Login

russian armor

How to beat super-aggressive Ostheer

19 Mar 2016, 20:51 PM
#1
avatar of Kallipolan

Posts: 196

Recently, I've been coming across an Ostheer strat in my Brit games which I'm at a loss for how do deal with. I wanted to know if anyone had any advice.

Basically, the Ost player is very aggressive and targets my cut-off with a Gren/Sniper/MG combo which Tommies can't really deal with, and uses a Pio squad or two to cap his own side of the map. He then techs up as fast as possible to get a 222 out very early, followed usually by another 222 straight away. To make matters worse, some Ost players have realised Brit players don't have access to a minesweeper in the very early game, and have been spending their early munis on S-minefields on vital points like fuel point, cut-off e.t.c.

I have no idea how best to counter this. It feels like there are just too many different threats that all require different counters. I need a sniper of my own to threaten his and take out the MG team, I need Sappers to clear mines and I need an AT gun to prepare for the 222. When the Ost player techs fast, waiting for an AEC just doesn't feel like an option since it comes out too late. How do I deal with this kind of thing? It feels like against good sniper micro there's nothing to do but try and avoid the area of the map where the sniper is, but this lets the Ost player take whatever part of the map he wants, even if that means my cut-off.
20 Mar 2016, 06:29 AM
#2
avatar of ashxu

Posts: 124

Ah yes the one massive flaw in the UKF faction. The fact that they get absolutely shit on by aggressive early games. If you lose your AEC against 222 stacking you've pretty much lost the game because Piats are so fucking awful.

Personally I've tried going MG -> IS -> MG as my opening build to combat aggressive options then hold out until an AEC so I can combat 222s. If you have Mobile Assault that helps as you can put the Flamethrowers to use to make up for IS being not that great.
22 Mar 2016, 12:44 PM
#3
avatar of wouren
Senior Social Media Manager Badge

Posts: 1281 | Subs: 3

Sounds like a good question for DevM of he's still around.
23 Mar 2016, 08:02 AM
#4
avatar of Spinflight

Posts: 680

S-mines are a real problem early game, particularly on some maps where your cutoff is also on your retreat path. Angoville south for instance, I've had S-mines placed on the northern cutoff which can't be ignored as the strat point, VP and munitions further north can't be contested without retreating squads through them.

Had some success with a UC to counter MG42s and especially the Ostheer sniper early game, trouble is it is a pure sacrifice as they don't stand a chance against 222s. Can run them through minefields but a) you won't completely clear it b) UC takes heavy damage from S-mines c) UCs with heavy damage blow up the moment someone looks as them in the wrong way. Saying that all of Ostheer's early units bar maybe Grens are very vulnerable to a UC.

I've given up on AECs against Ostheer unless I pick tactical support to get recovery engineers and therefore some of my resources back ( which can also clear the minefields of course). 444 or 666 wins easily against an AEC. In fact they win easily against anything you can build until Cromwells.
23 Mar 2016, 09:23 AM
#5
avatar of zarok47

Posts: 587

I recommend vickers in buildings (straight of the bat, map depandent, but then again, one can contruct trenches)

Seeing as vickers in buildings will stop the mg42 and grenadiers, has a lower chance to get hit by snipers (and with vet 1, it becomes a big threat to said sniper) and the 222 has a hard time dealing with buildings anyway.

Counters exist in the form of the flame pio, but you should target that one first.

Hope this helps.
23 Mar 2016, 19:04 PM
#6
avatar of Mr.Smith

Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17

I don't have a sound strategy vs MG42 & Sniper & 222. However, I know the following:

1. You need to recognise the following strategic opportunity:
- A Vet1 Brit sniper is a hardcounter to 222's since he can snare them reliably
- By default, a Brit sniper will have a very dangerous time getting to Vet1 in time (countersniping, 222's can yolodive in base)
- However, killing the enemy sniper with your own sniper will get him Vet1 (or very close to it)
- Having cleared the enemy sniper, you can continue sniping against garrisons (Brit sniper never misses vs garrisoned squads)
- When the 222 comes out, you have the answer out (vs a crippled 222, you only need to supplement with PIATs or AT gun)

2. The performance of 222 is currently bugged vs infantry.

The 222 has 2 weapons, the autocannon (that goes *BOOM* *BOOM* *BOOM*), and the coaxial MG (that goes *RATATATATATA*).

The autocannon is crap vs infantry, and deals almost no damage vs infantry when they are garrisoned. Inversely, the MG absolutely shreds infantry, even they are garrisoned.

However, according to Miragefla, the MG has a horrible time tracking infantry (I think it has trouble aiming upwards).

Thus, if you put your infantry in a Trench, they will evaporate instantly. If you put your infantry on a 2-story building and the 222 starts aiming towards the upper story, they will survive for a few minutes.

In fact, given the right building, your sniper has a chance to outdamage the 222 before he dies (provided that both the 222 and the sniper are completely unsupported).

- Never retreat your sniper vs the 222, unless you have a backup plan (AT/PIATs or Mines covering the retreat path)
- Place your infantry in buildings (NOT TRENCHES) and see if the MG of the 222 can engage vs them. If the MG doesn't fire, you're safe. If the MG starts firing, then it's time to start dancing.
23 Mar 2016, 19:21 PM
#7
avatar of Spinflight

Posts: 680

I thought the MG on the 222 was off centre ( 15 degrees rings a bell), hence shredded things at close range but constantly missed at medium? Could be wrong and would like to know for sure.

The main problem against 222s is the ease with which they can baserape you. UCs against the base defence guns ( particularly OKW) are a joke by comparison. Seem to recall seeing that the 25pdrs in base do have an unused AT role but basically Brits badly need a T1 snare or counter as 222s plus sniper can make the early game nigh on impossible without clairvoyance.

24 Mar 2016, 00:51 AM
#8
avatar of Grumpy

Posts: 1958

jump backJump back to quoted post22 Mar 2016, 12:44 PMwouren
Sounds like a good question for DevM of he's still around.


Don't take this the wrong way, but when someone is complaining about aggressive Ost play with good sniper micro, DevM is more likely to be part of the problem than part of the solution.
24 Mar 2016, 01:58 AM
#9
avatar of wouren
Senior Social Media Manager Badge

Posts: 1281 | Subs: 3

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Mar 2016, 00:51 AMGrumpy


Don't take this the wrong way, but when someone is complaining about aggressive Ost play with good sniper micro, DevM is more likely to be part of the problem than part of the solution.
Well I'm saying he knows what counters his tactic.
24 Mar 2016, 02:19 AM
#10
avatar of Tomakaze
Patrion 14

Posts: 141

You could try special weapons regiment and see how those AT tommies work out. A rushed bofors can be pretty solid on some maps. These are just suggestions and don't reflect my opinion on the issue.
24 Mar 2016, 03:16 AM
#11
avatar of Kallipolan

Posts: 196

I still haven't really found the solution, and honestly I've pretty much given up on Brits in 1v1 as a result. I'm sure I'll come back to them after a while, but 222 rush every game is just so fucking boring.

My best tactic is to just try and hold onto early fuel, rush tech and get both a sniper and an RE squad. Then, try and nail the inevitable 222 with a mine. Most Ost players will be pretty aggressive with that thing to try and rush the sniper so it is sometimes possible to bait them over the mine, but overall still a pretty weak and inconsistent solution. Not to mention, even if you get the kill the second 222 will still be out long before AEC.

AT tommies kinda help, but not all that much. They can't really threaten a single 222 since they kill it pretty darn slow, and 2 222s just mow them down.
24 Mar 2016, 17:29 PM
#12
avatar of Nemesis10192

Posts: 54

I still haven't really found the solution, and honestly I've pretty much given up on Brits in 1v1 as a result. I'm sure I'll come back to them after a while, but 222 rush every game is just so fucking boring.

My best tactic is to just try and hold onto early fuel, rush tech and get both a sniper and an RE squad. Then, try and nail the inevitable 222 with a mine. Most Ost players will be pretty aggressive with that thing to try and rush the sniper so it is sometimes possible to bait them over the mine, but overall still a pretty weak and inconsistent solution. Not to mention, even if you get the kill the second 222 will still be out long before AEC.

AT tommies kinda help, but not all that much. They can't really threaten a single 222 since they kill it pretty darn slow, and 2 222s just mow them down.


Quite frankly I think the 222 is just too good at the moment. Its dirt cheap, shits on light vehicles and many light tanks, doesn't really take damage from infantry and can just gun up to them in cover and chew them down also.

It was fine as it was but now with 320 hp it can take some AT hits and still have a good safety buffer to get away whereas before it would often be flirting with engine/gun damage criticals.

I'm having trouble against them as USF also. They really shut down the M20 (lt tier) so hard whilst being much cheaper than an m20 anyway and still doing fine versus infantry. Kinda forces you to to go boring 4 rifle captain stuart every game but then you are at the mercy of snipers or you can try an aaht after m20 but then you have too much of your army in two light vehicles that are paper and get rekt by paks that you don't know where they will be. At least USF has snares with vet though!

I mean comeon its like 200/15 or something for fucksake, way too cheap!
24 Mar 2016, 18:38 PM
#13
avatar of Kallipolan

Posts: 196

https://youtu.be/_WXwApviEd4?t=40m10s

Looks like even for top players, the same thing happens...

I guess maybe its a balance issue rather than a L2P issue? I kinda like that Tommies not having an AT snare makes the Brits a bit unique, but seems like given how good the 222 is and how quickly it can be out, Brits are really gonna struggle until there is something you can do to at least fend them off with Tommies.
24 Mar 2016, 19:34 PM
#14
avatar of Aerohank

Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1

It's AEC rush or bust with the Brits.
25 Mar 2016, 01:30 AM
#15
avatar of Grumpy

Posts: 1958

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Mar 2016, 01:58 AMwouren
Well I'm saying he knows what counters his tactic.


I was joking. Besides, most of the good players don't come to this forum anymore so it's really unlikely that DevM would respond.
25 Mar 2016, 02:18 AM
#16
avatar of Thamor

Posts: 290

If you have watched Helpinghans play style. Build free sandbags for green cover. Then you can always win vs mg/grens. Against sniper if the enemy have it make your own sniper...
30 Mar 2016, 02:11 AM
#17
avatar of Mistah_S

Posts: 851 | Subs: 1

OP BASED POST


Holy Crap! Why didnt I think of this?!

Thanks OP, I will forever be using this strategy now.
It's gonna be GG Brits from here onwards
30 Mar 2016, 03:43 AM
#18
avatar of wouren
Senior Social Media Manager Badge

Posts: 1281 | Subs: 3

jump backJump back to quoted post25 Mar 2016, 01:30 AMGrumpy


I was joking. Besides, most of the good players don't come to this forum anymore so it's really unlikely that DevM would respond.

:(
30 Mar 2016, 04:28 AM
#19
avatar of Dullahan

Posts: 1384

Bren carrier is a solid option for getting your units out of suppression, pressuring the sniper and even backcapping with weak squads instead of reinforcing them.

For the 222 you really should get PIATs instead of the AT gun. With a bit of micro it's pretty easy to hit the 222 due to its huge model and wonky turning rate. (Anytime it rounds a corner it stops to a crawl.)




What I would recommend is 2 tommies and a bren, tech up and get a sapper and unlock weapon racks. PIAT distribution you have a few options, but I would suggest doing 1 per tommy so you don't reduce their combat effectiveness too much and have room for a bren later. Plus spreading out AT makes it much harder for your opponent to find a weak point to hit with their light vehicles. (Same principle applies with bazookas or panzerschrecks.)

After that you can do whatever.



Tactics still matter. Pressuring him so he can't attack you, or taking advantage of garrisons, are both reasonable options. The big takeaway here is "USE FUCKING PIATS" because people seem to forget them as an option entirely.






30 Mar 2016, 06:24 AM
#20
avatar of jackill2611

Posts: 246

FYI, Bren Carrier ignores S-mine fields ))
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Rosbone: @aerafield You would be surprised by how many people are into genital mutilation :snfPeter:
Last Tuesday, 21:22 PM
aerafield: @LimaOscarMike I would say nowadays is a decent time to try CoH3. If you loved CoH2 however, there is a solid chance you're gonna dislike CoH3
Last Monday, 17:04 PM
LimaOscarMike: My laptop can't even run COH3. Should I get them on my Series X or is it dead yet?
Last Saturday, 05:10 AM
Rosbone: One of my last major gripes about Coh3. Price is still too high I feel for growth. But progress is always good.
Last Saturday, 04:43 AM
Rosbone: I am not 100% sure but I think Relic actually fixed up the skirmish menus a little last patch. If so, thank you and keep it coming.
Last Saturday, 04:39 AM
Osinyagov: Suddenly, coh2 is slowly dying, but you can play it, playerbase still big enough
09 Apr 2025, 17:00 PM
Osinyagov: Wow, i remember you from zansi and vali videos, good old memories
09 Apr 2025, 16:58 PM
Beinhard: o7 miss this game and zansi
09 Apr 2025, 14:09 PM
Lady Xenarra: @Willy Pete The lack of April Fools this year is odd lol
02 Apr 2025, 01:34 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus :*(
02 Apr 2025, 00:16 AM
dasheepeh: it was an honor guys :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:34 PM
aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st" :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:29 PM
Rosbone: @dasheepeh I guess that means this site is officially dead :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:19 PM
dasheepeh: no comic sans font for april 1st this year?
01 Apr 2025, 19:56 PM
Willy Pete: @Lady Xenarra this you? https://i.imgflip.com/3e4thi.jpg
01 Apr 2025, 02:53 AM
Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
01 Apr 2025, 02:36 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy :clap:
27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM
Soheil: Coh2 still broken server ?
25 Mar 2025, 18:27 PM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. :snfQuinn:.
24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM
Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
Willy Pete: @Nickbn you didn't ask a question, and this is a chat box...
20 Mar 2025, 13:11 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone it's incredibly rude to speak on someone elses behalf, especially when a question is directly adressed to them. I understand your passion for the subject at hand but I want to hear from him.
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
Rosbone: @Nickbn No, I am just saying people should not be using any Relic owned forum since they have proven they ban anyone who says true things about Coh3.
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone do you speak on his behalf? I didn't know. In that case keep us updated please.
18 Mar 2025, 16:47 PM
Rosbone: #RelicModdedEchoChamber
16 Mar 2025, 17:54 PM
Rosbone: @Nickbn True except, the only people on the Relic Discord/Reddit/Steam are brain washed monkey zealots. They wont even understand what @adamírcz is talking about. Anyone else is banned.
16 Mar 2025, 17:54 PM
Nickbn: @adamírcz might be a better idea to voice this to relic directly than to voice it here, in a shoutbox of a nearly deade fansite #justsaying...
16 Mar 2025, 16:36 PM
webdesign-muenchen-w: @Rosbone it is sick
14 Mar 2025, 22:09 PM
aerafield: @adamírcz aren't the first two disconnects free every day?
14 Mar 2025, 19:26 PM
Rosbone: It is so unlike Relic to punish its fans and community.
14 Mar 2025, 12:07 PM
adamírcz: So, I just got a leaver penalty without even getting onto the loading screen because of the game disconnecting, bravo Relic
14 Mar 2025, 10:45 AM
Rosbone: It is an indicator of the very short sighted capitalist view that plagues any company where leadership does not understand the product.
13 Mar 2025, 20:00 PM
Rosbone: They dont care about Coh3 or Coh in general. They are just trying to grab cash by ripping off the small user base they have.
13 Mar 2025, 19:58 PM
Rosbone: Just making mistake after mistake after mistake.
13 Mar 2025, 19:57 PM
Rosbone: It is clear they crapped out an unfinished game. And are now barely supporting it as they make new smaller games. Coh3 is stillborn. It will be meh for at least another 2-4 years. Meaning they killed the whole franchise instead of growing it.
13 Mar 2025, 19:56 PM
Rosbone: For a thing they could fix in minutes. Literally minutes.
13 Mar 2025, 19:53 PM
Rosbone: If I did play coh3 and was mainly a skirmish player, I would be pissed and probably stop playing. And it has been like this since release. Why? I would not tell my friends to buy a game I am not even playing. Lost sales and angered users.
13 Mar 2025, 19:53 PM
Rosbone: I am just saddened how Relic keeps hurting themselves by not fixing 5 minute things like menus. Why anger users with stuff that could be fixed in minutes???
13 Mar 2025, 19:50 PM
Rosbone: I was wondering why people think I was raging. I think it was when I said "because coh3 sucks so bad". That was not my opinion. Just a general feel from top players/streamers. I dont play Coh3 and have NO opinion of it.
13 Mar 2025, 19:48 PM
OKSpitfire: You can rage as often as you like btw, you usually manage to make it pretty funny.
12 Mar 2025, 11:18 AM
Rosbone: So it was a systemic failure across multiple disciplines and check points.
12 Mar 2025, 04:30 AM
Rosbone: Knowing how companies work, I imagine a new hire making the menus. The API they are using is complicated and things were hard to figure out. But at some point QA or management should have addressed these things. Usually within 6 months of starting.
12 Mar 2025, 04:29 AM
Rosbone: @theekvn I dont hate Coh3 or Relic. I just dont understand how you work on Coh3 for like 7 years and the menu system is worse than if a Programming 101 student made it. Feel free to explain it to me.
12 Mar 2025, 04:07 AM
theekvn: + 33% dmg rear hit was best deal ever.
12 Mar 2025, 04:00 AM
theekvn: KT just need fuel debuf from 15% to 50%, Ele arc of fire- aim time improve and they are good to go
12 Mar 2025, 03:59 AM
theekvn: and please Rosbone,I know you hate Coh3 to the bone due to your drama with relic, Still, Can you give a proper point of view instead of raging ?.
12 Mar 2025, 03:54 AM
theekvn: you rather go 76 to unity Whizbang 2.0 or go home.
12 Mar 2025, 03:52 AM
theekvn: also US tier 4 is 145f and Sherman pen 140 nerf is too much.
12 Mar 2025, 03:52 AM
theekvn: Whizbang lock behind CP, meanwhile stuka is techtree progress
12 Mar 2025, 03:51 AM
KoRneY: @aerafield It's possible that it is underpriced for what it is capable of now, no need to go full retard and take it immediately as a massive problem. It costs 60 more MP than a pz.3 and in 2v2 the barrage can be quite strong.
07 Mar 2025, 19:14 PM
OKSpitfire: I do like that they made the Stuka more expensive instead of nerfing it into the ground though. Found it pretty unsatisfying to use before that buff a while back....
06 Mar 2025, 16:35 PM
aerafield: USF already is by far the shittiest faction in terms of countering blobbing and turtling, now they supposedly have one overtuned tool locked behind a BG and it's immediately a massive problem?
06 Mar 2025, 13:33 PM
Lady Xenarra: I think post-2.0 Whizbang buffs, the price is too low esp since the Stuka got nerfed in cost too. Speaking of which, how exactly is one supposed to successfully dive this Sherman in disguise? Med tank spam running into SSFs?
06 Mar 2025, 12:13 PM
OKSpitfire: A powerful, doctrinal unit that outperforms stock stuff? Colour me shocked! :P
06 Mar 2025, 10:49 AM

Livestreams

unknown 9
unknown 9
unknown 3

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

406 users are online: 406 guests
3 posts in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
32 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53935
Welcome our newest member, Tiina098fin
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM