Greyhound....

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 4928

Make it perform more like a T-70.

Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1

Can we focus on factions that realy need buffs and not USF who doesn't?

BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.

Multi Quote

Posts: 253

Time travel back to COH1 when it was good

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

Comes too late and too expensive, this unit should be CP2 and 30 fuel max.

But I guess like many, it is mainly the entire commander who sucks hard.

Posts: 708 | Subs: 1

Make it 2 cp and come at the same time as M20. Better and more expensive version of M20 that don't need lieutenant.

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

13 Jan 2016, 02:39 AMNorthWeapon

Vet 3 M8 Greyhound is like SdKfz 222 w/ Spotting Scopes

So is M20.

And vet3 isn't even close to spotting scopes, which increase sight range by 100%.

25 Nov 2015, 11:09 AM$nuffy

Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.

Good Stuff here

Multi Quote

Posts: 7

I personally think it performs pretty well for its intended role being a flank harasser and infantry sniper

The main problem with the greyhound is it comes out way too late to be quite as effective maybe make it 2cp instead of 3 and lower fuel cost to 35 maybe

Posts: 304

change it to 2cp!

Posts: 2779

Should be an upgrade of M20, requires RE modify it at base sector.

Posts: 513

13 Jan 2016, 06:48 AMJohnnyB

Can we focus on factions that realy need buffs and not USF who doesn't?

And what factions would that be? OKW, Wehr? Lel.. please enlighten me with your 1000+ ladder knowledge

Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1

13 Jan 2016, 11:51 AMpugzii

And what factions would that be? OKW, Wehr? Lel.. please enlighten me with your 1000+ ladder knowledge

My place in the ladder is irrelevant as long as I am matched with opponents of the same rank and play all factions (balance at place 1000+ is no different from balance in top 100 if we consider what I said before the brakets) so I don't care about your assertion which is also irrelevant.

To your biased profile surprise, those factions will be, in this order:

1. UKF certainly.
2. Ostheer, but to a lesser extent.

Both related to early game stage. Is this answer satisfying for your place in the ladder? Oh wait, we don't know what that is, because no playercard showing in signature or in the avatar section.

Multi Quote

Posts: 615

13 Jan 2016, 06:48 AMJohnnyB

Can we focus on factions that realy need buffs and not USF who doesn't?

Don't immediately come to the conclusion that a thread is automatically biased and trying to buff a faction. This isn't about the factions or fanboy-ism, this is about individual units.

All dead units deserve to be revived whether its from Faction A or B.

Sdkfz 250 w/ LMG Gren or PG
M8 Greyhound
M3 Assault Group
M1 baby AT gun for Soviets
PMD mines
Assault Grens
Bulldozer Sherman
etc.
Major Arty
UKF Base Howies
AEC
17 Pounder AT Emplacement
OKW Elite Armor Doctrine tank commander upgrade
etc. Stuff that miragefla is currently fixing