Posts: 224
People should learn to play around faction weaknesses instead of asking for mirroring, there are tools given by relic, people should try to learn how to use them. If they turn out inefficient, adjustments have to be made - however for that the patch has to be released first.
5 
Posts: 615
Posts: 1891
Posts: 239
Why aren't you strategist on .org
Ah, thats right, because you're good only at inaccurate remarks and low level trolling.
 | Playercard of Dadical | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 270 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3
Meanwhile, OKW needs non-doctrinal suppression.
1 
Posts: 2885
First of all, I know and I was not disagreeing with AchAtcher either
Second of all, OKW has snare in two very common doctrines
Third of all, go back read first post of this thread, Shreck is not snare, but what is snare? snare is a tool to deal with armor rush or to deter the early armor push, which Shreck provides u with THE BEST infantry based AT weapon of the game (without need to upgrade, and can be purchased even in non-friendly territory) so Actually OKW has the best of all army.
Fourth of all, it seems that u have almost never played Brits or against OKW at all, so not gonna bother discussing that with u
Posts: 224
Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3
Why is the AEC/Bofors choice a thing? Would having both of them at the same time be too OP somehow? If it's such a big thing just make the AEC and Bofors cost a bit more instead of locking them behind upgrades as an attempt to make the faction seem deeper than it is.
1 Posts: 1276
Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3
Why dont we just give them the at nade as an upgrade with the nade package?
increase its MP cost or add a slight 5 fuel extra cost (making it 20 fuel)
I like the sniper being able to snare but at the same time it makes the idea of a 222 being a counter not viable. On the other hand Brits lack a srys snare unless they go AT Rifle section.
Someone tell relic
1 Posts: 1276
My honest opinion is that Snares on mainline infantry as UKF would make Piats OP as fuck.
Posts: 836 | Subs: 5
| Playercard of Dusty | |||||||||||||||
|
Devils_Brigade: man captain molo why dont you just buy and m3 drive that around instead of playing coh
Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3
Well you either give them a snare or you buff Piats to not be so inaccurate. This issue is a relic design issue.
Whats the damage of the PIAT vs SHRK vs Zook?
Posts: 959
They do 120 dmg, just as much as a Schreck. A zook does 80 damage.
The problem however is not the damage, it's the fact that PIATs do deflection damage of 80. That means your PIATs don't need to penetrate in order to do damage.
That means all you need to do in order to take out heavy tanks with high Armour is to snare them and blob enough PIATs, the tank will eventually get destroyed after a few seconds, since a PIAT shot will always do damage. And Piats are cheap as fuck with 40 ammo cost.
Posts: 987
First of all, I know and I was not disagreeing with AchAtcher either
Second of all, OKW has snare in two very common doctrines
Third of all, go back read first post of this thread, Shreck is not snare, but what is snare? snare is a tool to deal with armor rush or to deter the early armor push, which Shreck provides u with THE BEST infantry based AT weapon of the game (without need to upgrade, and can be purchased even in non-friendly territory) so Actually OKW has the best of all army.
Fourth of all, it seems that u have almost never played Brits or against OKW at all, so not gonna bother discussing that with u
Posts: 959
You're right, I should play some Brits against OKW. I definitely lack insight from that perspective. But please keep discussing it. I think it can be useful for both of us.
I think snare is something that causes engine damage. I agree with you that the shrek is an effective infantry AT weapon though so perhaps OKW doesn't need one as much as Brits. But still, you must have seen the effect a rushed light vehicle has against OKW. Can be so damn hard to stop it Wiping on retreat.
 |
|
|
50 | ||
|
|
|
|
26 | ||
 |
|
|
17 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
100 | ||
 |
|
|
67 | ||
 |
|
|
32 | ||
|
|
|
|
20 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
