But lol at comparing the M5 to a countering problem. The M5 is a problem because it's over preforming for cost AND it has very little in the way of reliable counters because it can kill AT gun's insanely quickly and smash Flak HT's and 222's.
So what else would you call the Ostheer sniper with a single gren next to it?
What?
Too early to tell (haven't seen it in Relic stream), but it WAS a puma with less range and cost.
You can't snipe British garrison structures.
The fastest emplacement is the mortar emplacement, which comes into play at about 6 minutes. That means that you have been bled for 5 minutes. Not exactly a reliable counter that comes at a reasonable time.
No my point is that if you have 2 Soviet snipers you can literally force your enemy to retreat with 1 click due to the nature of 4 mans squads.
And what about 2 Ostheer snipers vs. 4 man squads? Even faster retreats? How are you able to in the same post say that Ostheer sniper is fine vs. 4-man squads and Soviet sniper with lower ROF is also fine? Either one is overperforming or the other is underperforming. Which is it?
Snipers largest draw back is reduction in map presence, as well as for Ostheer a big push back in teching time.
Not against Brits, who have less (expensive ) squads AND less starting MP (remember that 60mp increase Ostheer got?)
Like seriously, I have no idea how in one thread you can claim that the Soviet sniper does very good bleed against storms and grens (28mp per model and 30 mp per model), whilst simultaneously saying that the German sniper will be balanced when shooting faster against squads with more mp concentration per model.