Specifics of the idea, you all contribute...
AT gun "dig in" ability
25 Nov 2015, 22:10 PM
#1
Posts: 79 | Subs: 1
Maybe it would be good to give all AT guns a dig in option to help resist against tank fire.
Specifics of the idea, you all contribute...
Specifics of the idea, you all contribute...
25 Nov 2015, 22:12 PM
#2
Posts: 1122
It called camouflage.
25 Nov 2015, 22:14 PM
#3
Posts: 1384
They already have a big shield thingy.
25 Nov 2015, 23:36 PM
#4
Posts: 79 | Subs: 1
Camo does nothing after the first shot, i mean "dig in" similar to the ability "hull down" but for AT guns.
25 Nov 2015, 23:38 PM
#5
Posts: 1217
It would be great if the doctrinal "hull down" ability for tanks would also work on AT guns. Then people would finally use it. Of course the bonuses would have to be adjusted accordingly.
25 Nov 2015, 23:47 PM
#6
Posts: 1124
Nice idea. Should take a few seconds to dig in. And another few to dig out. So there is a risk vs. Reward deal. +1
26 Nov 2015, 10:45 AM
#7
Posts: 1216
Aren't AT guns in general pretty resistant to tank fire?
And aren't all crew weapons pretty much invulnerable to destruction as long as they are manned anyways?
And aren't all crew weapons pretty much invulnerable to destruction as long as they are manned anyways?
26 Nov 2015, 10:53 AM
#8
10 
Posts: 4785 | Subs: 3
Nice idea somehow. Maybe reward it with a slightly higher Firespeed or something and in Return it turns into an emplacement, that has a healthbar and if it down to zero the gun and the emplacement are dead
26 Nov 2015, 11:24 AM
#9
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
they would have a very limited arc of fire too, so may not even unbalanced
26 Nov 2015, 11:42 AM
#10
Posts: 3
It would be great if the doctrinal "hull down" ability for tanks would also work on AT guns. Then people would finally use it. Of course the bonuses would have to be adjusted accordingly.
This would be a great idea but maybe it would become simcity because of it. It should be a lot weaker then emplacements like super pak and the 17 pounder. I like the idea tho.
26 Nov 2015, 12:31 PM
#11
Posts: 509
Idea sounds nice. But mechanics wise i see a problem.
If we make tank shells do less dmg to 'dug in' ATGs wont that also affect mortar shells?
If we make tank shells do less dmg to 'dug in' ATGs wont that also affect mortar shells?
26 Nov 2015, 13:17 PM
#12
Posts: 742 | Subs: 1
Increase some offensive stats ? ( hit chance, rof, pen ?), increase resistance, but cant rotate while dig is active, that would be so nice.
26 Nov 2015, 13:28 PM
#13
Posts: 1168
ATGs aint already good enough?
Just screen with inf like you should and they will snipe tanks.
Just screen with inf like you should and they will snipe tanks.
26 Nov 2015, 13:29 PM
#14
Posts: 1003
I like this idea. 
I want to have the same chance, to win for each side.
26 Nov 2015, 13:33 PM
#15
Posts: 2819
+1. They need a form of digging in feature.
All posts made are about situations in 2v2's. Not a 1v1 player.
26 Nov 2015, 16:33 PM
#16
8 Posts: 2470
meh. i'm not really against it but i see it encouraging camping and causing pathing issues. interesting idea though.
26 Nov 2015, 17:00 PM
#17
Posts: 279
What would this change? An AT gun looking at a contested area is already hard to dislodge. AT guns already have a "setup" and "packup" time to reward flanking. Tanks that will get scared off by dig in, are already scared off by its normal setup, and tanks that can kill AT guns, like centaur, will still be able to kill them. Besides, it might marginalize the use of the pak 43 and the 17-lber.
26 Nov 2015, 19:02 PM
#18
Posts: 1384
And aren't all crew weapons pretty much invulnerable to destruction as long as they are manned anyways?
Are they now? That's lame. It used to punish players who didn't repair their weapons.
26 Nov 2015, 19:11 PM
#19
8 Posts: 2470
Are they now? That's lame. It used to punish players who didn't repair their weapons.
they are. it's in the patchnotes from a month or two back. might be september.
26 Nov 2015, 19:28 PM
#20
Posts: 987
Are they now? That's lame. It used to punish players who didn't repair their weapons.
Aye but they'll still be destroyed if weapon health is 0 and the weapon gets decrewed.
Let's keep it constructive
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
7 | ||
|
|
|
|
0 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.42963.872+7
- 2.52875.876+1
- 3.303163.650+3
- 4.12644.741-1
- 5.312114.732+8
- 6.289112.721+1
- 7.14760.710-2
- 8.271158.632+2
- 9.6717.798+5
- 10.13665.677+4
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
13
Download
1329
Board Info
1145 users are online:
1145 guests
5 posts in the last 24h
33 posts in the last week
59 posts in the last month
33 posts in the last week
59 posts in the last month
Registered members: 52202
Welcome our newest member, Hanstine
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Hanstine
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM