ISU-152 feels really weak

Jump back to quoted post5 Nov 2015, 16:43 PMCookiezNcreem

make concrete piercing shells into a timed AP ability like USF AT gun AP rounds for more penetration for like 20 secs for example while keeping the cost

Jump back to quoted post5 Nov 2015, 15:41 PMhannibalbarcajr

It already has Elefant like range, except it can actually kill ATG and infantry whereas elefant cannot. Comparing it to Elefant, I think I prefer the ISU-152 since it can make an enemy pay no matter what their force composition is. 200 penetration at far range doesn't feel quite right for a 152mm cannon so moving it up a little bit would be fine. But it shouldn't be as good as an Elefant at AT becuase it is a hybrid assault gun, not a tank destroyer as OP stated.

Jump back to quoted post5 Nov 2015, 15:10 PMTAKTCOM

Jagtiger is cheap. Battlegroup Headquarters +Call in, easy.

1 PAK + 1 STUG. Or jagdpancer 4 + some folks or Raket.

Your telepathy failed. Now, ISU still one-shot infantry like they do...always? But its effectiveness against german armor is low. Particularly because you use HE-shells. If you not use HE-shells come sherks and PAKs. But this is not problem.
The problem is german heavy TD. ISU will lost once they come into battelfield. And all you may say - "don't take ISU if germans take heavy TD". Thx C.O. But again i don't use ISU anymore.

You foget "flank & smoke". And you words mean nothing, because i don't see ISU in multiplayer. I play all fractions and see ISU rarely as well as T-34-76, penals or SU-85.

Jump back to quoted post5 Nov 2015, 17:56 PMsiuking666

If you want to counter German armor?
IS2 / SU85 + SU76 / T34-85 with Mark target.

Jump back to quoted post5 Nov 2015, 17:56 PMsiuking666

Artillery assualt gun designed to snipe infantry with HE shells from afar

Jump back to quoted post5 Nov 2015, 17:56 PMsiuking666

IS2 / SU85 + SU76 / T34-85 with Mark target.

Jump back to quoted post5 Nov 2015, 17:56 PMsiuking666

L2p. And your words mean bullshit as well, as long as you dont show what skill level we're talking about.

Jump back to quoted post4 Nov 2015, 22:08 PMArclyte

I know people hate getting gibbed from long range.

Jump back to quoted post5 Nov 2015, 18:20 PMRedT3rror

How do you counter a Jagdtiger or Elefant (with spotting scopes on it or on a 222 with vet2) who are protected by Minefields?

Jump back to quoted post5 Nov 2015, 19:09 PMHat

I see nobody complaining about OST scopes, SU-85, Searchlight or T-76.

ISU-152 should be a beast.

Jump back to quoted post5 Nov 2015, 07:15 AMMuxsus

The biggest problem with it is the rounds hitting the ground, most noticeable on Angoville and Langres. They just won't hit infantry at max range. 200 pen at max range is not exactly great either, considering that you need to screen its flanks with AT. Right now it just doesn't feel like it is worth it. I'd trade off the ridiculous RNG wipes for some reliability at range and a pen buff.

Jump back to quoted post5 Nov 2015, 22:17 PMsiuking666

That means you are not playing long enough to see the glorious days of 100 Range ISU wiping squads from afar with its self spot with 100% accuracy, while able to chain-stun/pen a Tiger Ace to death

Jump back to quoted post4 Nov 2015, 23:15 PMSully

Is this real life?

Jump back to quoted post6 Nov 2015, 03:49 AMWygrif

The monster assault guns need to stay dead. That meta was awful.

Jump back to quoted post5 Nov 2015, 15:37 PMAngryKitten465

I hadn't seen this unit in a long long time in 1v1. Came across one recently, my JP4 had no problem countering it at vet 3. This unit definitely needs some work!