T-34/76 - just little fix
19 Oct 2015, 21:54 PM
#1
Posts: 1024 | Subs: 1
I think, for that price, there is no requaired buff in stats but I think, it would be enough to reduce veterancy requirements by 20% or 15% and make it a bit cheaper in MP (to 280/270 or even 250). What do you think about it?
19 Oct 2015, 21:57 PM
#2
Posts: 747 | Subs: 2
Yes, manpower should be lower for a tank which comes out at a time when it's already outdated.
 | Playercard of RedT3rror | |||||||||||||||
|
19 Oct 2015, 21:59 PM
#3
Posts: 344
I think it could cost more fuel but less MP.
Also T-34-85 should be non doctrinal, after all Brits have non doctrinal cromwell, comet, firefly and churchill.
Why Soviets should have T-34-76 as the only medium tank, even OKW got Pz IV as a non doctrinal some patch ago.
Also T-34-85 should be non doctrinal, after all Brits have non doctrinal cromwell, comet, firefly and churchill.
Why Soviets should have T-34-76 as the only medium tank, even OKW got Pz IV as a non doctrinal some patch ago.
20 Oct 2015, 09:06 AM
#4
Posts: 1024 | Subs: 1
If T34/85 were non doctrinal, no pne would build T34/76.
20 Oct 2015, 09:18 AM
#5
Posts: 354
If T34/85 were non doctrinal, no pne would build T34/76.
If it will be like USF Wolverine or Puma, 7-8 CP and could be build without teching, it will have more usability than it have now.
20 Oct 2015, 09:19 AM
#6
Posts: 281
Personally I would like to see a cost increase back to 100 feul and a stats buff for the t/34.
20 Oct 2015, 09:22 AM
#7
Posts: 1283 | Subs: 4
Price is a woeful argument when put next to an M10. Give this thing a purpose. Make me want to requisition one.
20 Oct 2015, 09:41 AM
#8
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
If it will be like USF Wolverine or Puma, 7-8 CP and could be build without teching, it will have more usability than it have now.
Wolverine got some serious buffs and is actually effective at its given role.
T34 struggles to fend off puma and lets not talk about its TD like AI performance.
If anything, it would end up just like M-42.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
20 Oct 2015, 10:07 AM
#9
Posts: 80
T34-76 is a shame ... i agree, T34-85 must be a no-doctrinal unit.
Delete Su-76, replace it with t34-76 in T3, then just put the t34-85 in T4. Problem solved. And no more free artillery barrage, no more call-in, everybody happy.
Only problem with this -> what we do about commanders with T34-85 ability ?
Delete Su-76, replace it with t34-76 in T3, then just put the t34-85 in T4. Problem solved. And no more free artillery barrage, no more call-in, everybody happy.
Only problem with this -> what we do about commanders with T34-85 ability ?
20 Oct 2015, 10:35 AM
#10
Posts: 521
Only problem with this -> what we do about commanders with T34-85 ability ?
Give them IS-2
20 Oct 2015, 10:37 AM
#11
Posts: 80
Give them IS-2
lol, not sure that make everyone happy
but it could be fair ! So much tiger commander vs 2 Is 2 commander.
20 Oct 2015, 10:50 AM
#12
Posts: 1024 | Subs: 1
Give them IS-2
Then we would have double IS-2 in one commander
(Armored Assault)Still I think that, quicker veterancy would be much better and fine for this tank. And a bit cheaper in mp to buff it in industry and in normal games with commanders without callins tanks.
20 Oct 2015, 11:04 AM
#13
Posts: 80
Then we would have double IS-2 in one commander
Still I think that, quicker veterancy would be much better and fine for this tank. And a bit cheaper in mp to buff it in industry and in normal games with commanders without callins tanks.
Replace SU-76 by a SU-100 unit x), give it to armored assault. lol
20 Oct 2015, 11:05 AM
#14
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
i like it and the concept of it. it only should have better accuracy vs inf
20 Oct 2015, 11:28 AM
#15
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
My suggestions:
1) About T-34 performance against infantry:
Buff both MGs damage slightly.
Consistent damage >>>>>>> random squad wipes, both gameplay-wise and balance-wise.
2) About performance of all mediums when flanking heavies:
nerf all heavies rear armor so all generalist mediums could have 100% pen chance at point blank range.
Everyone remember that vid where engine-critted IS-2, while having sliver of health, have killed 2xPz.IVs that were shooting its rear armor?
1) About T-34 performance against infantry:
Buff both MGs damage slightly.
Consistent damage >>>>>>> random squad wipes, both gameplay-wise and balance-wise.
2) About performance of all mediums when flanking heavies:
nerf all heavies rear armor so all generalist mediums could have 100% pen chance at point blank range.
Everyone remember that vid where engine-critted IS-2, while having sliver of health, have killed 2xPz.IVs that were shooting its rear armor?
20 Oct 2015, 11:49 AM
#16
Posts: 954
All for Non-doc T-34/85 and the glorious addition of SU-100.
but SU is the forgotten faction, even their campaign are full of western soreness
but SU is the forgotten faction, even their campaign are full of western soreness
First off all. Tripwire so gud, 10 ammo for a whole dead squad ? + sight.
Vehicle capture point can win games, blitzkrieg save a tank. Fair Deal i think
20 Oct 2015, 12:42 PM
#17
Posts: 2561
Just give up on the non-doctrinal T-34/85. It been 3 years and the soviets are in a much better state then they were before. If they weren't going to do it before, they sure as hell won't do it now. Just move on already.
20 Oct 2015, 13:27 PM
#18
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
T-34-85 should be non doctrinal,
Sure, as long as it will be as good as ostheer P4 and not better not even by the smallest margin. Or cheaper.
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
20 Oct 2015, 13:57 PM
#19
Posts: 66
Pls fix deh tank
PLS
PLS
20 Oct 2015, 14:52 PM
#20
Posts: 170
Sure, as long as it will be as good as ostheer P4 and not better not even by the smallest margin. Or cheaper.
It loses to a p4 1v1, you know. I also remember a nerf to its AI capability not long ago.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
50 | ||
|
|
|
|
24 | ||
 |
|
|
17 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
104 | ||
 |
|
|
47 | ||
 |
|
|
30 | ||
|
|
|
|
19 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.940410.696+6
- 4.35459.857-1
- 5.599234.719+7
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
11
Download
1265
Board Info
905 users are online:
905 guests
1 post in the last 24h
9 posts in the last week
27 posts in the last month
9 posts in the last week
27 posts in the last month
Registered members: 50006
Welcome our newest member, Villaloboski
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Villaloboski
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM