Login

russian armor

grenadier/panzergrenadier lack of survivability

PAGES (10)down
10 Oct 2015, 14:30 PM
#21
avatar of FichtenMoped
Editor in Chief Badge
Patrion 310

Posts: 4785 | Subs: 3

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Oct 2015, 14:18 PMKatitof

And doesn't give you anything else then the ability to use rifle at nade as opposed to ost one getting you to vet3.


Which therefore costs fuel and delays tech for example
10 Oct 2015, 14:39 PM
#22
avatar of The_rEd_bEar

Posts: 760

5 man grens and pgrens will need a dps nerf. Ost already have some of the best infantry in the game
10 Oct 2015, 14:49 PM
#23
avatar of cr4wler

Posts: 1164

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Oct 2015, 14:18 PMKatitof

And doesn't give you anything else then the ability to use rifle at nade as opposed to ost one getting you to vet3.


since i don't own the commander i don't know exactly how it works, but doesn't it get grens only to vet2? i'd have to look it up again, but i thought it gives a set amount of XP, which gets different units to different veterancy levels.

still: both commanders are utterly broken and don't belong in the game.
10 Oct 2015, 14:56 PM
#24
avatar of Son of Malice

Posts: 34

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Oct 2015, 14:49 PMcr4wler


since i don't own the commander i don't know exactly how it works, but doesn't it get grens only to vet2? i'd have to look it up again, but i thought it gives a set amount of XP, which gets different units to different veterancy levels.

still: both commanders are utterly broken and don't belong in the game.


Grens getting 3 vet pzgrens 2 vet. Imo no buffs for both squds needed. Grens are fine inf killers they are supposed to be glasscanon, they aren't meatsield. Pzgrens fine elite inf squad. Just stop crying guys.
10 Oct 2015, 19:29 PM
#25
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

1-Don't copy paste the DPS chart as it is incomplete. While outdated, this is what you should copypaste if you want it:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ApmrrrPr20ncdGF4VURuYjVGZXlIN3ptbV8tbzRzN0E&usp=drive_web#gid=0

2-Grens are fine. I advocate that PG needs a vet adjustment.

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Oct 2015, 14:18 PMRollo
I don't see the problem with Panzergrens, they feel just right imo.

G43's could use a buff, that's about it.


1- PG could see their vet2 buffs spread out with vet1. Performance gap between vet0 and vet 2 is huge,

2- G43 are fine on Grens. They needs a different role on PGs.
10 Oct 2015, 19:49 PM
#26
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

G43 are fine on Grens. They needs a different role on PGs.


I'm in favour of giving PG's a single Jäger G43 instead. Grenadier version is indeed fine as-is.
10 Oct 2015, 20:28 PM
#27
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1



I'm in favour of giving PG's a single Jäger G43 instead. Grenadier version is indeed fine as-is.

If they just gave sight like PFs' G43s I'd probably get at least one.

Still be an upgrade with pretty noticeable disadvantages...but hey, sight!
10 Oct 2015, 23:39 PM
#28
avatar of cr4wler

Posts: 1164



Grens getting 3 vet pzgrens 2 vet. Imo no buffs for both squds needed. Grens are fine inf killers they are supposed to be glasscanon, they aren't meatsield. Pzgrens fine elite inf squad. Just stop crying guys.


grens are useless late game. mgs are useless late game. ostwinds/p4s get countered by every medium tank or a single AT gun. there is no way for ostheer to handle a late game blob with veterancy.
10 Oct 2015, 23:55 PM
#29
avatar of Chet

Posts: 46

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Oct 2015, 23:39 PMcr4wler


grens are useless late game. mgs are useless late game. ostwinds/p4s get countered by every medium tank or a single AT gun. there is no way for ostheer to handle a late game blob with veterancy.


Inb4

"Mines and flank!"
11 Oct 2015, 00:14 AM
#30
avatar of DAZ187

Posts: 466

grens do not need a 5th man. with the lmg upgrade. they dominate on open maps and they have great vet.
P Grens are quite good. its just that no1 notices it cause they always upgrade them to double shrecks

Assault grens on the other hand. thats where the love should go
11 Oct 2015, 00:20 AM
#31
avatar of cr4wler

Posts: 1164

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Oct 2015, 23:55 PMChet


Inb4

"Mines and flank!"


it's smoke and flank though ;-)
11 Oct 2015, 00:45 AM
#32
avatar of Carlos Danger

Posts: 362

They don't need a fifth man. That said, I think their veterancy bonuses should be on-par with Allied infantry units. Riflemen have much better bonuses right now, and I'm not sure that should be the case.
11 Oct 2015, 00:50 AM
#33
avatar of Firesparks

Posts: 1930

They don't need a fifth man. That said, I think their veterancy bonuses should be on-par with Allied infantry units. Riflemen have much better bonuses right now, and I'm not sure that should be the case.

this back and forth buff needs to stop.
11 Oct 2015, 01:04 AM
#34
avatar of Appleseed

Posts: 622

all German infantry bonus need to be look at. right now allied infantry vet bonus is so strong the late game blob is almost unstoppable, HMG crew died so fast without doing much suppression. also i think allied rifle man need smoke nade removed, late game rifle blob with their smoke and bazooka, i find it really hard to defend against it.
11 Oct 2015, 01:23 AM
#35
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

all German infantry bonus need to be look at. right now allied infantry vet bonus is so strong the late game blob is almost unstoppable, HMG crew died so fast without doing much suppression. also i think allied rifle man need smoke nade removed, late game rifle blob with their smoke and bazooka, i find it really hard to defend against it.

First off, the vet buffs didn't increase DPS. Second, removing that would be like just removing Cons' Oorah! - it is incredibly defining to the unit.
11 Oct 2015, 02:20 AM
#36
avatar of Rifleman89

Posts: 66

Grenadiers already get huge vet2 and vet3 bonusses. They are not very durable but if you keep them healed and retreat soon enough with secured retreat path ...


Which means they cannot stay in the fight and give ground EARLIER or GET WIPED. Either way they are more ineffective. Thanks for making our point....
11 Oct 2015, 03:41 AM
#37
avatar of Firesparks

Posts: 1930



Which means they cannot stay in the fight and give ground EARLIER or GET WIPED. Either way they are more ineffective. Thanks for making our point....


grenadier get medkit at vet1. With enough munition and a halftrack axis can stay on the field as long as they don't retreat.


20 munition per medkit is a bit expensive, however. 15 or 10 mu for medkit would be a better price for them.

11 Oct 2015, 04:20 AM
#38
avatar of Dullahan

Posts: 1384

Axis have slightly weaker infantry.
Allies have slightly weaker vehicles.

Whoa.
11 Oct 2015, 07:12 AM
#39
avatar of Carlos Danger

Posts: 362

Axis have slightly weaker infantry.
Allies have slightly weaker vehicles.

Whoa.
But the Allies (Brits excepted) also tend to have numerical superiority, especially relative to the Wehrmacht.
11 Oct 2015, 08:04 AM
#40
avatar of Chet

Posts: 46

allies dont necessarily have weaker vehicles with the addition of the brits especially
PAGES (10)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

864 users are online: 864 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
40 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49079
Welcome our newest member, Rodfg15
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM