data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c653a/c653aa86a1dfcd3e7a4b64e9b04397b330e04719" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11109/11109fa6ea39125cd7856ab809d5668cad4e5dfb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2127a/2127affc759abb0f9741835930629673fdc008b0" alt=""
Update: since JLI not infiltration unit anymore, it should get new icon (from gamefiles)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc8e7/dc8e74cd24b8299f4f387cb72bc92d197aeba2ea" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/354a7/354a7959c6fff3d004ae532eec5bb501ec3fb0e7" alt=""
Posts: 1389 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1389 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
Grenades Pack first iteration
Flame grenades
Posts: 416 | Subs: 1
Besides the obviously great and promising work, this picture is interesting. The guy appears to be missing the magazine in his Tommy Gun.
Posts: 1389 | Subs: 1
Since this thread got bumped... I just had an idea today. If possible could we let engineer's be able to cut their own wire without the minesweeper upgrade? Let's just say I'm sick of accidentally wiring in my own engineers by mistake lol
Besides the obviously great and promising work, this picture is interesting. The guy appears to be missing the magazine in his Tommy Gun.
Most of these icons look fantastic. One bit of feedback on the flame nades though: might want to consider changing the back ground to something more of a "cartoony" resemblance of a (camp) fire (like the icon on the flame grenade itself). On my first impression, it is not immediately clear the one on the right is supposed to be a Molotov and that the grenade's purpose is flame-based. The back ground looks more like an explosion than a fire. Basically I'd suggest something like this (but more realistic looking):
Somewhat similar there is the back ground for the Anti-Tank grenades also being an explosion and thus being a bit vague on immediately expressing its purpose. Since (afaik) they are all HEAT type weapons, you could see to replace the back ground with a shaped charge like icon, like this:
Here's the version of the Assault Section symbol from my mod:
Also, have you considered the general lack of portraits the British suffer from? Their MGs and mortars just reuse the Infantry Section one. I'd like to see your take on those.
Posts: 817 | Subs: 5
SneakEye already created portraits for UKF MG crew and Mortar team, and for OKW as well. You can found them in All-Units mod. Even several variants, based on Commandos!
Also, as far as i know, Commanders from the Past mod also has his own variants of these portraits.
I can create my own variants, but they will strongly overlapping with these ones.
Posts: 1389 | Subs: 1
Here you go
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1389 | Subs: 1
The new USF tech does not have any voice line or animation so it difficult to understand when it completed. Can we get a voice line?
Oct. 25th Update
Fixed a bug where the Brummbar and Panther were using incorrect speech lines
Posts: 1389 | Subs: 1
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1389 | Subs: 1
Posts: 2238 | Subs: 15
Posts: 1389 | Subs: 1
3in SPM M10 Mk I name for M10 british tank
The name "Achilles" was officialy a designation applied to both the 3-inch gun and 17 pounder versions (as Achilles I/II and Achilles Ic/IIc respectively) but was little used during the Second World War; at the time, the vehicle was called 17 pounder M10, or 17 pounder SP M10, or even occasionally, "Firefly". it has since become identified almost exclusively with the 17 pounder version.
Posts: 2238 | Subs: 15
Posts: 1389 | Subs: 1
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
38 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
28 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
831 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
19 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
9 |