Login

russian armor
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » Lobby » Pershing feedback

Pershing feedback

PAGES (7)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
varunax
2 Nov 2015, 04:03 AM
#121
avatar of varunax

Posts: 210

jump backJump back to quoted post1 Nov 2015, 21:14 PMTaurusBully
We are talking about game balance not real life purposes.


All the vehicles in the game were designed loosely off their real life counter parts. Hence the name designations, armor and gun profiles. If you can't tell the difference between a 76mm and 75mm you shouldn't even be talking about balance.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Horasu
2 Nov 2015, 04:08 AM
#122
avatar of Horasu

Posts: 279

I think +80 hp OR -30 fuel would be great for this tank. Also it bounces a frustratingly large amount of times on the Panther, but I think it's more of a "nerf panther armor" issue than "buff pershing pen" issue
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Bananenheld
2 Nov 2015, 04:59 AM
#123
avatar of Bananenheld

Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1

pershing is fine. so is the whole commander.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Jackas4life
2 Nov 2015, 06:01 AM
#124
avatar of Jackas4life
Benefactor 115

Posts: 486 | Subs: 1

What alot of people don't also seem to notice is if you use the HVAP round for 90 munis, it does 240 damage and you can do a rapid shot (hvap then a normal shot or vice versa)

Like the OST sniper, this ability will get people to retreat there tank when they take two rapid hits or 380 damage.
"Being a *** is the best thing you can ever do." - StephennJF 19/10/2013
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
JohnnyB
2 Nov 2015, 07:23 AM
#125
avatar of JohnnyB

Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1

Pershing it's not "wow". It's a good tank, but you should not expect sending it alone into enemy lines and win you the battle like *cough* a verry "balanced" british tank *cough* that we all know.

And I think it's ok like this, Tiger is not currently "wow" eather.

Does someone still build tiger...?
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Omega_Warrior
2 Nov 2015, 07:26 AM
#126
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Nov 2015, 07:23 AMJohnnyB

Does someone still build tiger...?

Yeah, the vast majority of whermacht players.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Looney
2 Nov 2015, 09:24 AM
#127
avatar of Looney
Patrion 14

Posts: 444

Perhaps we could give the pershing another ability, it just lacks a clear role that helps other units, apart from being a damage sponge.
I suggest giving it the M10 Flank Speed ability at vet 2 or the sherman smoke ability. Or maby make the veterancy grenade throw ability a self useable one. So you yourself could aim it like the comet version.
Playercard of Looney

1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P
1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P
1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P
1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Looney
2 Nov 2015, 09:40 AM
#128
avatar of Looney
Patrion 14

Posts: 444

I daresay pershing actually needs a crew for it's price, it's almost like Relic intented to give it a crew. It's relatively low armour and health that all USF tanks have to justify crews.
Playercard of Looney

1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P
1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P
1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P
1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Katitof
2 Nov 2015, 09:41 AM
#129
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Nov 2015, 09:24 AMLooney
[...]pershing[...]being a damage sponge.[...]


:huhsign:
jump backJump back to quoted post25 Nov 2015, 11:09 AM$nuffy
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
JohnnyB
2 Nov 2015, 10:31 AM
#130
avatar of JohnnyB

Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Nov 2015, 07:26 AMOmega_Warrior

Yeah, the vast majority of whermacht players.


Then I am one of them who doesn't build it anymore, simply because there are other better options...
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Looney
2 Nov 2015, 10:40 AM
#131
avatar of Looney
Patrion 14

Posts: 444

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Nov 2015, 09:41 AMKatitof


:huhsign:


Comparing the pershing to other heavy tanks it is really bad health wise, comparing it to all other USF tanks makes it a heavy tank. OpieOP












Playercard of Looney

1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P
1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P
1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P
1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
TAKTCOM
2 Nov 2015, 11:09 AM
#132
avatar of TAKTCOM

Posts: 275 | Subs: 1

One Stug rip Pershing at part. WTF.
Victory needs no explanation, defeat allows none
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Iron Emperor
2 Nov 2015, 11:16 AM
#133
avatar of Iron Emperor

Posts: 1653

Tiger 1 is still really viable. I also still make it. Great AT/AI tank and you know exactly what you get for that price.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
MoerserKarL
2 Nov 2015, 12:23 PM
#134
avatar of MoerserKarL
Donator 22

Posts: 1108

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Nov 2015, 11:09 AMTAKTCOM
One Stug rip Pershing at part. WTF.


One su85 rip Tiger at part.

whats your point?
Playercard of MoerserKarL

1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P
1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P
1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P
1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Australian Magic
2 Nov 2015, 13:25 PM
#135
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Nov 2015, 12:23 PMMoerserKarL


One su85 rip Tiger at part.

whats your point?


Not really if there is vet 2 Tiger with a range of tank destroyer :P
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Bananenheld
2 Nov 2015, 13:29 PM
#136
avatar of Bananenheld

Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Nov 2015, 13:25 PMAustralian Magic


Not really if there is vet 2 Tiger with a range of tank destroyer :P

..fair comparison( vet 0 vs vet 2 l0l? and you need atleast 10mins to vet up a tiger to vet 2). did u see vet 2 su85 machingun like firerate? jeez whats up with this forum :foreveralone:
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
PAGES (7)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » Lobby » Pershing feedback

Ladders Top 10

UKF
USF
OKW
SOV
OST
1v1
2v2
3v3
4v4
  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

Top Tier Teams
VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Einhoven Country Honor
Honor it
11
 Download
Download
1259
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

726 users are online: 726 guests
0 post in the last 24h
12 posts in the last week
24 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49851
Welcome our newest member, Eovaldis
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM