Paging Dr. Cruzz. Dr. Cruzz to the allies OP thread.
Great. High level documented allied bias incoming.
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
Paging Dr. Cruzz. Dr. Cruzz to the allies OP thread.
Posts: 362
Posts: 369
Honestly why not.
Posts: 362
Yeah, except it doesn't.
Well, maybe because a pak one shots a bren, making it completely useless to build one
Posts: 369
Posts: 66
Ostheer doesn't need an at gun from minute 1 on to counter something like the bren or the m3, you got a faust isn't that enough for you? In that case learn to use it..... You get to t2 fast enough to counter stronger light vehicles like the aa halftrack.. and if you don't, gg for you vs us and sovs... and "play on for another 10 minutes until you get one" vs brits.
To sum it up.. it's ok and not needed if you don't want to mess up balance, or do the allies have a zis in t1 because a 222 could arrive?
Posts: 66
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It appears to be pretty one sided at the moment.
Playing constant CATCH-UP REACTION is destroying Axis play and it isn't L2P - we don't have the tools we need early enough to put up a good fight.
Posts: 66
Make shreks free while you're at it
No
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Posts: 66
I have a better idea, if you feel like you need early game AT gun-PLAY OKW.
Posts: 66
Only if the Panzerfaust then requires Battle Phase 1. Honestly, I'd rather just see light armor arrive later in the game.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
WHY IS THAT SUCH A GAME BREAKING NOTION, to have a reliable AT for Ost when it is most needed?
Posts: 1487
Posts: 21
Posts: 4928
pak needs small nerf. As OH need nerf in form of not alowing them to skip T4.
Sovs adapting to germs whole game and its more difficult than vice versa cuz most of their units are stronger.
Posts: 41
Permanently BannedPosts: 1820 | Subs: 2
Posts: 332 | Subs: 1
Posts: 871
Posts: 1108
13 | |||||
0 | |||||
311 | |||||
160 | |||||
6 | |||||
3 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |