Cromwell Centaur AA Tank little bit OP?
Posts: 320
what is your opinion about the Centaur? I personally find it OP. It shreds infantry so fast, while the Ostwind or FlaK Halftrack only cries in a corner.
Posts: 1276
Posts: 97
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Posts: 609
Posts: 4474
Posts: 149 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1124
Posts: 2066
Posts: 4928
Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1
Posts: 17
Working as intended.
Well, I guess it's realistic, unlike most of the inf/armor interactions in this game. Not at all consistent with (or even close to) what should be comparable units in-game, however.
Posts: 444
Posts: 79
Ostwind should be like this.
Posts: 455
I will never understand why Allies need strong anti infantry tank, while their blobs are only punishable by Stuka.
Ostwind should be like this.
Or the OKW could get the Whirbilwind.
Posts: 369
Working as intended.
Because we all know RNG is not a factor in this game so one sample is enough proof of the Centaur being OP.
Posts: 1705
Posts: 276
In fact, I find it pretty useless seing as how Cromwell is 10x better than it, because it's cheaper, has anti tank, AND can do as good (if not better) anti infantry if coupled with some crush micro.
Posts: 708 | Subs: 1
Livestreams
97 | |||||
37 | |||||
26 | |||||
10 | |||||
8 | |||||
5 | |||||
1 | |||||
634 | |||||
26 | |||||
20 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.653231.739+13
- 2.838223.790+1
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.590233.717+6
- 5.278108.720+29
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.645.928+5
- 8.922406.694+1
- 9.1118621.643-1
- 10.265138.658+2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
2 posts in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, KETTA
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM