Su-85
Posts: 281
Posts: 279
Posts: 770
The su-85 is curently in a bad spot, It is out classed by the su-76. I think the Unit needs some love, espacailly in scaling since it comes out pretty late. What do you guys think?
Nothing wrong with it. of course its not the tools for noobs you need to properly support and scout ahead.
Posts: 658
Posts: 1439
Posts: 100
Su85 is a rapid, spammable TD with default maphack ability.
Posts: 81
Permanently BannedThat's probably a problem with the SU-76 being too good for cost.
Can reliably penetrate Tiger at vet 0
Meanwhile su85 is just lackluster. No reason to choose it when you can have 3 su76s by the time you can get one su85
Posts: 281
Nothing wrong with it. of course its not the tools for noobs you need to properly support and scout ahead.
I did not ask for advise how to use this unit.
Posts: 1653
Posts: 747 | Subs: 2
Posts: 509
That's probably a problem with the SU-76 being too good for cost.
+1 agreed.
Posts: 466
Posts: 656
Posts: 2561
The problem is that the SU-76 does the same thing for a much cheaper cost while having utility vs infantry. Making the SU-85 unnecessary.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
On the other hand, Su85 is fine but needs a better vet1 ability. See for example JPIV, which is fine unit but shines because of BS cloaking capabilities.
Posts: 2561
Su76 is really good for timing and performance. Not "OP" but does it job perfectly.The SU-76 scales way too well. It's supposed to be a light tank destroyer, but performs as well as the medium tank destroyers. It should be able to take on P4s, but should start suffering vs Panthers and Tigers.
The result I have been seeing is soviet players spamming them well into the late game which is ridiculous. Imagine if axis players were able spam Pumas and destroy IS-2s, that's pretty much what it's like. If soviet players want something to counter panthers and tigers they should be relying on SU-85s not su-76s.
Posts: 219
Su76 is really good for timing and performance. Not "OP" but does it job perfectly.
On the other hand, Su85 is fine but needs a better vet1 ability. See for example JPIV, which is fine unit but shines because of BS cloaking capabilities.
The SU-76 is definitely overperforming with vet vs vehicles and in the AI department with the free low CD barrage.
Posts: 279
Posts: 270 | Subs: 1
However as stated by others, SU-76 performs good enough that you'll never really need an SU-85
Posts: 871
SU-76 is decent but in late game they die very fast due to the HP and lack of armour.
Livestreams
23 | |||||
17 | |||||
5 | |||||
1 | |||||
319 | |||||
199 | |||||
5 | |||||
4 | |||||
2 | |||||
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1099614.642-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Mclatc16
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM