4 
Posts: 444
WC51 is lackluster in a lackluster commander, with limited utility and the rare possibility of being partially refunded. Unit needs a buff, reducing cost would just cause it to be spammed because of retrofit.
Relic pls. | Playercard of Looney | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 515
Not to mention the half track which gets melted by lmg's alone
Posts: 770
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Last time i checked the usf doesnt need a stronger early game. price is fine because faction differences. bloody hell compare the allied halftracks with the ost tracks and you see the allies have a clear advantage.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
4 Posts: 444
Last time i checked the usf doesnt need a stronger early game. price is fine because faction differences. bloody hell compare the allied halftracks with the ost tracks and you see the allies have a clear advantage.
| Playercard of Looney | |||||||||||||||||||
|
7 
Posts: 1664
Posts: 509 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1484
| Playercard of WingZero | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
Give WC51 the ability to capture resource sectors.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Give WC51 the ability to capture resource sectors.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 770
Its not about stronger early game in any way.
Its about DIFFERENT and VALID early game option.
 |
|
|
7 | ||
|
|
|
|
22 | ||
 |
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
