Login

russian armor

Small balnce change about IR halftrack

12 Jun 2016, 18:10 PM
#21
avatar of ArnoLaz

Posts: 266

This makes sense, i'm loving it.

Also i would suggest some small increase in payload - like 5/10 fuel, if it stays in state it's now.
12 Jun 2016, 18:27 PM
#22
avatar of PencilBatRation

Posts: 794

This suggestion is far from a small change, you basically want it to be used as front line spearhead unit.


What is up with these rage threads asking to nerf the least used axis abilities/units lately?
12 Jun 2016, 19:15 PM
#23
avatar of insaneHoshi

Posts: 911

jump backJump back to quoted post11 Jun 2016, 08:24 AMNEVEC
Valentine pays 90 fuel for this wallhack, when okw gets it almost for free by stock.


Doesnt Valentine give you 360 degree detection while the IR HT gives a little band in a 90 degree cone?
12 Jun 2016, 20:16 PM
#24
avatar of CookiezNcreem
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15



Doesnt Valentine give you 360 degree detection while the IR HT gives a little band in a 90 degree cone?


ir ht is 60 degree sweep, valentine is 180 degrees. funfact there, funfact there.
12 Jun 2016, 20:52 PM
#25
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

And i think both have gamebreaking issues with suppression (correct me but i don't think they fix it)
12 Jun 2016, 21:06 PM
#26
avatar of DarkDanie

Posts: 12

We must not forget the free maphack/Radio Intercept from some sovjet doctrines!
13 Jun 2016, 02:27 AM
#27
avatar of What Doth Life?!
Patrion 27

Posts: 1664

Unit would make perfect sense in Overwatch Doctrine. Not sure if it needs to be part of the core army. Would much rather have a regular 250 or 251 halftrack.


+1 to 251 ht for OKW and I also like the OP's idea.
13 Jun 2016, 04:10 AM
#28
avatar of sinthe

Posts: 414

Irht is junk. Waste of popcap and resources.
13 Jun 2016, 05:32 AM
#29
avatar of NEVEC

Posts: 708 | Subs: 1



Doesnt Valentine give you 360 degree detection while the IR HT gives a little band in a 90 degree cone?


45 times bigger fuel cost, twice more degree detection.
13 Jun 2016, 11:49 AM
#30
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post13 Jun 2016, 04:10 AMsinthe
Irht is junk. Waste of popcap and resources.


lel :romeoPls:
13 Jun 2016, 11:59 AM
#31
avatar of PencilBatRation

Posts: 794

jump backJump back to quoted post13 Jun 2016, 05:32 AMNEVEC


45 times bigger fuel cost, twice more degree detection.
Comparing the valentine with a halftrack, jeez.
13 Jun 2016, 13:29 PM
#32
avatar of MoerserKarL
Donator 22

Posts: 1108

is the IR halftrack still broken? ( You can see some units on the minimap, without using the search light)
13 Jun 2016, 13:40 PM
#33
avatar of Mr.Smith

Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17

is the IR halftrack still broken? ( You can see some units on the minimap, without using the search light)


Yes. Occasionally some units bug out and become permanently visible. I've had this happen to me some weeks ago, and I don't know what exactly causes it.
13 Jun 2016, 14:00 PM
#34
avatar of Rappy

Posts: 526

This thread is perfect example of peoples lack of objectivity. Choosing one particular modest special item from a faction and saying its not fair cos the other factions don't get it, at least not as cheap (valentine - a TANK!!!) or as invulnerable to AA (Brits free recon - covering almost entire map). Ir-ht OP? Get a grip guys.
13 Jun 2016, 14:01 PM
#35
avatar of RealName

Posts: 276

jump backJump back to quoted post13 Jun 2016, 04:10 AMsinthe
Irht is junk. Waste of popcap and resources.


Situational at most. Don't know if change is needed, I barely ever use it.
13 Jun 2016, 16:36 PM
#36
avatar of Hans G. Schultz

Posts: 875 | Subs: 2

I'd like it to start off with a normal search light that doesn't see through buildings, walls and trees, but still greatly increases your normal sight to where ever it is pointing. Then it can be upgraded to the IR version for 90 munitions.
13 Jun 2016, 17:14 PM
#37
avatar of NEVEC

Posts: 708 | Subs: 1

Comparing the valentine with a halftrack, jeez.


Not me started it, jeez.
13 Jun 2016, 19:20 PM
#38
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2



Yes. Occasionally some units bug out and become permanently visible. I've had this happen to me some weeks ago, and I don't know what exactly causes it.


There's 2 bugs with the IR HT.

One were you can make the beam stay on a single direction (although it's unreliable to put it on the direction you want) and the other is the one you describe.

Permanent spots happens when suppression is involved while the beam is on top of the units. I'm not sure if you just need the beam to pass when enemy units are affected by suppression or retreat while suppressed/beamed.

13 Jun 2016, 22:12 PM
#39
avatar of GhostTX

Posts: 315

OKW should have a stock unit that can cloak and cease fire so it can walk around the map to scout and totally ambush tanks. And it should be able to cap while cloaked. It be neat if it were put on, I dunno, the Raketen or something.


And infrared is line of sight, not omnipresent radar. But hey, in reality land the .50 cal would smoke all light armor, too.
14 Jun 2016, 00:57 AM
#40
avatar of Putinist

Posts: 175

There's 2 bugs with the IR HT.


There is also a bug where the receiving end will not see that they are being scanned.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

800 users are online: 1 member and 799 guests
mmp
1 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49082
Welcome our newest member, 23winlocker
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM