Balance Preview Patchnotes

Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2015, 20:01 PMGluhoman

G43 on 1 cp, flamethrowers on 1 cp. Ppsh for cons still on 3 cp. Hmmmmm

Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2015, 20:01 PMGluhoman

G43 on 1 cp, flamethrowers on 1 cp. Ppsh for cons still on 3 cp. Hmmmmm

Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2015, 20:01 PMGluhoman

G43 on 1 cp, flamethrowers on 1 cp. Ppsh for cons still on 3 cp. Hmmmmm

Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2015, 20:01 PMGluhoman

G43 on 1 cp, flamethrowers on 1 cp. Ppsh for cons still on 3 cp. Hmmmmm

Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2015, 20:14 PMATCF

Lower squad sizes, also do you think that those peasants deserve "good weapons" before proving their worth on the battlefield?

(Panzerschrecks on Sturmpioneers would turn late game in to Massive tank spam with Sturmpioneers repairing them and shooting AT rockets at flanking enemy armor, basically the unit would become Godlike)

Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2015, 20:01 PMGluhoman

G43 on 1 cp, flamethrowers on 1 cp. Ppsh for cons still on 3 cp. Hmmmmm

Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2015, 19:22 PM__deleted__

Please dont give shreck to sturmpios.

They are not meant to be panzershreck squad.

They will need to place mines , fight off ifnantry , tanks , reapir tanks and clear field defences in 1 unit ?

This can lead into 1 think - blobing.

Also it would be indirect nerf to some doctrines (feuersturm) becuase they wont allow flametrower + shreck on one squad whitch woul mean even more Spios you need.

Also no one would build voks , it will be Spio spam + psuhing kubel.

And to add on this they will vet like crazy with shreck.


Please no skreck on them , there are like milion reason why not shreck on mid range assault rifle engineer

Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2015, 23:04 PMCultist_kun

I would say, give volks x2 Panzerbüchse with same AT, AI and accuracy of PTRS performance and Pfaust unlock, for 60 ammo.

This would kill few problems:

1) Volks blobs
2) Volks shitty AI (better then before but still shity meh)
3) No insta-killing tanks

And then work on raketenwerfer and make it less shitty.

Volks would have more\less same perfomance vs light armor. Schreck is out-of-place for OKW, there is no way you can emplement it without it being OP\useless. OP on volks, useless on Sturmpio, too expensive on Obersoldaten.

Also with 100% fuel income, I would say that OKW don't need to rely on schrecks.

Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2015, 23:15 PMSwitzerland

That wouldn't solve spam without thier cost increasing, what your describing here is the old Tank Hunter a Tactic conscript blobs. If they did get the rifles, they would need the stats that the conscript upgrade PTRS have. But an idea non the less good suggestion.

Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2015, 23:24 PMAladdin

The main reason for all complains about Shreck, is how strong it is (dmg, pen, etc on the core unit of a faction) and since OKW float mp like crazy, it's too easy to spam volks and giving them now cheap shrecks

One big issue with the next patch will be how fast OKW can get a very strong light vehicle, such as flak ht or luchs, when a faction like UKF still struggles with mp and hard to counter light vehicles with no snare option!

That's completely unfair/broken all factions have snare(or fast shreck for OKW) except UKF, specially considering how useless piats are (for not being rockets and hence reliable)

Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2015, 23:56 PMAchtAchter

Please stop that MP float myth. Any good player will invest his MP into squads as soon he has the manpower for it - Infantry spam to the max. Sure they are players that only build 3 volks and then complain that okw has nothing to offer, but that's the wrong kind of play and top players don't do that.

In addition in the preview you have increased MP costs for teching and mainline infantry, if you'd play it you'd notice that its harder too accumulate mp with OKW.