Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Infantry Company Meta inbound! Now not only do Riflemen get the best LMG in the game and have the option for 2 of them, with instant cover and suppression anywhere at anytime. But now Riflemen can also lay the best mine in the game, even though they are core infantry.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 334
The issue was OKW had no real counter to it and placing trucks outside of the base is necessary for OKW to compete on many different maps. 160 is to low (IMO), 200 would have been the right amount of damage to adjust it to.
300 was waaay to much.
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
WHY?!
The Quad dies in 2 shots to any Axis AT. Isn't that enough?
Why is it so awful for Axis players that the Allies get good units? The M5 is perfectly fine as it is. How about you use the MANY options you have to kill it, and quit trying to give yourselves automatic wins by nerfing into oblivion anything and everything the Allies have that fulfill their intended purpose?
Yall killed the 120mm, Penals, Molotovs, the ML20, the ISU152, Katyushas... and that's just the Soviet units.
L
2
P
And quit whining
Posts: 824
WHY?!
The Quad dies in 2 shots to any Axis AT. Isn't that enough?
Why is it so awful for Axis players that the Allies get good units? The M5 is perfectly fine as it is. How about you use the MANY options you have to kill it, and quit trying to give yourselves automatic wins by nerfing into oblivion anything and everything the Allies have that fulfill their intended purpose?
Yall killed the 120mm, Penals, Molotovs, the ML20, the ISU152, Katyushas... and that's just the Soviet units.
L
2
P
And quit whining
Posts: 204
I know OKW have no real counter to the ML-20 but nerfing it with changes such as these is not fair. The size of most 1v1 maps does not conciliate the need of forward placement all of the time. Again, it's a player choice. You aren't being forced to place trucks forward and if you do so, how can you complain about the potential counter/punishment for doing so? If howies were unable to target HQ sectors then OKW players would have a choice of safe placement or opt for forward placement high risk/high reward. But I agree, 200 damage and then maybe 240 damage with vet would be about right for the ML-20.
Posts: 4928
And where will they get muni for it?
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
Posts: 2070
Axis doesn't have the best AT options in the game
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
Posts: 344
Pocketsize: "I can't wait till they add british to CoH: O; the extreme forces leveled by the new imbalances will create a black hole around the servers that destroys half of Canada."
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
I know OKW have no real counter to the ML-20 but nerfing it with changes such as these is not fair. The size of most 1v1 maps does not conciliate the need of forward placement all of the time. Again, it's a player choice. You aren't being forced to place trucks forward and if you do so, how can you complain about the potential counter/punishment for doing so? If howies were unable to target HQ sectors then OKW players would have a choice of safe placement or opt for forward placement high risk/high reward. But I agree, 200 damage and then maybe 240 damage with vet would be about right for the ML-20.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Defensive Stance is free, it won't drain you to abuse it.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1484
 | Playercard of WingZero | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 2070
Axis doesn't have the best AT options in the game
Posts: 4928
And you believe the mines are free as well?
Does your potential BO include 4 muni caches to sustain the mines and dual LMG on every squad?
Or you're going to be real about it?
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
All Flame Weapons have had their damage increased to compensate
Posts: 1487
Kind of. Except that now LEfh is superior to the ML-20 for no reason at all.
Having same damage , faster RoF, and firing more rounds. At vet 1 they fire the same but LEfh has counterbattery fire.
This is probably an overnerf, i suspect it being 200-240 in the live version.
| Playercard of eqdw | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 218
Whining pot calling the kettle black....
L2P without relying on over-performing units yourself. The "best" stuff for Axis is balanced with high costs and having smaller squads trying to maintain map control. even then "best" is subjective to Vet levels and stages of the game. Starting off riflemen are the "best" line infantry, late game it could be considered Vet 5 Obers with Stgs or Vet 3 Paratroopers with Thompsons/LMGs, both of which are useless vs tanks. Soviets still have the best combined arty in the game, 120MM mortar is now much cheaper for doing full model damage and the SU76 got an excellent buff.
Posts: 412
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
Those USF fixes. oh wait there are almost none. Really hope they will release more USF fixes like the mayor arty wich has been broken for more then a year.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
 |
|
|
42 | ||
|
|
|
|
31 | ||
|
|
|
|
26 | ||
 |
|
|
15 | ||
|
|
|
|
11 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
13 | ||
 |
|
|
9 | ||
 |
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
