Can Relic put it back in the game instead of actual T-34 model? It still below than models of WFA and UKF, but much better, than actual model of T-34!
Thank you for your attention!
Good rejected things in CoH 2
19 Feb 2016, 21:26 PM
#1
Posts: 1389 | Subs: 1
Some days ago, user with nickname Sirlami (Thank you very much man) have posted screen with some unused models and mechanics in CoH 2. One of the models take my attention - T-34 with extra stuff on the hull. I've seen this model before (In 2011-2012) when CoH 2 was in development. But for some unknown reason Relic rejected it.
Can Relic put it back in the game instead of actual T-34 model? It still below than models of WFA and UKF, but much better, than actual model of T-34!
Thank you for your attention!
Can Relic put it back in the game instead of actual T-34 model? It still below than models of WFA and UKF, but much better, than actual model of T-34!
Thank you for your attention!
19 Feb 2016, 21:34 PM
#2
Posts: 40
1++++++++++++
HR
21 Feb 2016, 15:06 PM
#3
Posts: 1389 | Subs: 1
I think, this theme with rejected things for CoH 2 can be more larger. I have looked some old screenshots (see below) and find, that old avatars of USSR/Ostheer units and doctrines are much better! They don't have any emblems and thin places. And the same time they have saturated colours and good background (just like avatars of WFA/UKF units and doctrines)!
Why i am posting this? Because i don't like current decorative design of east factions. I want to see high quality design for all factions. I will post some other design issues in the future.
Here is some screenshots from 2013:
And some old doctrines avatars from 2013:
Dear moderators! Can You change the name of topic to "Good rejected things in CoH 2"? Thank you!
Why i am posting this? Because i don't like current decorative design of east factions. I want to see high quality design for all factions. I will post some other design issues in the future.
Here is some screenshots from 2013:
And some old doctrines avatars from 2013:
Dear moderators! Can You change the name of topic to "Good rejected things in CoH 2"? Thank you!
21 Feb 2016, 15:09 PM
#4
Posts: 1740
Dear moderators! Can You change the name of topic to "Good rejected things in CoH 2"? Thank you!
Done.
Thanks for this very interesting topic!
It is though God by command has withdrawn every other throne.
And God is saying 'No. These people will deal with me alone.'
And God is saying 'No. These people will deal with me alone.'
21 Feb 2016, 15:19 PM
#5
Posts: 254
One thing is that the ptrs sounded much better in the alpha.
21 Feb 2016, 15:20 PM
#6
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
The T34 with stuff is early T34 model.
I bet they were part of scrapped Overwhelming Armor doctrine, where you could call-in shitty T34(yes, thy have managed to make T34 even more shitty).
I bet they were part of scrapped Overwhelming Armor doctrine, where you could call-in shitty T34(yes, thy have managed to make T34 even more shitty).
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
21 Feb 2016, 15:21 PM
#7
Posts: 318
the 223 was used in Ardennes assault as a mobile radio jammer
21 Feb 2016, 18:57 PM
#8
Posts: 446 | Subs: 2
The only thing I'd love to see return here is the ability for tanks to pull things.
AND BY THINGS I mean stuff like PaK43, ML-20s PogChamp Kreygasm
Because sometimes like eedeot I build too far back and then have popcap tied up in a useless emplacement. I want high risk way to transport them, and this provides the perfect avenue.
AND BY THINGS I mean stuff like PaK43, ML-20s PogChamp Kreygasm
Because sometimes like eedeot I build too far back and then have popcap tied up in a useless emplacement. I want high risk way to transport them, and this provides the perfect avenue.
Dear Lord, teach me to be generous; to give and not count the cost; to fight and not heed the wounds; to work and ask for no reward, save that of knowing I am doing Your will.
Argumentation, disagreement, and debate are critical for success.
The most important type of diversity is viewpoint diversity.
Argumentation, disagreement, and debate are critical for success.
The most important type of diversity is viewpoint diversity.
21 Feb 2016, 19:05 PM
#9
Posts: 278
Towing could be a pretty neat mechanic. It would allow emplacements to be a bit more vulnerable, and open up a really distinctive strat. If they fucked it up, though, it could end in an awful turtle-grind fest.
21 Feb 2016, 19:22 PM
#10
Posts: 107
Soviet wire from the alpha. Uuuuh.
21 Feb 2016, 19:25 PM
#11
Posts: 466
man the interface looks much better. just the commanders on the right blocks some view.
1. Relic bans, not me. 2. It stands in the rules: If you are banned more often, the duration increase and can lead in the end to permaban 3. The Case is bigger as you guys think. So pls step 1 step away pls. 4. I am not a player in the 4vs4 cup, because of RL work.
21 Feb 2016, 20:49 PM
#12
Posts: 1891
The Skdz 251 should have an open top.
The Fascisti Will Pay.
21 Feb 2016, 20:53 PM
#13
Posts: 1702
The dumbest thing they did is alpha is remove all the unique vet 1 ability from soviet/ostheer and replaced them with tripfire/medkit because it made the game "too complex" or some other nonsense like that.
Good thing they seem to learned from this when designing USF/OKW/Brits
Good thing they seem to learned from this when designing USF/OKW/Brits
21 Feb 2016, 21:34 PM
#14
Posts: 2561
For a short time during WFA alpha, you could have your infantry ride on T-34s. The animation was never completed though.
21 Feb 2016, 21:36 PM
#15
Posts: 1389 | Subs: 1
The Skdz 251 should have an open top.
Relic can take "Walking Stuka" model (with benches inside) , delete roket launchers, and it will be beautiful 251 with open top.
Also i am frustrating of german vechicles name (Relic tried to compare 2 official german designation (Sd.Kfz. , PzKpfw and colloquial expression (Panzer 4, Stuka zu FuB))
I realy don't understand, why german tanks ( PzKpfw IV,V,VI) using different designation (Panzer 4, PzKpfw V and Pz. VI)? It looks ugly! This little issues and many others make me sad, and very very sad when i take a look on grapics, bugs and balance problems.
This game can be more-more better!
P.S. Yes, i am a fanboy of beauty, refinement and succession
21 Feb 2016, 21:39 PM
#16
1 Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4
I remember in the concept art there were a lot more customization options. Things like adding decorations to your trenches and things like this.
Also lets not forget all the women partisans and voices they took out for reasons.
Also lets not forget all the women partisans and voices they took out for reasons.
Tobis "Complete Throw"
Someone asked what my avatar was from... I really don't know.
Defeated Paula and knocked him out of 2v2 Anniversary Cup
Someone asked what my avatar was from... I really don't know.
Defeated Paula and knocked him out of 2v2 Anniversary Cup
21 Feb 2016, 22:14 PM
#17
Posts: 1617
I remember in the concept art there were a lot more customization options. Things like adding decorations to your trenches and things like this.
Also lets not forget all the women partisans and voices they took out for reasons.
Refund or riot!
They removed women partisans and weather changes!
21 Feb 2016, 22:21 PM
#18
Posts: 670
I think in the early concept stage the Soviets had actual doctrine trees (shock, guard, nkvd with penals) with the Regimental HQ changing its appearance when a doctrine had been chosen.
Shock was cash
Shock was cash
I myself bought 14 OKW factions during a Steam sale last year for alt accounts
21 Feb 2016, 23:07 PM
#19
Posts: 154
Was towing ever in to begin with?
22 Feb 2016, 01:44 AM
#20
1 Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4
Was towing ever in to begin with?
I think it might have been in some campaign cutscenes or something.
Tobis "Complete Throw"
Someone asked what my avatar was from... I really don't know.
Defeated Paula and knocked him out of 2v2 Anniversary Cup
Someone asked what my avatar was from... I really don't know.
Defeated Paula and knocked him out of 2v2 Anniversary Cup
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
84 | ||
 |
|
|
27 | ||
 |
|
|
12 | ||
 |
|
|
10 | ||
 |
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
167 | ||
|
|
|
|
13 | ||
 |
|
|
9 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.653231.739+13
- 2.839223.790+2
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.592234.717-1
- 5.278108.720+29
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.645.928+5
- 8.922406.694+1
- 9.1122623.643+3
- 10.265138.658+2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
10
Download
1245
Board Info
693 users are online:
693 guests
0 post in the last 24h
0 post in the last week
28 posts in the last month
0 post in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49427
Welcome our newest member, Baqis73421
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Baqis73421
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM