Changing the Lend-Lease commander
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
I propose to remove the Guards mobile group and replaced by the ability - access to US weapons rack
You can buy weapons with overpayment of +15 ammunition
The USSR had 220 captured BARPs
More than 9000 Bazook was delivered to the USSR
Posts: 1389 | Subs: 1
Posts: 245
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Hordes of cons/penals with zooks/bars and support of DShK and M4A2(76)? To much for the Motherland actually
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
P.S. Who needs the Guards Motorized Group? They are so rare
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
Problems solved
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
The problem of Lend-Lease commander: if against you OKW, the aircraft with fuel will not reach your base. In the end: a ton of ammo that has nowhere to spend. So you can buy weapons at a double price
P.S. Who needs the Guards Motorized Group? They are so rare
The plane is map depended. There are maps that is impossible to shoot it down.
Posts: 609
It probably wouldn't be a horrid idea to replace the DSHK with a .50 cal call-in as well, but that's all flavor.
Posts: 930
The plane is map depended. There are maps that is impossible to shoot it down.
false.
Give the guards Thompsons (same stats, just flavor) and allow them to upgrade to zooks. I wouldn't make such a change without tech-locking the M4C and modifying its stats a bit, though.
It probably wouldn't be a horrid idea to replace the DSHK with a .50 cal call-in as well, but that's all flavor.
No, fuck that. meanwhile WM will continue with the Stug E, puma, command P4 and tigers as call ins.
The whole purpose of this commander was to have a nice early game weapon (dshka) and a late game reliable vehicle. (which became almost unnecessary now that we have buffs on the T34.)
Posts: 609
No, fuck that. meanwhile WM will continue with the Stug E, puma, command P4 and tigers as call ins.
Tanks as a whole should be tied into tech, not just the M4C. Tweaking the M4C to be a strong AI unit (and maybe make it a tad cheaper) would create a similar dynamic to Ost T3 so the M4C wouldn't be eschewed for T34-76s.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
"The plane is map depended. There are maps that is impossible to shoot it down."
false.
Pls check your facts before claiming that something is false.
"On certain maps ability cuts the map corner making it impossible to attack/counter it."
https://www.coh2.org/guides/47110/resource-modification-in-coh2
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2
Posts: 175
Change lend lease by tiing sherman to tech and nerfing dushka a bit
Problems solved
++ Along with tying all medium call ins to tech, Stug E, Ostwind, Command Panter, Pershing, M10s, Bulldozer. The problem with this commander is that the MC4's don't really have distinct weaknesses towards infantry or Axis mediums. People win with this commander without tech at all. Early con and dshka spam provide plenty of map control and the MC4s are early and numerous enough to mop up, especially against OKW as that faction only has flawed early counters to blobs and garrisoned MGs.
Posts: 34
Change lend lease by tiing sherman to tech and nerfing dushka a bit
Problems solved
+1 on the sherman to tech
Posts: 245
Change lend lease by tiing sherman to tech and nerfing dushka a bit
Problems solved
HE proposed a buff and you proposed a nerf xD
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
HE proposed a buff and you proposed a nerf xD
Well, once you tie sherman to teching you can give him some love because right now he is a bit overpriced as unit
Livestreams
93 | |||||
34 | |||||
27 | |||||
17 | |||||
9 | |||||
161 | |||||
17 | |||||
7 | |||||
6 | |||||
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.653231.739+13
- 2.839223.790+2
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.592234.717-1
- 5.278108.720+29
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.645.928+5
- 8.922406.694+1
- 9.1122623.643+3
- 10.265138.658+2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
0 post in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Baqis73421
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM