Posts: 392
+1 to this, I think Emplacements shouldn't be killed by arty (on or off map) but they should be vulnerable if unsupported against direct fire sources, such as tanks, panzershreks and flamethrowers (but not flame arty and other stuff like that).
Posts: 219
they should be weak to AT fire,flame damage and heavy art,BUT NOT PANZERSHREACKS
the last thing i want to see is more panzershreack blobs
 | Playercard of Ace of Swords | |||||||||||||||||||
|
8 Posts: 2470
Well why not? I get what you mean, but if let your mortar emplacement get ambushed by a blob of volks you deserve to lose it, it's really all about designating a counterplay alternative, meanwhile stuff like the bofors should be able to defend itself from such blob unless it's firing against a vehicle or something (but in that case it would be a micro mistake from the british player).
And also it's not like brits lack resources to counter them, so I think it would just be fair.
Posts: 622
Posts: 1124
Posts: 11
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently BannedThe American pac howitzer is way more effective. And has better vet.
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
Posts: 1124
And.... Thats a lie
Posts: 363
The American pac howitzer is way more effective. And has better vet.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
The American pac howitzer is way more effective. And has better vet.
+1..Vet 2 Pak howi is scary
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1439
Posts: 770
usfWe have target tables now. If ISG is over performing against UKF and their emplacements then I'm pretty sure this can be easily fixed.
Posts: 67
If allies had nukes, they would still be underpowered
4 Posts: 444
The American pac howitzer is way more effective. And has better vet.
| Playercard of Looney | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 67
volks are getting flame nade in the preview.
If allies had nukes, they would still be underpowered
4 Posts: 444
Good point, lets nerf the LeIG so the only tactic is to blob a load of volks and hope they don't die on their way while trying to get close enough to a mortar/bofors to nade the hell out of it. On top of them having no way to force brace.
| Playercard of Looney | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 1891
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
LeiG counters the pak howie, it has more range.
USF can't even get two pak howie's because they lack the MP for that.
And you have to position the pak howie really close for it to actually hit squads, thus you have to constantly reposition the pak howie, while you can just put your Leig in a safe spot and let it auto fire away. Can't do that with the USF howie.
Edit: not to mention, isn't the USF pak howie more expensive as well?
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
It's 40 more MP expensive because it has an additional crewman. And you can't just sit your LeiG behind a bunch of shit because both units are best used with direct LoS. Functionally they operate in the same range. And the person who said the Pack Howi has better Vet isn't wrong at all, the ISG's vet has been legit garbo since day 1.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Banned
It's 40 more MP expensive because it has an additional crewman.
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
 |
|
|
10 | ||
 |
|
|
185 | ||
|
|
|
|
24 | ||
 |
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
