UC Fuel change is in there, notes are missing the change.
Penals buff?
FEBRUARY 25TH UPDATE - RELEASE NOTES
18 Feb 2016, 23:14 PM
#41
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Penals buff?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
18 Feb 2016, 23:16 PM
#42
7 
Posts: 1664
Penals buff?
Brad said it will accompany Maxim nerfs in a later patch.
18 Feb 2016, 23:17 PM
#43
Posts: 175
Other British commanders aren't used cause they were nerfed into oblivion. This happened to the British Artillery commander, he was good in the alpha, but now hes not worth using.
Nerfing the used British commanders isn't going to make the others more viable.
I somewhat agree, although for example, I see crocodile every now and then and it's still very effective. It's just that artillery cover is such a crutch ability that it overshadow every other commander by far. Now it's (hopefully) brought in line.
UKF has issues (i.e. ost snipers), just nerfing commanders won't make others more viable. Fixing the issues (including nerfing OP abilities like artillery cover, or heavily buff sexton and the british artillery commander) will.
18 Feb 2016, 23:18 PM
#44
Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6
whats with the artillery cover still working in fog of war and also, why this barrage on infantry pins instantly? it's still good at dealing damage, why this suppression
18 Feb 2016, 23:18 PM
#45
Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17
Does the Panzerwerfer now get a correct damage modifier vs garrisons now, or will it still keep instawiping garrisons?
(Katyusha has 25% damage modifier; the Panzerwerfer currently has 100% damage modifier - i.e., no damage reduction)
Otherwise, the patch seems great.
(Katyusha has 25% damage modifier; the Panzerwerfer currently has 100% damage modifier - i.e., no damage reduction)
Otherwise, the patch seems great.
You have a great idea that improves the QoL aspects of the game? Please, drop your idea here:
https://www.coh2.org/topic/57860/some-qol-suggestions
Check out Cruzz's DPS calculator:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7gwy65JLbSRMEJ3M2ZPandMMW8/view?usp=sharing
(Download the file, open it with your browser)
https://www.coh2.org/topic/57860/some-qol-suggestions
Check out Cruzz's DPS calculator:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7gwy65JLbSRMEJ3M2ZPandMMW8/view?usp=sharing
(Download the file, open it with your browser)
18 Feb 2016, 23:19 PM
#46
Posts: 1122
No bufss to underpowered commanders make me sad.
Also i have impression calliope wasnt nerfed enought, and still capable of wiping everything on med range, hopefully i am wrong.
Also i have impression calliope wasnt nerfed enought, and still capable of wiping everything on med range, hopefully i am wrong.
18 Feb 2016, 23:21 PM
#47
Posts: 1144 | Subs: 7
No bufss to underpowered commanders make me sad.
Also i have impression calliope wasnt nerfed enought, and still capable of wiping everything on med range, hopefully i am wrong.
previously it fired 3 salvos, now it only fires 2.
18 Feb 2016, 23:22 PM
#48
Posts: 680
"it's still good at dealing damage, why this suppression"
Never seen anyone whinge about the inf suppression before. All of the OP threads were moaning about the crits on their tanks...
Never seen anyone whinge about the inf suppression before. All of the OP threads were moaning about the crits on their tanks...
18 Feb 2016, 23:24 PM
#49
Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17
previously it fired 3 salvos, now it only fires 2.
Are they at least reducing the amount of rockets on the first salvo?
Currently it fires 10 rockets in the first salvo (each of which is roughly 25%-50% stronger than the Katyusha rocket), which is quite OP.
You have a great idea that improves the QoL aspects of the game? Please, drop your idea here:
https://www.coh2.org/topic/57860/some-qol-suggestions
Check out Cruzz's DPS calculator:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7gwy65JLbSRMEJ3M2ZPandMMW8/view?usp=sharing
(Download the file, open it with your browser)
https://www.coh2.org/topic/57860/some-qol-suggestions
Check out Cruzz's DPS calculator:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7gwy65JLbSRMEJ3M2ZPandMMW8/view?usp=sharing
(Download the file, open it with your browser)
18 Feb 2016, 23:24 PM
#50
Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6
"it's still good at dealing damage, why this suppression"
Never seen anyone whinge about the inf suppression before. All of the OP threads were moaning about the crits on their tanks...
yea, but now it's still a dead zone for all infantry in the radius of artillery cover
18 Feb 2016, 23:24 PM
#51
1 Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15
No m1919 nerf? BabyRage
Good patch overall. Just keep them cumming please
Might want to hotfix the veterancy bugs though GabeN
Good patch overall. Just keep them cumming please
Might want to hotfix the veterancy bugs though GabeN
18 Feb 2016, 23:28 PM
#52
Posts: 468
M20 still puts mines and has a bazooka crew, so I dont really see the issue other then if you leave your M20 unsupported the 222 now has a chance to get away (still MINES). I will go with what I went before, try and flank the sniper with my terminators... errr rifles I mean. The 222 is not gonna kill the M20 FASTER it just has more health. It still is useless against anything USF after the M20 is dead.
... no one is going to waste 60 muni on a mine to kill a 222...
If someone is being chased by 222, decrews vehicle, the 222 will just destroy the M20 while it's unoccupied. The bazooka will not force the 222 to retreat as it now has higher HP.
I personally think having a 215 mp 15 fuel vehicle counter a 340 mp 20 fuel vehicle with a potential 70 muni upgrade... is still off. That's just me though. Wondering how everyone else feels about this.
 | Playercard of BeRyan | |||||||||||||||
|
18 Feb 2016, 23:29 PM
#53
Posts: 680
"yea, but now it's still a dead zone for all infantry in the radius of artillery cover"
It is called Artillery Cover. Which involves artillery shooting at things. Those things are unlikely to start breakdancing and partying at the joys of receiving incoming.
Did you expect it to heal the Axis infantry it hits???
It is called Artillery Cover. Which involves artillery shooting at things. Those things are unlikely to start breakdancing and partying at the joys of receiving incoming.
Did you expect it to heal the Axis infantry it hits???
18 Feb 2016, 23:31 PM
#54
Posts: 148
yea, but now it's still a dead zone for all infantry in the radius of artillery cover
It costs over 300 munitions. What should it do?
18 Feb 2016, 23:32 PM
#55
Posts: 88
... no one is going to waste 60 muni on a mine to kill a 222...
If someone is being chased by 222, decrews vehicle, the 222 will just destroy the M20 while it's unoccupied. The bazooka will not force the 222 to retreat as it now has higher HP.
I personally think having a 215 mp 15 fuel vehicle counter a 340 mp 20 fuel vehicle with a potential 70 muni upgrade... is still off. That's just me though. Wondering how everyone else feels about this.
Wont happen if M20 is supported. Likewise no decent Ost player will leave its sniper unsupported against possible M20 rush... Also that comment about the mine makes me question if I should take you serious at all.
18 Feb 2016, 23:33 PM
#56
Posts: 132
Is there still free recon plane from UKF?
Posts: 559 | Subs: 17
Penals buff?
I'm not aware of any changes to that unit this patch.
18 Feb 2016, 23:34 PM
#58
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
previously it fired 3 salvos, now it only fires 2.
And it's a joke then. First and 2nd salvo are what were doing insane damage on top of having a similar damage profile as PW. Unless against OKW trucks, it's gonna be the same.
I'll rather have it fire equal number or a bit less rockets but spaced out.
Abandon critical: i hope this only applies to tanks. I'm all for this but it should not apply to light vehicles and just engine damage for light tanks.
Artillery cover: i guess no fix to no damage to friendly infantry : /
CalliOP: see response above.
PW: i hope they fix garrison damage modifier
222: hmmm is it still gonna cost 210mp 15f ?
Bugfixes: still seeing units in garrison through FoW, loiters duration not fixed, still phasing tanks.
PD: Sturzdorf GG
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
18 Feb 2016, 23:34 PM
#59
Posts: 1024 | Subs: 1
Is there still free recon plane from UKF?
THIS
It costs over 300 munitions. What should it do?
Zeroying arty from OKW is also 300 muni and do almost nothing
18 Feb 2016, 23:36 PM
#60
Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6
It costs over 300 munitions. What should it do?
nerf DPS and lower cost to 200? seems legit
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
24 | ||
 |
|
|
12 | ||
 |
|
|
33 | ||
 |
|
|
17 | ||
|
|
|
|
12 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
0 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.35157.860+16
- 4.599234.719+7
- 5.934410.695-1
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
11
Download
1261
Board Info
393 users are online:
393 guests
0 post in the last 24h
12 posts in the last week
24 posts in the last month
12 posts in the last week
24 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49888
Welcome our newest member, Saltmars
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Saltmars
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM