Login

russian armor

Shouldn't UKF have AT snare?

30 Nov 2015, 20:29 PM
#63
avatar of Vermillion_Hawk

Posts: 224

People should learn to play around faction weaknesses instead of asking for mirroring, there are tools given by relic, people should try to learn how to use them. If they turn out inefficient, adjustments have to be made - however for that the patch has to be released first.


Meanwhile, OKW needs non-doctrinal suppression. :foreveralone:
30 Nov 2015, 20:40 PM
#65
avatar of Kobunite
Patrion 15

Posts: 615

Now - keep this on topic. If I have to clean up another off topic, flaming mess on this thread it's getting closed.

That's enough bickering for today.
30 Nov 2015, 20:41 PM
#66
avatar of BeefSurge

Posts: 1891

Buff UKF sniper to pre nerf levels, swap Sniper and AEC.

30 Nov 2015, 20:43 PM
#67
avatar of dOPEnEWhAIRCUT

Posts: 239

jump backJump back to quoted post30 Nov 2015, 10:22 AMKatitof


Why aren't you strategist on .org



jump backJump back to quoted post30 Nov 2015, 10:22 AMKatitof


Ah, thats right, because you're good only at inaccurate remarks and low level trolling.


:foreveralone:
30 Nov 2015, 21:01 PM
#68
avatar of Flying Dustbin

Posts: 270 | Subs: 1

Why is the AEC/Bofors choice a thing? Would having both of them at the same time be too OP somehow? If it's such a big thing just make the AEC and Bofors cost a bit more instead of locking them behind upgrades as an attempt to make the faction seem deeper than it is.

If Relic is so obsessed with the Hammer/Anvil gimmick then why didn't they go all the way and make the Mortar Pit and 17 Pounder choices you can make over the Sexton and Firefly too?
Halftrack or Forward HQ could have been an Offensive/Defensive choice too, instead of locking things into extra micro-transaction commanders.

More on topic maybe they should add the HEAT grenade into the Mills bomb package so people might buy the damn thing for once.
30 Nov 2015, 21:04 PM
#69
avatar of AchtAchter

Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3



Meanwhile, OKW needs non-doctrinal suppression. :foreveralone:


They won't get one, so time to adapt and learn to play around. If its not possible, adjustments have to be made, but it's the same case with UKF snare.
30 Nov 2015, 21:29 PM
#70
avatar of ferwiner
Donator 11

Posts: 2885

jump backJump back to quoted post30 Nov 2015, 20:17 PMAladdin


First of all, I know and I was not disagreeing with AchAtcher either

Second of all, OKW has snare in two very common doctrines

Third of all, go back read first post of this thread, Shreck is not snare, but what is snare? snare is a tool to deal with armor rush or to deter the early armor push, which Shreck provides u with THE BEST infantry based AT weapon of the game (without need to upgrade, and can be purchased even in non-friendly territory) so Actually OKW has the best of all army.

Fourth of all, it seems that u have almost never played Brits or against OKW at all, so not gonna bother discussing that with u


Its true that ukf will struggle against light vehicles a lot next patch. This is due to having all their AT abilities locked in T2, even freakin' mines. But I dont thing snare is the solution. We already have 3 factions and 3 doctrines with snare. They should deal with early armor the way okw does, maybe moving a mine to IS would solve some problems? Or making boys a non doctrinal upgrade, while the doctrine would give only the snare? Or both? What do you think guys?
30 Nov 2015, 23:03 PM
#71
avatar of Vermillion_Hawk

Posts: 224

Boys as a non-doctrinal upgrade would be lovely but Relic seems to dislike giving us AT rifles as non-doctrinal weapons on mainline infantry. I'm hesitant about revamping the PIAT, though. I think a snare is the best option for the UKF, you can even give them the ridiculously shitty Riflemen rifle grenade animation for it and I wouldn't care.
30 Nov 2015, 23:07 PM
#72
avatar of AchtAchter

Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3

Why is the AEC/Bofors choice a thing? Would having both of them at the same time be too OP somehow? If it's such a big thing just make the AEC and Bofors cost a bit more instead of locking them behind upgrades as an attempt to make the faction seem deeper than it is.



I don't know, I find it stupid too. When you build a bofors and a AEC you gonna delay your tech so hard that your rather cut your own flesh by doing so!
1 Dec 2015, 00:09 AM
#73
avatar of Mittens
Donator 11

Posts: 1276

Why dont we just give them the at nade as an upgrade with the nade package?
increase its MP cost or add a slight 5 fuel extra cost (making it 20 fuel)

I like the sniper being able to snare but at the same time it makes the idea of a 222 being a counter not viable. On the other hand Brits lack a srys snare unless they go AT Rifle section.


Someone tell relic
1 Dec 2015, 00:18 AM
#74
avatar of AchtAchter

Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3

Why dont we just give them the at nade as an upgrade with the nade package?
increase its MP cost or add a slight 5 fuel extra cost (making it 20 fuel)

I like the sniper being able to snare but at the same time it makes the idea of a 222 being a counter not viable. On the other hand Brits lack a srys snare unless they go AT Rifle section.


Someone tell relic


My honest opinion is that Snares on mainline infantry as UKF would make Piats OP as fuck.
1 Dec 2015, 00:22 AM
#75
avatar of Mittens
Donator 11

Posts: 1276



My honest opinion is that Snares on mainline infantry as UKF would make Piats OP as fuck.


Well you either give them a snare or you buff Piats to not be so inaccurate. This issue is a relic design issue.
Whats the damage of the PIAT vs SHRK vs Zook?

Honestly if we dont give them a snare the sniper may as well be good as dead as getting him to vet 1 and keeping him alive may almost be impossible. The counter sniper 222 would be able to push the sniper and with out a proper snare im afraid that the 222 meta in 1v1's would revert the game back to the game post launch on like patch 3 before the 222 was nerfed into oblivion.

Regardless we dont decide the direction of the game, relic does so why even bother arguing

1 Dec 2015, 00:42 AM
#76
avatar of iTzDusty

Posts: 836 | Subs: 5

Snare is still on the vet 1 crit shot ability.

Stop forum warrioring and play the balance mod.
1 Dec 2015, 01:00 AM
#77
avatar of AchtAchter

Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3



Well you either give them a snare or you buff Piats to not be so inaccurate. This issue is a relic design issue.
Whats the damage of the PIAT vs SHRK vs Zook?




They do 120 dmg, just as much as a Schreck. A zook does 80 damage.
The problem however is not the damage, it's the fact that PIATs do deflection damage of 80. That means your PIATs don't need to penetrate in order to do damage.

That means all you need to do in order to take out heavy tanks with high Armour is to snare them and blob enough PIATs, the tank will eventually get destroyed after a few seconds, since a PIAT shot will always do damage. And Piats are cheap as fuck with 40 ammo cost.
1 Dec 2015, 21:12 PM
#78
avatar of Aladdin

Posts: 959



They do 120 dmg, just as much as a Schreck. A zook does 80 damage.
The problem however is not the damage, it's the fact that PIATs do deflection damage of 80. That means your PIATs don't need to penetrate in order to do damage.

That means all you need to do in order to take out heavy tanks with high Armour is to snare them and blob enough PIATs, the tank will eventually get destroyed after a few seconds, since a PIAT shot will always do damage. And Piats are cheap as fuck with 40 ammo cost.


Don't u think the same exact thing actually happens now with grens snare and pgs shrecks?!! there is only a difference that allies tanks have less armor and hp and go down faster to the mighty laser guided shrecks which never miss

Protip: keep ur armor away from infantry snare units, when snare can bring it to lower than 75 hp %! ur problem solved and ur heavy tank won't go down! :)
1 Dec 2015, 21:15 PM
#79
avatar of Bulgakov

Posts: 987

jump backJump back to quoted post30 Nov 2015, 20:17 PMAladdin


First of all, I know and I was not disagreeing with AchAtcher either

Second of all, OKW has snare in two very common doctrines

Third of all, go back read first post of this thread, Shreck is not snare, but what is snare? snare is a tool to deal with armor rush or to deter the early armor push, which Shreck provides u with THE BEST infantry based AT weapon of the game (without need to upgrade, and can be purchased even in non-friendly territory) so Actually OKW has the best of all army.

Fourth of all, it seems that u have almost never played Brits or against OKW at all, so not gonna bother discussing that with u


You're right, I should play some Brits against OKW. I definitely lack insight from that perspective. But please keep discussing it. I think it can be useful for both of us.

I think snare is something that causes engine damage. I agree with you that the shrek is an effective infantry AT weapon though so perhaps OKW doesn't need one as much as Brits. But still, you must have seen the effect a rushed light vehicle has against OKW. Can be so damn hard to stop it Wiping on retreat.
1 Dec 2015, 21:22 PM
#80
avatar of Aladdin

Posts: 959



You're right, I should play some Brits against OKW. I definitely lack insight from that perspective. But please keep discussing it. I think it can be useful for both of us.

I think snare is something that causes engine damage. I agree with you that the shrek is an effective infantry AT weapon though so perhaps OKW doesn't need one as much as Brits. But still, you must have seen the effect a rushed light vehicle has against OKW. Can be so damn hard to stop it Wiping on retreat.


u're right, but what light vehicle can have such an effect on OKW?! mainly soviet's or USF's right? by the time soviet's t70/m5 hits (7-9 mins) or the USF's m20 (5 min) or AA truch or Stuart (7-8mins), don't u think OKW player can easily equip enough shrecks (and easily afford a rocketen at t0) to deal with them at ease not to be crashed by the light vehicle?!!! and if not it's the mistake by OKW player

but on the other hand when an army u play against doesn't have snare or such ur vehicle can rush into their face as long as u know the one AT gun is decrewed and own the whole army with something like a half health luchs
3 users are browsing this thread: 3 guests

Livestreams

unknown 25
unknown 16
unknown 13
Canada 2
Germany 1

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

955 users are online: 955 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49079
Welcome our newest member, Rodfg15
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM