Every Faction has tools to deal with every situation.
If you play better, you win 95% of time.
What is your Problem with Balance??
9 Oct 2018, 12:26 PM
#1
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
9 Oct 2018, 12:36 PM
#2
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Is this why UKF is getting vehicle snares after being crippled by removing all the gimmicks they have relied on to compensate lack of tools?
Lack of non docrinal, cheap, mobile mortar also hurts them.
Lack of non docrinal, cheap, mobile mortar also hurts them.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
9 Oct 2018, 12:58 PM
#3
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
Your playercard victory ratio says otherwise.
9 Oct 2018, 13:15 PM
#4
Posts: 713 | Subs: 2
agreed
9 Oct 2018, 13:45 PM
#5
Posts: 44
Good joke (no). 
9 Oct 2018, 13:46 PM
#6
Posts: 712
Opinions from people that have anime profile pictures dont count
9 Oct 2018, 14:07 PM
#7
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
If you play well, you win 95% of time.
No, it's 50%. Either you win or you lose. Trust me, 60% of the time, it works everytime.
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
9 Oct 2018, 17:11 PM
#8
Posts: 879
With no errors, that's more or less true now.
Some factions are more forgiving of errors than others. Some factions you can lose most of your infantry and still win the game, and some have 4-man squads that are essentially useless once they lose two models. Some factions you have to make sure you never get into a bad situation in the first place, with others you can retreat out of one with no risk of wipes.
Some factions are more forgiving of errors than others. Some factions you can lose most of your infantry and still win the game, and some have 4-man squads that are essentially useless once they lose two models. Some factions you have to make sure you never get into a bad situation in the first place, with others you can retreat out of one with no risk of wipes.
9 Oct 2018, 18:09 PM
#9
1 
Posts: 2885
Your playercard victory ratio says otherwise.
Did he say he plays well though?
@OP Yes of course. And that is for a long time now. Pretty much ever since brits have been a little tamed after initial madness. If relic was still supporting the game as much as they did before, it would be the right time to drop another expansion to mess things up for the third time.
The reason why most of the players will never acknowledge this is that the grass is always greener on the other side.
10 Oct 2018, 00:00 AM
#10
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
I dont understand this thread or what OP intends.
10 Oct 2018, 06:45 AM
#11
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
I dont understand this thread or what OP intends.
I'm speaking of the constant whining ind crying in the balance forum, while the truth is: if you play better, you win.
There are no greater balance problems anymore
10 Oct 2018, 07:50 AM
#12
Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1
If you won 95% of the time then you would have a higher win percentage then the best players on the leaderboards.
bg /l
10 Oct 2018, 09:03 AM
#13
Posts: 33
If you won 95% of the time then you would have a higher win percentage then the best players on the leaderboards.
He said if you play better than your opponent you have a 95% chance of winning, not that good players win 95% of their games.
Balance discussions are always a shitfest, especially in asymetrical RNG-influenced games like Coh. Just let the people vent and hope that the balance-team values statistics and numbers more than the tears of salty players.
10 Oct 2018, 09:32 AM
#14
Posts: 310
He said if you play better than your opponent you have a 95% chance of winning, not that good players win 95% of their games.
Balance discussions are always a shitfest, especially in asymetrical RNG-influenced games like Coh. Just let the people vent and hope that the balance-team values statistics and numbers more than the tears of salty players.
They become a shitfest when part of people start asking for hilarious buffs or nerfs on certain units.
"L is for L Shaped Ambush"
-Orion Training Group
-Orion Training Group
10 Oct 2018, 09:42 AM
#15
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
The main issue with balance thread is that some users turn balance issues to personal issues.
The focus should be the suggestion and not person making it.
The focus should be the suggestion and not person making it.
10 Oct 2018, 09:54 AM
#16
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
The main issue with balance thread is that some users turn balance issues to personal issues.
The focus should be the suggestion and not person making it.
I would argue the main issue with balance threads is, 99% of them are being made by people who are nowhere near skill level for balance to matter in any slightest way.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
10 Oct 2018, 10:29 AM
#17
Posts: 84
Did he say he plays well though?
@OP Yes of course. And that is for a long time now. Pretty much ever since brits have been a little tamed after initial madness. If relic was still supporting the game as much as they did before, it would be the right time to drop another expansion to mess things up for the third time.
The reason why most of the players will never acknowledge this is that the grass is always greener on the other side.
Totally Agreed on this post. I played both Ally and Axis, but mostly on USF and Werh, so i could understand what makes both side tick and countered ... or what gets run over
10 Oct 2018, 13:35 PM
#18
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
I would argue the main issue with balance threads is, 99% of them are being made by people who are nowhere near skill level for balance to matter in any slightest way.
The skill level is not related in anyway with the ability of one to make productive unbiased balance comment.
Trying to find criteria, which one has to fulfill before proving helpful balance comments is practically pointless because even if one could come up with such criteria, one would than have to enforce a way to separate people into categories.
It is actually much simpler and far more productive to focus on the comment themselves instead of focusing on the person who makes the comments.
The hostility and toxicity with which some people respond to posts, is indicator that they have personal issues and they are far less productive than the people who made the original post.
10 Oct 2018, 14:01 PM
#19
Posts: 543
Unrelated question, but is there any date for the new patch to launch? This one is going through tests for ages.
10 Oct 2018, 14:03 PM
#20
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
The skill level is not related in anyway with the ability of one to make productive unbiased balance comment.
Trying to find criteria, which one has to fulfill before proving helpful balance comments is practically pointless because even if one could come up with such criteria, one would than have to enforce a way to separate people into categories.
It is actually much simpler and far more productive to focus on the comment themselves instead of focusing on the person who makes the comments.
The hostility and toxicity with which some people respond to posts, is indicator that they have personal issues and they are far less productive than the people who made the original post.
I'm not talking about average players who understand stats and balance.
I'm talking about the very bad players who do not understand it, but will post about it anyway.
Having skill to use units to full extend helps tremendously and not having it, especially when sticking to just one faction/side means to very biased opening posts.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
45 | ||
 |
|
|
19 | ||
 |
|
|
47 | ||
|
|
|
|
27 | ||
 |
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.841223.790+4
- 3.35157.860+16
- 4.599234.719+7
- 5.934410.695-1
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
11
Download
1259
Board Info
753 users are online:
753 guests
0 post in the last 24h
12 posts in the last week
26 posts in the last month
12 posts in the last week
26 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49851
Welcome our newest member, Eovaldis
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Eovaldis
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM