So how is new OKW, good; bad; balanced; or overperforming? If you can't decide, don't vote on the poll yet, get a feel for them before doing so.
*Poll is now closed to preserve first day reactions(votings)
Posts: 474
Posts: 322
Posts: 474
Where is the middle ground here
Posts: 824
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
This thread and all others like it should be time locked for like 4 hours so everyone can get a feel for the faction before bitching.
I do like how you took the initiative and put fair options for the poll and not:
1. Nerf OKW
2. Nerf OKW
3. NERF OKW
Posts: 2885
Posts: 1006
This thread and all others like it should be time locked for like 4 hours so everyone can get a feel for the faction before bitching.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Posts: 230
Permanently BannedAbusing OKW, Day 1:
My dear calendar, 16min is enough to bring on Panzer IV and Sturmtiger
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
11 cp I thought took atleast 20 minutes.
Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3
Abusing OKW, Day 1:
My dear calendar, 16min is enough to bring on Panzer IV and Sturmtiger
Posts: 1585 | Subs: 1
Posts: 2561
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
Posts: 1276
Posts: 230
Permanently BannedPosts: 871
Posts: 1122
Posts: 824
in 3v3's and 4v4's they appear to be overperforming by a wide margin. Massive blobbing, little to no impact from unit losses/destroyed trucks.
LeIg changes are good, tech still needs to be adjusted my a large margin, truck upgrades may need to be implemented, kubal is fine, Goliath needs smaller AOE or reduced speed.
Posts: 680
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
152 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
15 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 |