Suggestion to reduce the British 17lbr anti-tank emplacement to 14 population from 20 population.
That's all.
17lbr to 14 Population
9 Jul 2016, 22:02 PM
#1
Posts: 362
9 Jul 2016, 22:11 PM
#2
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Seems like Relic does not care since the Brits release...
9 Jul 2016, 23:40 PM
#3
Posts: 4474
4 post about 17 pound 99% of the forum said yes to cost and pop reduction in all 4
Lelic still no changes well idk
Lelic still no changes well idk
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
10 Jul 2016, 00:39 AM
#4
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2
Apart from that and the eventual nerfs to British tanks which they will receive probably because of all of the complaints about them being cheap, I also strongly believe that the mortar emplacement needs to be replaced by a mobile mortar team and the mortar emplacement itself become a garrisonable (by mortars, and yes, it's possible) defensive position.
Other than that the complaints about the emplacements seems to have stopped, for now.
Other than that the complaints about the emplacements seems to have stopped, for now.
10 Jul 2016, 02:15 AM
#5
Posts: 692
14 is still too high. 12 pop at the most IMO.
Even with the lower pop I don't think I'd ever make it. It's way too fragile, and gets wrecked by pretty much everything except small arms fire.
10 Jul 2016, 02:30 AM
#6
Posts: 2066
14 is still too high. 12 pop at the most IMO.
Even with the lower pop I don't think I'd ever make it. It's way too fragile, and gets wrecked by pretty much everything except small arms fire.
It also can't shoot through buildings, but has brace, but is never used because useless.
Kappa
10 Jul 2016, 02:38 AM
#7
Posts: 253
Buff an emplacement? that sounds dangerous.
10 Jul 2016, 02:41 AM
#8
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
It's pretty much the only emplacement that's not ridiculous simply because it can't nuke infantry or counter its counter aka Bofors Barrage. You can walk up nearly anything to it and kill it with its best counter probably being other ATGs. Furthermore, it can actually be flanked, unlike the 360 Bofors murder machine.
It deserves less population and maybe a slight fuel decrease.
It deserves less population and maybe a slight fuel decrease.
10 Jul 2016, 02:48 AM
#9
Posts: 1930
17 pounder get outrange by the jagdtiger. even with lower pop cost, the 17 pounder is still screwed if the okw decided to bring a JT out.
10 Jul 2016, 02:52 AM
#10
Posts: 27
17 pounder get outrange by the jagdtiger. even with lower pop cost, the 17 pounder is still screwed if the okw decided to bring a JT out.
Definitely find that interesting that Tanks outrange the stationary emplacement. I wish this could be looked at in some way.
10 Jul 2016, 06:07 AM
#12
Posts: 48
It's non-doctrinal.
There is absolutely no reason to decrease its population or cost relative to the PaK43, when the PaK43 is far easier to destroy, and requires a doctrine.
There is no comparison.
There is absolutely no reason to decrease its population or cost relative to the PaK43, when the PaK43 is far easier to destroy, and requires a doctrine.
There is no comparison.
10 Jul 2016, 06:24 AM
#14
Posts: 9
Its an emplacement which is rarely used already. A pop reduction and maybe a slight reduction in fuel would be helpful. The pak 43 no doubt needs some love as well. These two units do not have to be carbon copies of each other but need to be balanced and useful to the game... which they arent as of now.
10 Jul 2016, 06:46 AM
#15
Posts: 673
see like I said you bring Soviet in post they are not even counted
I knew, that you will mention it, so I did it for fun
And really - B-4 for 20 popcap is normal? I just didn't want to make new thread for that.
10 Jul 2016, 06:48 AM
#16
Posts: 4474
no you should make a thread for dat
I knew, that you will mention it, so I did it for fun
And really - B-4 for 20 popcap is normal? I just didn't want to make new thread for that.
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
10 Jul 2016, 07:13 AM
#17
Posts: 1273
Do you guys mind not twisting this thread for Soviet propaganda purposes?
10 Jul 2016, 07:38 AM
#18
Posts: 708 | Subs: 1
20 pop is too much.
10 Jul 2016, 09:32 AM
#19
Posts: 362
17 pounder get outrange by the jagdtiger. even with lower pop cost, the 17 pounder is still screwed if the okw decided to bring a JT out.That's a completely different can of worms lol.
10 Jul 2016, 09:47 AM
#20
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
there's a 17 pounder in this game?
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
33 | ||
 |
|
|
24 | ||
 |
|
|
20 | ||
|
|
|
|
19 | ||
|
|
|
|
7 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.600215.736+15
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1107614.643+8
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.273108.717+24
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1234
Board Info
960 users are online:
960 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49102
Welcome our newest member, Rusel334
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Rusel334
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM