Login

russian armor

T-34/76 - just little fix

19 Oct 2015, 21:54 PM
#1
avatar of Frost

Posts: 1024 | Subs: 1

I think, for that price, there is no requaired buff in stats but I think, it would be enough to reduce veterancy requirements by 20% or 15% and make it a bit cheaper in MP (to 280/270 or even 250). What do you think about it?
19 Oct 2015, 21:57 PM
#2
avatar of RedT3rror

Posts: 747 | Subs: 2

Yes, manpower should be lower for a tank which comes out at a time when it's already outdated.
19 Oct 2015, 21:59 PM
#3
avatar of Blackart

Posts: 344

I think it could cost more fuel but less MP.

Also T-34-85 should be non doctrinal, after all Brits have non doctrinal cromwell, comet, firefly and churchill.

Why Soviets should have T-34-76 as the only medium tank, even OKW got Pz IV as a non doctrinal some patch ago.
20 Oct 2015, 09:06 AM
#4
avatar of Frost

Posts: 1024 | Subs: 1

If T34/85 were non doctrinal, no pne would build T34/76.
20 Oct 2015, 09:18 AM
#5
avatar of newvan

Posts: 354

jump backJump back to quoted post20 Oct 2015, 09:06 AMFrost
If T34/85 were non doctrinal, no pne would build T34/76.

If it will be like USF Wolverine or Puma, 7-8 CP and could be build without teching, it will have more usability than it have now.
20 Oct 2015, 09:19 AM
#6
avatar of Airborne

Posts: 281

Personally I would like to see a cost increase back to 100 feul and a stats buff for the t/34.
20 Oct 2015, 09:22 AM
#7
avatar of turbotortoise

Posts: 1283 | Subs: 4

Price is a woeful argument when put next to an M10. Give this thing a purpose. Make me want to requisition one.
20 Oct 2015, 09:41 AM
#8
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post20 Oct 2015, 09:18 AMnewvan

If it will be like USF Wolverine or Puma, 7-8 CP and could be build without teching, it will have more usability than it have now.

Wolverine got some serious buffs and is actually effective at its given role.

T34 struggles to fend off puma and lets not talk about its TD like AI performance.
If anything, it would end up just like M-42.
20 Oct 2015, 10:07 AM
#9
avatar of Jadek

Posts: 80

T34-76 is a shame ... i agree, T34-85 must be a no-doctrinal unit.

Delete Su-76, replace it with t34-76 in T3, then just put the t34-85 in T4. Problem solved. And no more free artillery barrage, no more call-in, everybody happy.

Only problem with this -> what we do about commanders with T34-85 ability ?
20 Oct 2015, 10:35 AM
#10
avatar of F1sh

Posts: 521

jump backJump back to quoted post20 Oct 2015, 10:07 AMJadek

Only problem with this -> what we do about commanders with T34-85 ability ?


Give them IS-2 :megusta:
20 Oct 2015, 10:37 AM
#11
avatar of Jadek

Posts: 80

jump backJump back to quoted post20 Oct 2015, 10:35 AMF1sh


Give them IS-2 :megusta:


lol, not sure that make everyone happy :D but it could be fair ! So much tiger commander vs 2 Is 2 commander.
20 Oct 2015, 10:50 AM
#12
avatar of Frost

Posts: 1024 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post20 Oct 2015, 10:35 AMF1sh


Give them IS-2 :megusta:


Then we would have double IS-2 in one commander :D (Armored Assault)

Still I think that, quicker veterancy would be much better and fine for this tank. And a bit cheaper in mp to buff it in industry and in normal games with commanders without callins tanks.
20 Oct 2015, 11:04 AM
#13
avatar of Jadek

Posts: 80

jump backJump back to quoted post20 Oct 2015, 10:50 AMFrost


Then we would have double IS-2 in one commander :D (Armored Assault)

Still I think that, quicker veterancy would be much better and fine for this tank. And a bit cheaper in mp to buff it in industry and in normal games with commanders without callins tanks.


Replace SU-76 by a SU-100 unit x), give it to armored assault. lol
20 Oct 2015, 11:05 AM
#14
avatar of DonnieChan

Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1

i like it and the concept of it. it only should have better accuracy vs inf
20 Oct 2015, 11:28 AM
#15
avatar of ElSlayer

Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1

My suggestions:

1) About T-34 performance against infantry:
Buff both MGs damage slightly.
Consistent damage >>>>>>> random squad wipes, both gameplay-wise and balance-wise.

2) About performance of all mediums when flanking heavies:
nerf all heavies rear armor so all generalist mediums could have 100% pen chance at point blank range.
Everyone remember that vid where engine-critted IS-2, while having sliver of health, have killed 2xPz.IVs that were shooting its rear armor?
20 Oct 2015, 11:49 AM
#16
avatar of UGBEAR

Posts: 954

All for Non-doc T-34/85 and the glorious addition of SU-100.

but SU is the forgotten faction, even their campaign are full of western soreness
20 Oct 2015, 12:42 PM
#17
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

Just give up on the non-doctrinal T-34/85. It been 3 years and the soviets are in a much better state then they were before. If they weren't going to do it before, they sure as hell won't do it now. Just move on already.
20 Oct 2015, 13:27 PM
#18
avatar of JohnnyB

Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1

T-34-85 should be non doctrinal,


Sure, as long as it will be as good as ostheer P4 and not better not even by the smallest margin. Or cheaper.
20 Oct 2015, 13:57 PM
#19
avatar of Porillio

Posts: 66

Pls fix deh tank

PLS :snfBarton:
20 Oct 2015, 14:52 PM
#20
avatar of Muxsus

Posts: 170

jump backJump back to quoted post20 Oct 2015, 13:27 PMJohnnyB


Sure, as long as it will be as good as ostheer P4 and not better not even by the smallest margin. Or cheaper.


It loses to a p4 1v1, you know. I also remember a nerf to its AI capability not long ago.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

639 users are online: 1 member and 638 guests
aerafield
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49152
Welcome our newest member, Cummings
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM