Posts: 368
...
Are you sure that the halftrack managed to open fire in less than 4 seconds after finishing moving?
Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6
Do note that Stug-E becoming better, and more consistent vs stationary infantry is the intended design.
The trade-off here, is that stug-E should be considerably worse vs mobile infantry.
Also note that a Stug-E costs about half of the resources that a Brummbar requires. Thus, 2x Stug-E's should be somewhat comparable. Especially now that Stug-E packs inferior AT utility/durability to the Brummbar.
The days of cheesing the Stug-E commander are over.
However, Stug-E should still have -something- to draw people to picking this commander over the other commanders.
The real stress-test here is how Stug-E performs vs AT guns.
Posts: 440
... You are joking, right??
Sniper, mortar, 120mm mortar, SU barrage, Zis barrage, flamethrower engies or penals, ppsh conscripts, molotov, sachel.
Calling L2P on this one.
+1
In 4v4, if one player spams SU's its game over for any emplacement/trench you have.
+1 on this.
PzIV is in dire need for some love
Posts: 578
I would still prefer M-42 in T1 instead of PTRS. You know, more combined arms etc
Posts: 440
Me too.
Re: the satchel sticky - it sounds useful, but as others have said, the windup time needs to be lowered to give it a chance to hit somewhat reliably. The charge has a very long fuse, so there's no real reason it needs a long windup as well. The windup is actually a squad survivability issue (i.e. it makes the penal take damage from enemy supporting inf while he's winding up), which might no longer be necessary after all the penal changes.
So yeah, reduce the windup.
Posts: 4928
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
Posts: 1930
Do note that Stug-E becoming better, and more consistent vs stationary infantry is the intended design.
The trade-off here, is that stug-E should be considerably worse vs mobile infantry.
Also note that a Stug-E costs about half of the resources that a Brummbar requires. Thus, 2x Stug-E's should be somewhat comparable. Especially now that Stug-E packs inferior AT utility/durability to the Brummbar.
The days of cheesing the Stug-E commander are over.
However, Stug-E should still have -something- to draw people to picking this commander over the other commanders.
The real stress-test here is how Stug-E performs vs AT guns.
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
the new stug E is basically another brummbar at this point, with minor stats difference.
The vanilla stug E had two issue, it's too cheap (200mp 75 fuel is a steal) and the main gun stun is too powerful.
I think your solution is over complicating the issue by changing it into a new units.
and the doctrine itself have issue in 2v2+ because of the lackluster Tiger and Assault grenadier.
Posts: 2066
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
sound great tho but still need some love 1 M42 can keep opponent light tank at bay but what should we do with them in mid game cause it wasted pop cap too
Posts: 440
Posts: 2243
Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17
the new stug E is basically another brummbar at this point, with minor stats difference.
The vanilla stug E had two issue, it's too cheap (200mp 75 fuel 8 pop is a steal) and the main gun stun is too powerful.
I really have to stress how cheap the vanilla stug E is. At 200 mp 75 fuel it's only 5 fuel more expensive than the vanilla t70. The t70 might be the better infantry killer, but the stug E is just a much better overall package.
I think your solution is over complicating the issue by changing it into a new units.
and the doctrine itself have issue in 2v2+ because of the lackluster Tiger and Assault grenadier.
Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4
Permanently BannedButter by the fishes.
How deal a OKW player vs a a soviet which spam penals? He cann´t..only the AA FLakhalftrack help him.
Now the penals get a AT Hand rifle...and the halftrack is such a sensible car...
How can a OKW Player now with penal spam? the MG is crap, halftrack die like flys, volks cant stand penals, luchs is now crap...
soviet need only penals spam into t34/85...penals must have a weakpoint..or they get the new riflemen
PS: When will the OKW FLAK emplacement get a little love? It cost much manpower,gas, armypoints and a right doctrine.
a bofors laugh about this flak emplcement...their soldiers die in 2 secounds.
Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4
Permanently Banned Posts: 2243
its l2p man, coz HT have more range than PTRS, he have smoke. Luhs work fine too.
Posts: 543
Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4
Permanently Banned
uhm..yes..its cleary fai...one side need only spam one unit..and the other side need combine army (volks, mg, flack Ht) to deal with this one unit.
seems legit and totally fair.
Didnt u see that soviet now need only penals to deal with all enemy units... till heavy tanks?
Soviet can okw player own in the firs 5-6 minute to spam penals or Mgs....the okw is outplayed and can be push into his base by a mg lock.
Posts: 2723 | Subs: 1
Posts: 181
Not as useless as Panzergrenadiers with panzershrecks.
Man ptrs penals are useles vs infatry.
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
