3 
Posts: 545
Here, it shoot at mid range from 0:06 to 1:09 before being able to supress the squad.
@Miragefla same as mg42 ?
This is BS, and test both hmg in green cover to see more bs.
Posts: 2742
funny thing is once rifles and penals get to vet 3, mg34 doesn't even get a chance to suppress. Double bren IS Blobs wiping mg42/34 faster than it can even suppress still happens btw.
Either give it another suppression buff or more damage, currently it makes more sense to just build more volks to contest the map.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
I think this is a good point: RA affects suppression.
Furthermore as the game progresses yellow cover appears all over the map, which throttles accuracy by half.
This makes non-MG42s struggle to perform as MGs.
Posts: 2742
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Pretty sure that's not the case - Miragefla said that a HMG could have 0% accuracy and still suppress (it's a separate effect that's applied)...
It's more of a question "Does OKW need a HMG that deals good-ish DPS in addition to MG-42 levels of suppression?"
Posts: 1660
Lol do you mean PIN the squad? the squads SUPPRESSED in the first burst. Kinda pointless for you to be complaining on threads if your mixing up game mechanics right?
Posts: 1660
It's more of a question "Does OKW need a HMG that deals good-ish DPS in addition to MG-42 levels of suppression?"
Posts: 587
Being bad at the game isn't something balance patches can fix.
3 Posts: 545
Posts: 1002 | Subs: 2
USF seems perfectly fine with a HMG that has better dps, mg42 suppresion and enough penetration to wipe the floor with a 222/251 (hurts luchs with the vet 1 ability).
Any argument you make against a decent HMG for OKW is null and void when you look at the 50 call.
Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4
Permanently Banned
this!
And additional:
axis must deal with the mass infantery spam with better infantery than axis have...so OKW should get at leat something vs early mg spam...on so many maps you can easily make base lock vs OKW
Posts: 747 | Subs: 2
Well not knowing game mechanics names makes discussion kinda pointless. fyi, apart from DSHK no MG passes your test, if they increase the supression to make every MG pin in yellow cover scenario that means insta pin in any other scenario. logic.
 | Playercard of RedT3rror | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 2742
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
USF seems perfectly fine with a HMG that has better dps, mg42 suppresion and enough penetration to wipe the floor with a 222/251 (hurts luchs with the vet 1 ability).
Any argument you make against a decent HMG for OKW is null and void when you look at the 50 call.
@miragefla@Mr.Smith@BSpropagandapreachers
Stop saying it's similar to mg42, it isn't.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
In addition as pointed out the recovery is affected by taking damage.
They already have it and I haven't seen anyone complain that it is op. So why nerf it?
Posts: 2742
Meanwhile Vickers cries in the corner and wishes it could reliably suppress in the first burst but that's neither here nor there.
Posts: 2066
Along with original crew DPS drop, there comes a reinforcement cost decrease. From 25MP to 22MP per model. The quality of the patchnotes is not up-to-par. Thus, can you please also test your claims in game, before making a new thread about each issue?
In terms of suppression, yes. Unless MG34/MG42 get bit by the suppression bug which the DBP fixes.
If you are picking a live-version Maxim over a live-version MG34, I'm sorry, but you're clueless.
Posts: 1660
Isnt OKW have too strong infatry and things like AA HT ?
 |
|
|
67 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
71 | ||
|
|
|
|
14 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
