb 2019, 03:41 AM
#52
avatar of IncendiaryRounds:)

Posts: 1527

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post16 Feb 2019, 23:31 PMKatitof


Volks don't get better RA then grens.
Grens have 0.91 RA out of the gate as well.
Later vet RA also favors grens.
Most of DPS focused on 1 model which focuses on opposing models is superior then 2 lower dps weapons focusing on different targets, because you will not be dropping models as reliably and opponent will have higher chance to lose just health instead of models, so no, dual weapons aren't really superior in the way you think you are.

Also, factions able to do it, you remember how you REEEEEE'd about ost being muni heavy faction?
Well guess what, these factions you complain about are even more muni heavy.

And while there is nothing wrong with hmg42, there is also nothing wrong with grens and their performance against much more expensive squads who have invested twice the ammo on their upgrades AND more menpower AND some fuel as well, so unless you are just a-move gren spamming blobber(which you are, lets be honest here), any issues with grens vs other infantries come from L2P.

Do you want a link to strategy section so proper people can help you on your build orders and micro?


Um, I doubt you've even seen a single one of my games. I'm probably one of the ost players that absolutely hate using grens. I either get Ostruppen or a pure mg pio build. I'm the last player that would a-move a gren blob. You obviously don't know a damn thing about me.

Ost is more muni heavy than SU and OKW. Grens need their upgrade the most since without them, they are on par with (what u like to call) "trash tier" cons. Stg volks and bar riflemen are simply to further enhance their dps. Lmg grens are usually bought so they don't fall too far behind enemy mainlines. Also, Ost has no bulletproof lights and relies on mines the most to stop light vehicles. Like u said, grens have better RA than volks only after the grens hit vet 3. Otherwise if both are around vet 1, volks completely overshadow grens. The best in class dps of the lmg42 has its drawbacks. No shooting on the move, poor dps in close range unlike the volk stgs which get better dps the closer they are which is far better for defending themselves against charging rifles/penals.

I didn't complain about the gren or the mg42. I said both of their current performance is easily justified. Nor do I REEEEEEE about everything. It seems anybody who you disagree with is on your REEEEEE list.
17 Feb 2019, 04:13 AM
#53
avatar of distrofio

Posts: 2358

...
What's being compared are units that have the same job. Suppress infantry before they advance any further. The one that is the best at this is cheaper than ones that aren't as good and have costs just to unlock them.

Yes of course armies are different. And? Tell me why it would not be okay for the mg42 to cost 280mp.

Since gren do not cost the same as cons, neither riflemen nor inf squads. Since game balance is about assimetry and also by far because MG42 are the iconic unit of OST.
Why would cons cost 200? Why dont they cost the same as a gren squad or volks squad, because they are the iconic squad of SU. Im not even mentioning penals.
Its actual cost is great, it is performing fine, better than any other Mg, as it should, since its design is for it to be the BEST mg available. Vickers are snipers mg and everyone is fine with that.

If you really want good suppression for SU,USF,UKF then steal an mg42, its not that hard for any allied faction.
17 Feb 2019, 04:59 AM
#54
avatar of LoopDloop

Posts: 3053


Each factions unit cost is dependent of what the faction can achieve. Also each faction has powerspikes to keep clashes a back and forth fight. If you consider that OST has no CQC units until T2, Mg42 is the only way to stop rushing in units.
If you ignore, timestamps, relative faction escalation and resource allocation, oportunity costs and overall endgame, and compare plain simple stats vs cost, you wont understand why any unit of the game costs what it costs.
You dont compare blindly between factions end even less on units that are not meant to fight eachothers

Meanwhile brits are off crying in a corner with no indirect counters and no nondoc assault/cqc infantry but ok.

I seriously think mg42 is fine though.
17 Feb 2019, 10:43 AM
#55
avatar of SeductiveCardbordBox

Posts: 591 | Subs: 1

U didn't read my damn post. Cons don't face double upgraded inf. They have the least firepower in a vacuum...


jump backJump back to quoted post16 Feb 2019, 23:31 PMKatitof
Volks don't get better RA then grens.
Grens have 0.91 RA out of the gate as well.
Later vet RA also favors grens.
Most of DPS focused on 1 model which focuses on opposing models is superior then 2 lower dps weapons focusing on different targets, because you will not be dropping models as reliably and opponent will have higher chance to lose just health instead of models, so no, dual weapons aren't really superior in the way you think you are...


To add on a little more context - the days of grens having to face 'double upgraded' squads are a thing of the past, in terms of imbalance.

BARs and Brens have both been nerfed and it is no longer possible to equip a squad with double M1919's.

On top of that, the squads cons face don't need to be threatened with 'double upgrades' because almost every combat squad in the game starts off condierably better at combat than them. Fusiliers, JLI, Obers, Grenadiers and Volks all get a single weapon upgrade (with 1-4 guns included in the package) that throws the balance of what they have to fight substantially more dramatically than a rifle squad with two BARs.

So yeah. You're picking and choosing totally arbitraty goalpoasts and comparisons.

Either the other HMGs need buffs or the MG42 should cost 280, beacse right now it is indisputably the best in the long run. Let us not mention the DshK.

To loop back to an earlier post, I'm in favour of the other Mgs getting some much needed love. See AP round tweaks, gimmick brit vet, maxim being bad.
17 Feb 2019, 14:20 PM
#56
avatar of IncendiaryRounds:)

Posts: 1527

Permanently Banned




To add on a little more context - the days of grens having to face 'double upgraded' squads are a thing of the past, in terms of imbalance.

BARs and Brens have both been nerfed and it is no longer possible to equip a squad with double M1919's.

On top of that, the squads cons face don't need to be threatened with 'double upgrades' because almost every combat squad in the game starts off condierably better at combat than them. Fusiliers, JLI, Obers, Grenadiers and Volks all get a single weapon upgrade (with 1-4 guns included in the package) that throws the balance of what they have to fight substantially more dramatically than a rifle squad with two BARs.

So yeah. You're picking and choosing totally arbitraty goalpoasts and comparisons.

Either the other HMGs need buffs or the MG42 should cost 280, beacse right now it is indisputably the best in the long run. Let us not mention the DshK.

To loop back to an earlier post, I'm in favour of the other Mgs getting some much needed love. See AP round tweaks, gimmick brit vet, maxim being bad.


Comparing doctrinal and elite infantry with cons. LOL. And how are volks and grens considerably better at start? Volks are only slightly better and grens are the same. And riflemen with 2 bars will beat any of the squad you've mentioned with their respective weapon upgrades (the only squad to beat double bar riflemen is lmg obers at absolute max range with similar vet), meaning what cons need to deal with is less terrifying than double bar riflemen.
17 Feb 2019, 15:09 PM
#57
avatar of SeductiveCardbordBox

Posts: 591 | Subs: 1

Comparing doctrinal and elite infantry with cons. LOL. And how are volks and grens considerably better at start? Volks are only slightly better and grens are the same. And riflemen with 2 bars will beat any of the squad you've mentioned with their respective weapon upgrades (the only squad to beat double bar riflemen is lmg obers at absolute max range with similar vet), meaning what cons need to deal with is less terrifying than double bar riflemen.


That's not just bias any more, you're just legitimately wrong.

Double bar riflemen are not some sort of all powerful gods. Learn your actual unit values.
17 Feb 2019, 17:12 PM
#58
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1


If you really want good suppression for SU,USF,UKF then steal an mg42, its not that hard for any allied faction.


Harder than stealing literally any of the allied mgs. Even the 6 man maxim. MGs should not really differ THIS much. And I'm asking for a 20mp increase

The Vickers for example, you say it's okay for it to be the sniper MG. That's pretty dumb in my book because the more models you kill the harder it is to suppress the squad. Like that could not make less sense.
17 Feb 2019, 18:33 PM
#59
avatar of Outsider_Sidaroth

Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1

Gotta love how his argument keeps going back to "Double BAR Riflemen!".
17 Feb 2019, 18:40 PM
#60
avatar of Serrith

Posts: 783


Since gren do not cost the same as cons, neither riflemen nor inf squads. Since game balance is about assimetry and also by far because MG42 are the iconic unit of OST.
Why would cons cost 200? Why dont they cost the same as a gren squad or volks squad, because they are the iconic squad of SU. Im not even mentioning penals.
Its actual cost is great, it is performing fine, better than any other Mg, as it should, since its design is for it to be the BEST mg available. Vickers are snipers mg and everyone is fine with that.

If you really want good suppression for SU,USF,UKF then steal an mg42, its not that hard for any allied faction.


FYI, cons cost 240mp. Not sure where you got 200mp from.



That's not just bias any more, you're just legitimately wrong.

Double bar riflemen are not some sort of all powerful gods. Learn your actual unit values.


Double bar rifles do outperform the mentioned units even with upgrades just as he said. -again with exception of lmg obers at long range only.
PAGES (13)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Rosbone: However, since Relic added kill counts I cannot trash Coh3 anymore. And have subsequentially started to sprout breasts. I am slowly transitioning into a Coh3 enjoyer :blush:
Yesterday, 13:43 PM
Rosbone: Its good to see people coming back even if it is to trash Coh3 and shit talk each other. That is what men do. :snfQuinn:
Yesterday, 13:41 PM
Rosbone: @skemshead How do you know they are idiots? I mean. I know. But how do YOU know? :snfPeter:
Yesterday, 13:40 PM
PatFenis: Hilarious how late people jump on the hate wagon. bro the train left the station 2 years ago. Fuck off and let this site die in peace.
Yesterday, 10:20 AM
OKSpitfire: @aerafield :lolol:
Yesterday, 09:13 AM
skemshead: Lol, you two idiots think i am referring to brown people and the female lead in the single campaign. Nothing to do with game being utter shit.
Yesterday, 07:36 AM
skemshead: Coh3 target audience appears to be younger generation, console users and maybe asian nationalities ( hence the child like cartoon animation and colour scheme )
Yesterday, 07:34 AM
aerafield: "all these bright colours and the woman in the campaign put my straight sexuality and conservative views in danger!"
Yesterday, 03:08 AM
donofsandiego: "wehhh wehhhh, there are brown people and women in my WW2 video game, the woke mafia strikes again!!" :loco:
Yesterday, 00:58 AM
berkeley: hi, how can i dump files with essence editor ? I want to dump images similar to this repo https://github.com/aoe4world
Last Sunday, 22:47 PM
skemshead: @Rosbone Because its fucking shit. It is blatantly obvious that they changed their target audience and its not fucking mature white dudes.
Last Sunday, 21:36 PM
Rosbone: Going full guano on 'em. :luvCarrot:
Last Sunday, 12:13 PM
Rosbone: @skemshead "You cut me bro. You cut me deep." - Relic
Last Sunday, 12:11 PM
skemshead: Coh3 is boring as batshit, no soul.
Last Sunday, 10:36 AM
skemshead: Coh3 is also absolutely terrible from a spectator perspective.
Last Sunday, 10:35 AM
skemshead: There is zero chance relic can turn coh3 around the way they did with coh2.
Last Sunday, 10:32 AM
Rosbone: Hopefully we can look back and laugh in a couple years. But the Steam reviews are diving again so... :guyokay:
Last Thursday, 08:03 AM
Rosbone: @donofsandiego The counts are up a little. Coh3 actually passes Coh2 for a short period now. So Coh3 is no longer shit. It has a way to go to be "good". But it is healing. :gimpy:
Last Thursday, 08:01 AM
donofsandiego: :foreveralone::gimpy::mcsteve:
Last Thursday, 06:28 AM
donofsandiego: Last time I was on here my good friend Rosbone told me that CoH 3 is shit because it doesn't have visible kill counts. Well, it has them now. Where are the players?
Last Thursday, 06:27 AM

Livestreams

unknown 4
Germany 2
Australia 1

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

507 users are online: 507 guests
1 post in the last 24h
10 posts in the last week
29 posts in the last month
Registered members: 50059
Welcome our newest member, LasVegasRVRepair
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM